Wikidata:Property proposal/Nombre annuel de passagers
yearly patronage edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Transportation
Not done
| Description | number of yearly passengers, patrons or visitors in specified year |
|---|---|
| Data type | Number (not available yet) |
| Template parameter | domestique/international/total |
| Domain | Q55488, Q728937, Q924286, , Q62447, Q1067164 |
| Allowed values | entre 0 et 6250000 |
| Allowed units | 1 |
| Example 1 | Sydney Airport (Q17581) → 1985 = 6 378 034 (domestique), 2 772 120 (international), 9 150 154 (total) |
| Example 2 | Sydney Airport (Q17581) → 1990 = 7 531 145 (domestique), 4 264 091 (international), 11 795 236(total) |
| Example 3 | MISSING |
| Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) |
| See also | daily patronage (P1373) patronage (P3872) |
Motivation edit
Peuplement avec jeux de données sur les passagers aériens (donnée souvent à l'année, souvent découpée en international/domestique/ total Bouzinac (talk) 22:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- @Bouzinac: why isn't patronage (P3872) enough? With the appropriate qualifiers it seems unambiguous to me - and you would need qualifiers for this one anyway. − Pintoch (talk) 23:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose Use patronage (P3872) David (talk) 08:32, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, but why does this one daily patronage (P1373) exists on a daily basis? Bouzinac (talk) 08:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Subject of property proposal is not exists on daily basis. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Look at this Craeybeckxtunnel (Q201337), it has patronage (P3872) specifying point in time (P585)=2016 , valid in period (P1264)=day (Q573), so what's the difference between using patronage (P3872) and daily patronage (P1373) ?
- Plus have a look at this one Los Angeles International Airport (Q8731). Let's suppose we have three figures, one international, one domestic, and one total, how would it be parametered ? Bouzinac (talk) 09:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Bouzinac: I think my comment below might be helpful. (I was the proposer for patronage (P3872).) Jc86035 (talk) 12:03, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Subject of property proposal is not exists on daily basis. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 17:55, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, but why does this one daily patronage (P1373) exists on a daily basis? Bouzinac (talk) 08:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose not needed, but we need a clear structure for qualifier for patronage (P3872). And daily patronage (P1373) should probably be deleted as it's a duplicate (and replace with correct qualifiers, obviously). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:22, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: It's not a duplicate; patronage (P3872) is pax per period, and daily patronage (P1373) is pax per day in a period. A qualifier could technically replace it, but there are a fair amount of other redundant properties (e.g. author (P50), which could be considered redundant to contributor to the creative work or subject (P767) plus qualifier and preferred rank). Jc86035 (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose; duplicate of patronage (P3872). Jc86035 (talk) 12:01, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Bouzinac, Pintoch, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, ZI Jony, Jc86035, VIGNERON: I'm marking this proposal as not done as there's already another property that fulfills the subject and because of the number of oppositions to its creation. Ederporto (talk) 16:24, 13 April 2019 (UTC)