Ich kann keine Interwikis mehr hinzufügen

edit

Seit einiger Zeit erscheint bei mir beim Hinzufügen von Interwikis das Feld für den Artikel nicht mehr. Beispiel von heute: Q424138, wo ich pl:Pileus hinzufügen wollte (hat eigenen Datensatz Q11817053). Früher wurde das Feld nach Eingabe des Artikels rosa und zeigte mir an, dass ich erst den Artikel aus Q1181705 löschen musste. -- Olaf Studt (talk) 20:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vielleicht auch das hier: Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2013/07#.22edit.22_instead_of_.22save_.2F_cancel.22 --Tobias1984 (talk) 21:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Merging items

edit

Hallo Crazy1880,

For merging items, you may want to use the merge.js gadget from help page about merging. It has an option "Request deletion for extra items on RfD" to automatically place a request to delete the empytied page. This way of nominating makes it a lot easier for the admins to process the requests.

With regards, -      - (Cycn/talk) 11:40, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin Cycn, thanks for the tip. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 12:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Top 10 primary sources tool users

edit

Hi @Crazy1880,

The primary sources tool status page says that you are the second most active user of the tool, congratulations! If you have not tried it yet, I would like to invite you to activate and play with the FBK-strephit-soccer dataset: it is a small demo dataset to support the StrepHit IEG proposal. I would really appreciate if you could endorse, join (blue buttons), or comment the idea on the proposal page.

Looking forward to your feedback.
Cheers,

--Hjfocs (talk) 09:25, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin Hjfocs, I did not at all, that there are these statistics, thanks for that. I pressed a button and would like to continue to use the tool. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 17:11, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Glad to hear that, @Crazy1880! And thanks a lot for the endorsement. It would be nice to count on you as a power tester of StrepHit datasets. Let me know whether it sounds fine to you and we will keep in touch. Cheers --Hjfocs (talk) 08:16, 23 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hey Hjfocs, I've got a phenomenon. In the "Primary Sources statement list" happened to me no update or refresh. If I click approve or reject, comes the loading bar, but nothing happens. In the object it is assumed. Have you got an idea? Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 09:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Crazy1880, thanks for reporting this, I managed to reproduce the issue. Not only nothing happens, but it also seems that the data in the list is not in sync with the primary sources backend. @Tpt has led the tool development so far, maybe he has more insights.
This does not seem to be a known issue: could you please double check that and open a new one in the tool code repository if needed? Thanks, --Hjfocs (talk) 10:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin Hjfocs, I opened a new issue. Perhaps you could leave a comment there. Thanks and regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 18:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Crazy1880: nice, thanks! Just commented and opened another issue for the lack of sync. Cheers! --Hjfocs (talk) 08:44, 5 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Don't add claims which already exist

edit

See here. Instead of adding it as new claim you should edit the existing one (when it comes to quantifiers). --Jobu0101 (talk) 10:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

