Property talk:P8419

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• String length
• List of qualifiers
• Count

Archive of Our Own tag
tag for this item on “Archive of Our Own”

Applicable "stated in" value	Archive of Our Own (Q27764876)
Data type	External identifier
Example	Harry Potter (Q3244512) → Harry Potter One Direction (Q146027) → One Direction (Band) Hetalia: Axis Powers (Q518169) → Hetalia: Axis Powers
Source	https://archiveofourown.org/ https://archiveofourown.org/media
Formatter URL	https://wikidata-externalid-url.toolforge.org/?p=8419&url_prefix=https://archiveofourown.org/tags/&id=$1
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties Items with no other external identifier Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Chart by item creation date Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 4,599 Main statement 4,595 out of 17,987,536 (0% complete) >99.9% of uses Qualifier 3 <0.1% of uses Reference 1 <0.1% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419#Entity types

Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419#Scope, SPARQL

Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: Bella Goth (Q6098819)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419#Single value, SPARQL

Required qualifier “has characteristic (P1552)”: this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL

Required qualifier “object has role (P3831)”: this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL

Label required in languages: en: Entities using this property should have labels in one of the following languages: en (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419#Label in 'en' language, search, SPARQL

Qualifiers “has characteristic (P1552), object has role (P3831), reason for preferred rank (P7452), reason for deprecated rank (P2241), subject named as (P1810), together with (P1706), mapping relation type (P4390), identifier shared with (P4070)”: this property should be used only with the listed qualifiers. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P8419#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL

Link does not work (spaces are replaced by "+")

@Shisma: maybe you can help: For some reason the links provided by Archive of Our Own tag (P8419) don't work (spaces are replaced by "+"). Is there something that could be done about this? - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 15:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Valentina.Anitnelav: a url must not contain a literal space character ( ). Spaces should be replaced by %20. Some services replace it with + (because it is more readable 🤷). I don't know what software adds the + character here but %20 would work. You should ask the wikidata technical staff. as a workaround you can use %20 in the id. for example: Harry%20Potter--Shisma (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

With "%20" it does not work, either[1]... I will report this issue at Wikidata:Contact_the_development_team. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 16:46, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Use of qualifiers

1. Tag Category

There are four tag categories tags are sorted into:

• fandom tag (Q110914098)
• character tag (Q110914171)
• relationship tag (Q110918476)
• additional tag (Q107316855) (freeform tag)

Additionally there is

• unsorted tag (Q107532692) -> maybe to be replaced by object has role (P3831) <no value>

You find the tag category in the tag description ("This tag belongs to the ... Category").

To indicate in which category a tag added to a wikidata item belongs use object has role (P3831) as a qualifier

Examples:

Example 1: Sherlock (Q192837)

Archive of Our Own tag	Sherlock (TV) edit object has role fandom tag ← this tag is categorized as a fandom tag has characteristic common tag 0 references add reference
		add value

Example 2: 18th century (Q7015)

Archive of Our Own tag	18th Century CE RPF edit object has role fandom tag ← this tag is categorized as a fandom tag has characteristic common tag 0 references add reference 18th century edit object has role additional tag ← this tag is categorized as an additional (freeform) tag has characteristic common tag 0 references add reference
		add value

2. Tag status

A tag can have one of three status:

• common tag (Q105265074)
• synonymous tag (Q105761517) -> please only add if relevant (e.g. there is an own wikidata item for the concept this tag refers to or this tag is relevant for some other reason. Don't add all spelling variants)
• non-canonical tag (Q105264904) -> maybe to be replaced by has characteristic (P1552) -> <no value>

You find the tag status in the tag description ("It's a common tag"/"... has been made a synonym of"/"This tag has not been marked common and can't be filtered on (yet).").

To indicate in which category a tag added to a wikidata item belongs use has characteristic (P1552) as a qualifier

Common tags are the most relevant tags in Wikidata. Please only add synonymous tags if relevant. You should give tags marked as common a preferred rank, especially if there are synonymous tags. Synonymous tags should get a deprecated rank.

Examples:

1. Africa (Q15)

Archive of Our Own tag	Africa edit object has role additional tag has characteristic common tag ← this tag is a common tag, with preferred rank 0 references add reference Afrika edit object has role additional tag has characteristic synonymous tag ← this tag is categorized as a synonymous tag, with deprecated rank 0 references add reference
		add value

3. How to add relationship tags

Don't create items for relationships. Instead, if you want to add a relationship tag, add this tag to all characters involved along with qualifier together with (P1706).

Examples: 1. Sherlock Holmes (Q4653)/Dr. John Watson (Q187349):

At Sherlock Holmes (Q4653) (add the same statement to Dr. John Watson (Q187349) with together with (P1706) Sherlock Holmes (Q4653)):

Archive of Our Own tag	Sherlock Holmes/John Watson edit object has role relationship tag ← this tag is categorized as a relationship tag has characteristic common tag together with Dr. John Watson 0 references add reference
		add value

4. Discussion

@Trade: Do you have any comments or corrections? - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

• 1: Why did you changed the name of non-canonical tag (Q105264904)?
• 2: Should we stop making synonymous tag deprecated?
• 3:We should probably have a rule limiting relationship tags to characters within the same narrative universe.
• 4: Does an entity having a short name fall under different spelling?
• 5: Is it relevant to include tne native name of manga and anime characters as synonymous tags (Q112130774#P8419)? I notice some characters have tags for both their English spelling (given name, family name) and Japanese (family name, given name) (Q3816206#P8419) with the former being synonymous.

@Valentina.Anitnelav:--Trade (talk) 02:33, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

@Trade:

• 1. Mainly because "This tag has not been marked common and can't be filtered on (yet)" is a description, not really a label (it is in my opinion similar to having "It's a common tag. You can use it to filter works and to filter bookmarks." as a label for common tag (Q105265074)). I found the term "non-canonical tag" in the tag search. But I don't insist on it - if you prefer the other label, feel free to change it back.
• 2. I think the deprecated rank is not the right rank for synonymous tags. Deprecated means that this tag is erroneous or outdated, which is not the case for synonymous tags.
• 3. Do you want to limit this because there could be too many relationship tags for one character (e.g. 6000+ for Harry Potter (Q3244512))? Maybe we should limit it to the y most frequent relationships or to relationship tags with at least x works.
• 4. I don't understand this point.
• 5. To be honest I did not think about what would make a synonymous tag relevant if the canonical tag is also present. I don't mind if people add synonymous tags as long as an item does not end up with too many synonymous tags added. I just don't think that synonymous tags are very useful if the canonical tag is present at the same item. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 12:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
• 2. As far as i can tell we usually deprecate redirect URLs and identifiers and i inferred that synonymous tags filled that function @Valentina.Anitnelav: --Trade (talk) 00:27, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

• I see, then let's keep them deprecated. I'll change the example above. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 08:13, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

No problems with your proposal otherwise--Trade (talk) 21:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)