Wikidata:Property proposal/Tribe

tribe

edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization

   Done: tribe (P12011) (Talk and documentation)
Descriptionrecognised membership in a society, mainly denoted by shared cultural heritage
Representstribe (Q133311)
Data typeItem
Domainhuman (Q5), legendary figure (Q13002315), human whose existence is disputed (Q21070568), mythical character (Q4271324), hypothetical person (Q75855169) and maybe fictional character (Q95074)
Allowed valuesItems that are instances of tribe (Q133311): tribus (Q938560), Native American tribe (Q12885585), First Nation band (Q2882257), tribes of Israel (Q2605404), iwi (Q1676081), Seven Slavic tribes (Q221355), Polish tribes (Q3277231), Turkmen tribes (Q7855428), Kabylian tribes (Q3538942), Hazara tribes (Q6572970), Tribes of Montenegro (Q83793567), Pashtun tribe (Q3918404) and many others
Example 1Julius Caesar (Q1048)Fabia (Q3538791)
Example 2Jalaluddin Haqqani (Q186013)Zadran (Q8064185)
Example 3Vercingetorix (Q178953)Arverni (Q382553)
Example 4Stand Watie (Q288408)Cherokee Nation (Q14708404)
Example 5Tarzan (Q170241)Waziri (Q56917)
Example 6Tatanka (Q951430)Lumbee (Q1886046)
Example 7David (Q41370)Tribe of Judah (Q913564)
Example 8Muhammad (Q9458)Quraysh (Q485732)
SourceSocial Anthropology of North American Tribes (Q60263529), Detribalizing the later prehistoric past: Concepts of tribes in Iron Age and Roman studies (Q56476488), State‐tribe relations: Kurdish tribalism in the 16th‐ and 17th‐century Ottoman empire (Q56094933), Lotte Hedeager. Iron Age societies: from tribe to state in northern Europe, 500 BC to AD 700. (Social Archaeology). Translated by John Hines. ix + 274 pages, 95 figures. 1992. Oxford: Basil Blackwell: ISBN 0-631-17106-1 hardback £30 (Q58890026), Indianlaw.org, Alaskan villages
See alsoethnic group (Q41710), clan (Q211503), national citizenship (Q42138), country of citizenship (P27), ethnic group (P172), member of Roman tribe (P11491), Wikidata:Property proposal/Nationality, Wikidata:Property proposal/nationality (cultural identity), Wikidata:Property proposal/Cultural identity, Wikidata:Property proposal/clan

Motivation

edit

Tribes are the social system which most human beings in history have lived under before the birth of nation states, and they continue to exist de facto or legaly recognized in many places today on all six populated continents. A tribe is not necessarily an ethnic group, many tribes have allowed or continue to allow people to become parts of them trought marriage, adoption, or other means, people can also be members of tribes because they have been raised within their culture even if lacking much or any blood relation to the overall tribe. On the reverse many individual tribes can also belong to the exact same ethnic group as each other, with any outsider not being able to tell them apart physically or culturally, but the people themselves knowing very well where their indentity is. As of now many items on Wikidata for American indigenous leaders lack links to the very tribes they were the chiefs of, only including a broader ethnic category and or citizenship to the countries they happen to live in. Same can be said for ancient Roman people whose very voting rights were tied to their tribal belonging. The topic has come up on the project chat several times 1, 2, and I believe it is time to finally propose this.

I would also be open to there being individual properties for some countries' legaly recognized tribes, for example a property named "First Nation band" for Canada, "Federally recognized tribe" as well as "State recognized tribe" for the US, and "Roman tribe" for ancient Rome. Worth noting that in the US and Canada many tribes have reservations of land belonging to them and they have a certain amount of sovergeinity, if items for them are created it would be good to allow for a "belongs to" or similar on those items.StarTrekker (talk) 15:36, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

edit

  Done tribe (P12011). Please keep in mind that this property should be used with discretion. Jonathan Groß (talk) 07:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also   Comment For Roman tribus which are different from other tribes in many ways, we already have member of Roman tribe (P11491) and should continue using it. I cannot with certainty say anything about the other examples given above, but to me as a layman they seem okay. Jonathan Groß (talk) 07:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]