By the way, you entered a wrong point in time. You wrote 2008 but it was 2009-02-22. --Jobu0101 (talk) 11:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin Jobu0101, this was then my mistake with the primary source tool. Thanks for checking. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 18:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin. Würdest du den Fehler auch korrigieren? Vielen Dank! --Jobu0101 (talk) 00:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin Jobu0101, sollte korrigiert sein. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 05:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin. Ich glaube, du hast das eigentliche Problem nicht richtig verstanden. Um das zu überprüfen, habe ich es nicht schnell selbst korrigiert, sondern nicht korrigieren lassen. Du hast nun bei dem Claim, welches du vor ein paar Tagen setztest, den Quantifier point in time (P585) angepasst. Den Fehler habe ich erst später bemerkt und dir hier auch separat mitgeteilt. Der eigentlich Fehler war jedoch, das Claim erneut angelegt zu haben. Es gab ja schon ein Claim zu dem Award mit der Property award received (P166). Das heißt, so wie es gerade drin steht, heißt es, dass der Film zweimal den Award Academy Award for Best Animated Feature (Q106800) gewonnen hat, was aber nicht der Wahrheit entspricht. --Jobu0101 (talk) 07:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin Jobu0101, meinst du rein zufällig, dass man "Oskar für den besten animierten Spielfilm - 2009 - Oscarverleihung 2009" mit "Oskar für den besten animierten Spielfilm - 2009 - Andrew Stanton" zusammenführen sollte? Dann mache ich das gerne. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 17:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Genau das meine ich. Bzw. dass man auch demnächst beim Erstellen darauf achtet, ob es schon ein entsprechendes Claim gibt und dann die Information, die man gerade eintragern wollte (in deinem Fall Andrew Stanton) genau dort einträgt. So, wie es derzeit vermerkt ist, bedeutet das nämlich, der Film habe zweimal den "Oskar für den besten animierten Spielfilm" gewonnen. Das hat er aber nicht. --Jobu0101 (talk) 10:17, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin Jobu0101, ich habe das mal zusammengelegt, schau bitte noch mal drüber. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 11:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Vielen Dank, sieht gut aus. Ich habe gerade noch statement is subject of (P805) zu den Nominierungen hinzugefügt. Grundsätzliche Info zu den Oscars: Die potentiellen Gewinner bei Nominierungen sollten, wie ich finde, auch eingetragen werden. Hier wird gerade etwas diskutiert, wie das passieren soll. Man ist sich noch nicht so ganz einig, bzw. scheint es keine ideale Property dafür zu geben, vielleicht muss sie noch erstellt werden. Winner passt ja nicht bei einer Nominierung. Siehe übrigens auch Alle mit einem Oscar ausgezeichneten Filme. --Jobu0101 (talk) 12:09, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ich habe die Seite noch etwas ausgebaut. Gefällt sie dir? Hast du noch Verbesserungsvorschläge? --Jobu0101 (talk) 22:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Mir ist gerade bei Joel Grey (Q316641) aufgefallen, dass der Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor wieder doppelt eingetragen ist. Das müsstest du vor zwei Tagen gewesen sein. --Jobu0101 (talk) 17:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin Jobu0101, ich habe den Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Director of a Play 1972 gefunden, meintest du den? Ja, bei vielen Einträgen denkt das Programm leider nicht so mit. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin. Nein, ich meinte Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor (Q106291). Der heißt auf Deutsch "Oscar für den besten Nebendarsteller". Ich habe Wikidata auf Englisch eingestellt, daher habe ich dir immer den englischen Titel genannt. Du hast es auf Deutsch stehen? --Jobu0101 (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Moin Moin Jobu0101, ja, ich habe Wikidata aus deutsch eingestellt, verfolge aber auch englisch und niederländisch, wonach ich auch Suchen ausgelegt habe. Zusätzlich editiere ich auch in diesen Sprachen und mache Übernahmen. Das was zu meintest, habe ich gefunden und umgeändert. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 06:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Q2897437

edit

Moin! Da besteht nur Namensgleichheit. Der französische Artikel beschreibt einen kanadischen Schriftsteller, der in Nordafrika geboren wurde, nicht einen französischen Harfenspieler aus Belfort. NNW (talk) 12:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin NNW, vielen Dank für die Info und die entsprechende Änderung. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 12:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I rollback you edits (ISBN etc) in Стихотворения М. Л. Михайлова (Q15919422). This book was published in 1862... -- Sergey kudryavtsev (talk) 10:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin Sergey kudryavtsev, thank you --Crazy1880 (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Encyclopaedia Metallum

edit

Greetings! When mixing and matching the Encyclopaedia Metallum band ID (P1952)’s, please don’t add multiple identifiers to the same item unless the band actually has multiple Encyclopaedia Metallum pages. Matching must be done by comparing for example album and band member names between the Wikipedia articles and the EM page, not just by band name. There’s now a bunch of violations at Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P1952. Actually, not all of the listed items are even bands, for example matricide (Q1136456) and a Norse deity (Q1136300) are now linked (twice) with the property. I can fix the violations, but please be more careful in the future. Thanks. –Kooma (talk) 07:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin Kooma, oh sorry, that was clearly my mistake. These were my first attempts in this tool at all. I try to pay more attention to the statements. Thank you for changing. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 15:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Moller Motor Car Company

edit

Hallo Crazy1880, Du bist mir zugekommen. Du hast https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q48306449 angelegt und ich anschließend https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q48307581. Wie kann meine Seite wieder gelöscht werden? --Buch-t (talk) 12:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin @Buch-t:, habe ich mal gestellt. Du kannst in deinen Einstellungen hier unter Helferlein folgendes anhaken RequestDeletion, dann bekommst du es oben die Leiste mit angezeigt, dass du das auch könntest. mfg --Crazy1880 (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Interessante Sache. Habe ich aktiviert. --Buch-t (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

