Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2016/10/25
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Q27536485: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:44, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Q8504383: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty category following the region's abolition in January 2016. --- cycŋ - (talk • contribs • logs) 10:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jared Preston (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
London Gatwick Airport (Q12692801): international airport in West Sussex, England: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate of Q8703. not candidate for merge as Q8703 already has its relevant properties. --Sbma44 (talk) 15:07, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Jared Preston --DeltaBot (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Q27524260: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, no links or sitelinks. -- Irn (talk) 02:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
Delete I added an iTunes ID, but I don't think that is sufficient to make the item pass the notability criteria. Lymantria (talk) 09:53, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- The other edits by that user also need checking, they seem to be adding quite a few items with no sitelinks, a few have IMDb links but are still dubious (e.g. Q27510884, a 7 month old film director...). Some of sitelinks (on the ones which have sitelinks) are just empty Commons categories added by Special:Contributions/69.115.75.63, those edits are more of the same... - Nikki (talk) 11:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, I wonder if this is the same IP that has been creating dozens of hoax items related to film. Some had been nominated for deletion here by other users, such as films "scheduled for release in 2020, 2021" etc. Of course, not a single source in sight. Many, many film actors, directors even, of such young ages that surely only pedobear could be interested in. Linking already non-notable items to others, creating a real network of hoaxes – some seem to have been cleverly thought out, but that thing with only Commons links has been a real give-away. It almost seems like some bot-work going on. I don't really care, when I've come across such shit it's been deleted on-sight. I don't like such scamming and this isn't the place for it. Jared Preston (talk) 14:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- The other edits by that user also need checking, they seem to be adding quite a few items with no sitelinks, a few have IMDb links but are still dubious (e.g. Q27510884, a 7 month old film director...). Some of sitelinks (on the ones which have sitelinks) are just empty Commons categories added by Special:Contributions/69.115.75.63, those edits are more of the same... - Nikki (talk) 11:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:00, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Q10174605: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item FShbib (talk) 18:48, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Q23908055: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Article deleted as not notable: hu:Wikipédia:Törlésre javasolt lapok/Marek Zoltán. Máté (talk) 19:12, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Q25192665: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted on svwiki, see also [1]. Korg (talk) 22:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted by Jared Preston (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:10, 25 October 2016 (UTC)