Wikidata:Property proposal/Archivist palaeographer thesis

archivist palaeographer thesis edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person

Withdrawn

Description	the thesis someone wrote to obtain the archivist palaeographer degree
Represents	Archivist palaeographer thesis (Q46629343)
Data type	Item
Domain	person
Allowed values	[1-9]\d*
Example	Soline Lau-Suchet (Q42308182) → Camille Gaston Kahn (1864-1928) (Q42532095) René Girard (Q129228) → La Vie privée à Avignon dans la seconde moitié du XVe siècle (Q43557606) Georges Bataille (Q207359) → L'Ordre de chevalerie, conte en vers du XIIIe siècle, publié avec une introduction et des notes (Q43648232)
Source	http://theses.enc.sorbonne.fr

Motivation

It would allow to mention archivist palaeographer thesis on their author's item, without using Notable work nor Doctoral thesis properties, which aren't suitable. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 20:39, 23 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Discussion

Notified participants of WikiProject France. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Comment @Nomen ad hoc: If it is different from Ecole des chartes thesis abstract ID (P4465), please provide an example.Thanks David (talk) 07:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, David. I did so. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:15, 24 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]
  - Support It looks like another useful copy with a different datatype.Greetings David (talk) 10:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This needs to be widened. Otherwise, Oppose, as it would be a bit too specific. I'll support a notable work (P800) subproperty if it's broad enough to cover any thesis (Q1266946) worldwide. Thierry Caro (talk) 16:38, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, this is too specific. − Pintoch (talk) 16:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bon, eh bien je crois que je ne vais pas avoir d'autre choix que d'utiliser la propriété Doctoral thesis (en la qualifiant systématiquement comme thèse d'AP, pour éviter la confusion avec une thèse doctorale)... Nomen ad hoc (talk) 22:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose I would advocate widening the scope of academic thesis (P1026). ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 00:11, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I completely agree with you, ChristianKl. That's what Pintoch proposed, but there was no reaction (except from me). So, how can we do? (And a merry Christmas!) Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]
I raised the issue of expanding on the talk page and pinged the Source Metadata project. It would be good to have support votes and in case nobody objects we can change the scope after a week. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 12:55, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, my English is quite broken... I'm not sure I could clearly expound that issue there. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]
That's okay, I think you can still gives your support vote. Otherwise it's simply a matter of waiting a bit. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 14:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Waiting for what?? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:41, 25 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Whether there are any objections to changing the scope of the property. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 15:23, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK! And how give up this proposal? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 15:49, 25 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Proposals get withdrawn by writing "status = withdrawn" into the template. I did that here for you. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 16:08, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Christian. Mahir256 (talk) 01:57, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I did not know it already existed. Thierry Caro (talk) 03:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thierry Caro, tu as déjà dit que tu étais opposé plus haut ;). (Et joyeux Noël !) Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Oppose Duplicate David (talk) 06:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]