MusicBrainz IDs

edit

Hi Crazy1880 - grateful if you'd take a quick look at https://twitter.com/WikidataFacts/status/1089600226397208578 and let us know why you've added hundreds of redirect MusicBrainz IDs to items such as Lithium (Q1130059) and Polly (Q1575153). thx --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin Tagishsimon, first of all, I would ask you to delete the Twitter chat regarding my person. Second, you know what the primary-Source-Tool does? It inserts / adds data from Freebase, and yes, hundreds of links to MusicBrainz. At the first time there were no checks for MusicBrainz. With the fact that checks were installed, I was already made aware of it and only add one Link. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 06:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ping for Lydia --Crazy1880 (talk) 06:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
According to the ‏ @MusicBrainz contributor to the thread: "AFAICT they're only available through the database dumps and clearly marked as redirects". Will you be rectifying your insertion of the redirects? --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:20, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Moin Tagishsimon, I have no influence on the dump, so I could only delete everything manually, unless you have a faster way? Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 10:32, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
I guess if the dump specifies that an ID is a redirect, you could extract the list of redirects from the dump and remove them? --Tagishsimon (talk) 10:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
No idea Tagishsimon, please ask the programmer, I'm only an user. If you wish, I'll do it manually. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 12:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Q58416611

edit

Hi, i wanted you to look into https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q58416611 page, how can we improve this page? I have added image with approved OTRS permission, kindly help me to improve the page. --Vrisle (talk) 01:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your recent category imports

edit

Moin Moin (can I use that phrase too?), it seems that the category items you recently created have an incorrect P31 ('Category:1972 in Zaire' instead of 'Wikimedia category'). You may wish to correct this and make sure that such a blunder doesn't occur in later imports. Mahir256 (talk) 06:47, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin Mahir256, sure, feel free to use. But first thank you for dropping out, that there's something wrong. There was a stupid copy and paste error on my part. I corrected the corresponding elements. Thanks and Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 07:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Categories and languages

edit

When you start a new page, that is a category, you can just go to "automatic addition". Then, under "parameters" you go to "lists" and choose "Wikipmedia category". Then you go to "update" above and click at "labels" and "descriptions". Then you have labels and descriptions in all languages. J 1982 (talk) 14:47, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Moin Moin J 1982, like we say in good old Germany. But my problem is that I use PetScan and, as far as I know, it can only provide one feature (P31). Do you perhaps have an idea if PetScan can give you all this data directly? Your "automatic addition" I know and use. Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Turkish names

edit

Hi. I saw your edits to Q78360937. His given name is Erşan, and not Ersan. This is not a "script" issue. In Turkish we have many names (both given and/or family n.) with similar spelling, but they are different from each other. Let me give a few examples: Erşan and Ersan, Tuncer and Tunçer, Ergun and Ergün, Sina and Sina, Ümran and Umran, Şenay and Senay, Gülşen and Gülsen and many more. In Turkey we are very accustomed to this. Letters like ü, ö, ç, ş, ı, ğ are part of our alphabet, they are not "special" letters, but ordinary letters. They do not use "diacritic signs". They are this way. The only diacritic sign we used to have almost got lost in time with the use of internet, which is the case of "Celâl" and "Kâzım" etc. Today you may write Celal instead of Celâl but you cannot write Ersan instead of "Erşan". because they are two different names. Best. --E4024 (talk) 00:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Anhorn

edit

Hallo Crazy1880, du hattest bei Anhorn Q39695720 Geokoordinaten angegeben, die nicht zu dem Text des Artikels de:Anhorn (Bad Wurzach) passen. Ich habe die erst mal rausgenommen, vielleicht hast du eine Idee was da los ist. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 16:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hat sich erledigt, User:Ahoerstemeier hat weitergeholfen. -- Gerd Fahrenhorst (talk) 16:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Aktualisierung von Einwohnerdaten

edit

Hallo Crazy1880, du hattest die Einbindung von Einwohnerdaten auf der Seite de:Böhmisches Niederland korrigiert, danke. Ich sehe dabei noch ein "Tabellen"-Problem und möchte dich dazu was fragen. Die Tabelle für de:Böhmisches Niederland#Politische Gliederung trägt nur einmal in der Kopfzeile das "aktuelle" Datum, da mir die Angabe in jeder Tabellenzeile als zu viel erschien. Kannst du mir sagen, ob Einwohnerzahlen (in diesem Fall von Orten in Tschechien) "gleichzeitig" auf nen neuen Jahresstand gesetzt werden, sodass dieses handling vertretbar ist? Gruß --Tschips (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply