Wikidata:Property proposal/Offizielle Deutsche Charts album ID

Offizielle Deutsche Charts album ID edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

Done: Offizielle Deutsche Charts album ID (P10262) (Talk and documentation)

Description	identifier for an album on Offizielle Deutsche Charts site
Represents	Offizielle Deutsche Charts (Q64569517)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	album (Q482994)
Example 1	LOL <(^^,)> (Q664873) → 39596
Example 2	Different World (Q59617920) → 374965
Example 3	Racine carrée (Q14566706) → 222247
Source	https://www.offiziellecharts.de
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Planned use	Putting value to albums available on the Offizielle Deutsche Charts site.
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://www.offiziellecharts.de/album-details-$1
See also	P6893 (P6893)

Motivation edit

Property for albums included in Offizielle Deutsche Charts. Eurohunter (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

WikiProject Music has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.. Trivialist (talk) 02:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Shouldn't this be called "title ID" rather than "album ID" ? Moebeus (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Moebeus: Why? It's standard album ID. Eurohunter (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eurohunter: It's a little confusing when it applies to both albums and singles ("titels" ?) as per you example, I think it would be helpful if the Identifier name reflects that it covers both? Apart from that, I'm in support of this. Moebeus (talk) 16:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Moebeus: Maybe it should have two id's for album and song ("title")? Eurohunter (talk) 16:05, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Moebeus (talk) 16:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ I would support this proposal if it were split into two separate properties, since that way it would be much easier to handle constraint violations and the values would be much shorter. Jc86035 (talk) 10:44, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jc86035: @Moebeus: @Trivialist: Splitted Eurohunter (talk) 14:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jc86035 (talk) 14:08, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral ~~Strong oppose~~,
- The site centralizes 6 different types of ID and they are not present in your proposal.
- Depending on what you write above, the separation between "song" and "album" is unnecessary, as titles can be included in several types (pop, vinyl, etc.).
- The IDs on the site are similar to the same form as IMDb: THE-TYPE-numeric_identifier.
- The fields do not match each other in your proposal.
- Rest assured: it would be interesting to have a property like this, but surely not from this proposal. Copy to rework. —Eihel (talk) 21:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
opinion changed —Eihel (talk) 17:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dear @Eihel: it's true that there exist 6 types of IDs, but only two IDs are counting (album and titel):

vinyl-1360=album-1360

compilation-14405=album-14405

hiphop-484879=album-484879

dance-2219324=titel-2219324

Therefore it is enough to create a property only for album and titel what I think is justifiable. Bigbossfarin (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bigbossfarin Galaktos Labant M2k~dewiki Mathieu Kappler PantherStrix Wiljes jobu0101 cookroach Looniverse
Notified participants of WikiProject Germany — MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 15:34, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Germartin1 (talk) 18:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]