Wikidata:Property proposal/Juno Download album ID
Juno Download album ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Not done
| Description | identifier for an album on Juno Download site |
|---|---|
| Represents | Juno Download (Q64577635) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | album (Q482994), single (Q134556) |
| Example 1 | Home (Q67607068) → 4287983-02 |
| Example 2 | Spectre (Q68107521) → 2732412-02 |
| Example 3 | Alors on danse (Q708698) → 4137228-02 |
| Source | https://www.junodownload.com |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | putting value to albums available from the Juno Download site |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| Formatter URL | https://www.junodownload.com/products/$1 |
| See also | Juno Download artist ID (P6920) |
Motivation edit
Property for albums included in Juno Download. Eurohunter (talk) 19:03, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Discussion edit
Comment: It would greatly help if you would tell us what Juno Download is. Juno Download (Q64577635) doesn't really tell me all that much. --Trade (talk) 10:54, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Trade:
Done Eurohunter (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2019 (UTC) 
Support David (talk) 16:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
Oppose this is yet another music webshop id which does not add any clear benefit over others - the goal of the proposer seems to be to add more statements to Basshunter (Q383541) − Pintoch (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Then request removal of album id of other shops. Eurohunter (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Will you do it or remove your vote? Your vote has no valid arguments. Eurohunter (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Eurohunter: No, I am not going to nominate other album ids for deletion, nor remove my vote. I think we have created enough of these properties, and I would like to wait for these to reach a meaningful coverage before creating others. Also, in my experience, it is rarely a good idea to harass people who oppose your own proposals: curiously, that does not tend to convert oppose votes into support votes. − Pintoch (talk) 17:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: No. If there is allowed Apple Music, Spotify, Google Play Music and more it means any major online music store should be included as well. Eurohunter (talk) 23:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Eurohunter: No, I am not going to nominate other album ids for deletion, nor remove my vote. I think we have created enough of these properties, and I would like to wait for these to reach a meaningful coverage before creating others. Also, in my experience, it is rarely a good idea to harass people who oppose your own proposals: curiously, that does not tend to convert oppose votes into support votes. − Pintoch (talk) 17:50, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Will you do it or remove your vote? Your vote has no valid arguments. Eurohunter (talk) 17:43, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Pintoch: Then request removal of album id of other shops. Eurohunter (talk) 00:03, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose - I am really not comfortable with us adding identifiers for every online music shop out there. These are purely commercial links and don't seem to add much value or information. Andrew Gray (talk) 23:10, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Not done There is no consensus to create this property --DannyS712 (talk) 07:35, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
