Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2018/01/04

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Munsö (Q2149064): village in Ekerö Municipality, Sweden: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q20477542 Migel Sances Huares (talk) 20:13, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

@Migel Sances Huares: What's the reason it should be deleted? Mbch331 (talk) 20:47, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:20, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
  Keep - Neither shouldn't be deleted. Maybe these items could be merged but this page isn't needed for that, so no reason to follow up on this request. - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 07:53, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

  Not done given that no argument was brought forward. ChristianKl02:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Fictional organisations

  1. Q47015279 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q47015201 (delete | history | links | logs)

A couple of elements created by a unch of IPs seems like madeup of fictional info. ⟨ RoberPL Dígame ⟩ 09:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Delete: The website given for Q47015201 does not exist. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  DeletedMisterSynergy (talk) 12:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Q47038374: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty David (talk) 08:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by MisterSynergy (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Q10610082: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty, redirect on sv.wiki AttoRenato (talk) 03:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  Not deleted; the svwiki redirect target was not connected to any item, now it is again. This was consequence of some odd content moves in svwiki. —MisterSynergy (talk) 13:11, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Q22126584: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Made by sock & article is deleted on urwiki --BukhariSaeed (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  Deleted by Mbch331 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Q45276842: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Made by urwiki sock --BukhariSaeed (talk) 12:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  Deleted by Mbch331 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Q45283681: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Made by urwiki sock --BukhariSaeed (talk) 12:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  Deleted by Mbch331 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Q45285588: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Made by urwiki sock --BukhariSaeed (talk) 12:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  Deleted by Mbch331 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Q22863414: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty element --VladXe (talk) 13:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by ChristianKl (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Q3837132: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  Deleted by ChristianKl (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Guy Lebègue (Q44726712): Photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not used in any project, not notable Randykitty (talk) 19:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Only sitelink being a Commonscat doesn't make the item notable per WD:N rule #1, no incoming links so that fails #3 and didn't see any proof of #2. Mbch331 (talk) 19:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  Deleted by Mbch331 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Weisskirchen (Q29449982): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q29449982 is a duplicate of Q2557258. ThePierrasse (talk) 20:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done Redirect created by Mbch331, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Lela Viola Burton (Q45350882): Botanist (1901-1967): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't meet the notability policy. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:00, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Apparently related to PlantsAndPeople (Q31805038); see also Special:WhatLinksHere/Q31805038. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Looks like another “Black Lunch Table”-like project. We should develop policies and guidelines for such projects before this gets out of control. Whom can we ping in this case, just in case? —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC) At least there are not many items in this catalog with questionable notability. —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Probably is the third that I see in Wikidata. If we are all agree, we can create a specific property for this cases and add exception in Wikidata:Notability/Inclusion criteria: "All the items with this property are notable" --ValterVB (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Exist also catalog (P972)=WIKIarte (Q36788585). All this catalog don't respect "Value type" constraint. --ValterVB (talk) 09:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
  •   Comment if this doesn't meet notability policy, it should be deleted. Keeping it doesn't seem fair towards contributors who attempt to make discriminate contributions with references and towards contributors whose additions get deleted due to a lack of notability and/or lack of references supporting notability.
    --- Jura 14:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
    • This distinction between items which lack notability and which have lack of references supporting notability is crucial. The notability criteria reads The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described (and not is described) using serious and publicly available references. If we trust that the people discussed on these projects are not just some random people but were notable for their field, we should keep the items. --Pasleim (talk) 15:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
      • The best way to build such trust is to add references to at least one statement on the items.
        In the past, it was clearly stated that at least for one project this couldn't be done and with another project, where the deleting admin went through searching mentioned references for the item, it was found that it didn't actually support it. Adding imaginary catalogues isn't really trust building either.
        It should be fairly straightforward to import lists once references are available.
        Wikidata isn't free storage space for people's todo list, it's a secondary database. I find it unfortunate that people started involving Wikidata in such editathons, earlier ones went much better.
        --- Jura 16:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

See also discussion at Property talk:P972#Abuse of this property for original research. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

So is this discussion about the use of catalog (P972) or about deleting Lela Viola Burton (Q45350882)? --Pasleim (talk) 20:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  Not deleted, seems like some item existed before. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Nick Zano (Q20068815): actor, television producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Moved Lexusuns (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

  Done Redirect created by Sjoerddebruin, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 4 January 2018 (UTC)