Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2020/02/27

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q76609715

Dominic Selorm Yao Amuzu (Q76609715): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable P134toP4913 (talk) 10:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

I'd like to see someone fill in the data before we decide. A quick web search makes it seem like he may have some scholarly articles. This isn't my area of knowledge. Quakewoody (talk) 14:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Not deleted some data was added, looks notable now. --DannyS712 (talk) 17:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Q15630491

Needs to be merged with Q1144724. Q15630491 contains the newer synonym. --Rembert Andy (talk) 17:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Synonyms ARE NOT aliases, but valid taxon names. They have different authors and dates of publication. They have different type species. They DO NOT refer to the same taxon concept.They should never be merged, despite the vile messes that have been created in wikidata... (There can also be an issue with marking them as instances of synonym rather than taxon, since (for plants), many authorities do not agree.) MargaretRDonald (talk) 19:30, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Not deleted --DannyS712 (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Q75381653

third miscarried child of Anne of Great Britain (Q75381653): (1697-1697): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

See discussion at Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/01/19#Q75381653 already archived.
I think "number of children" can be used instead. --- Jura 09:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Keep, deletion was already refused once (by Pasleim) in the mentioned discussion. number of children (P1971) is not equivalent as it does not allow to give other information like the date of birth/death and gender of the children. I agree with Wolverène that it fits criteria 3 of WD:N. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 19:19, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
I don't see a structural need to keep this. Not sure why the discussion was closed prematurely. --- Jura 11:03, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Keep considering the amount of effort to create all these items, impressive Germartin1 (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
not deleted --DannyS712 (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Q83251106

Kanan Matsuura (Q83251106): fictional character from Love Live! Sunshine!!: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Test item Nadzik (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:56, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

@1997kB, Bulakog: You have edited this item. Would you be able to comment on this request? Deryck Chan (talk) 11:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Keep Item seems to serve a purpose (fictional character in Love Live! Sunshine!! (Q25340071)) and has external identifiers. Deryck Chan (talk) 11:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Clearly notable, has structural need. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 13:36, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
I will agree with User:1997kB. When I decided to request for deletion, the page looked like this. Sincerely! Nadzik (talk) 11:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
not deleted --DannyS712 (talk) 17:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

Q31717576 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q31716319 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q31727558 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

There are 4 items to the same object „SHERWOOD RANGE“, New Zealand, only Q83862236 is propely used Ulanwp (talk) 16:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Each item has different identifiers. I don't know enough about the items or the identifier, but I've restored the items to the state before your edits so that others can see them in their original form. Quakewoody (talk) 16:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
All should probably be merged to Sherwood Range (Q31717576). The other items look like they are to show approximate extent of the range on geonames.org, or are duplicates because of its length. Peter James (talk) 23:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
@Ulanwp, Quakewoody, Peter James: As long as there are different articles on cebwiki, there's no point in deleting/merging them. Firstly we need to merge them on cebwiki. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 04:14, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
It looks like that a bot is using information from geonames.org and creating strange article on cebwiki with creating items on wikidata. Only the coordinates in lemma are different. In this case we can wait indefinitely for someone would take care of it, I guess. -- Ulanwp (talk) 13:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
These items are created by a bot at the cebwiki. I found that if you merge them there they won't be recreated, effectively solving the issue. The articles probably have a big overlap and with the help of Sherwood Range (Q83862236) I think it shouldn't be a big problem to fix this, even without knowledge of the language (Copy/Paste does the trick). I'll have a go at it... - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 10:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Merged Q31727558, Q31717576 and Q83862236 into Q31716319. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 10:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Q84561727

Ioan Cojocariu (Q84561727): Romanian politician from Botoșani: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I will make another one MSClaudiu (talk) 15:05, 7

@MSClaudiu: Why do you want to create another one? --Esteban16 (talk) 17:57, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

To follows the pattern of romanian names on Wikidata it should be Ioan Cojocariu.--MSClaudiu (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

@MSClaudiu: The labels can be changed, so there's no need to create an entire new item. If you already did, please read Help:Merge. Esteban16 (talk) 23:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Not done, per above.--Esteban16 (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Q55336068

Justin B. Rye (Q55336068): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lack of notability --Charles Matthews (talk) 09:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

As the author of Q55335948, he has a reason to be here. But, at the same time, I would like a native speaker to read the wp article to determine if that has a reason to be here. We either keep them both or we get rid of them both. Quakewoody (talk) 15:12, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Used at Ranto (Q55335948), which has an article on the Esperanto Wikipedia. There is a structural need to indicate the creator of that opinion piece. Robin van der Vliet (talk) (contribs) 17:32, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Wikidata:Notable enough according to Wikidata criteria. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Not deleted --DannyS712 (talk) 17:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)