Wikidata:Property proposal/conductor for
conductor for edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
Not done
| Description | the subject allows the object to flow through |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Example 1 | gas pipe (Q55753892): pipe for the passage of gas → gas (Q11432): fundamental state of matter in which constituent particles are widely separated with weak intermolecular bonds |
| Example 2 | artery (Q9655): blood vessel that carries oxygenated blood away from the heart to other organs rather than lungs → blood (Q7873): organic fluid which transports nutrients throughout the organism |
| Example 3 | electrical conductor (Q124291): material that allows the flow of electrical current → electricity (Q12725): physical phenomena associated with the presence and flow of electric charge |
Motivation edit
I was searching for a way to express that blood flows through arteries and found that we currently lack a property to describe this relation. I'm not 100% sure that conductor is the best word and open to other suggestions. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:13, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Physics
Notified participants of WikiProject Medicine
Discussion edit
Comment why not adapt that carries (P2505) property ? They don't have same fields but look to be carrying same idea. Bouzinac 💬●✒️●💛 17:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Given the examples of the property it seems to be something different. Tioga Pass (Q2436036) carries (P2505) California State Route 120 (Q758090) but Tioga Pass (Q2436036) <conductor for> motor car (Q1420) would match the relationship in my proposed property. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 21:32, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Oppose contains (P4330) and has use (P366) pipeline transport (Q725864)/electric power transmission (Q200928)/blood circulation (Q14852003)/etc would suffice? --Dhx1 (talk) 15:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- has use (P366) is a very unspecific property. Furthermore blood circulation (Q14852003) isn't even linked to blood (Q7873). ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 17:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Comment "Conductor" is also quite an ambiguous term in English (could be a music director, an official on a public transport vehicle, or several other meanings). So some better label would be important if this was to be created. ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:49, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Not done Lacks consensus. JesseW (talk) 19:15, 18 March 2021 (UTC)