Wikidata:Property proposal/music video
music video
editOriginally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Description | short film integrating this song with imagery |
---|---|
Represents | music video (Q193977) |
Data type | Item |
Domain | songs or singles |
Allowed values | instances of music video (Q193977) |
Example 1 | Gangnam Style (Q890) → Gangnam Style (Q17747156) |
Example 2 | Despacito (Q28572509) → Despacito (Q63183401) |
Example 3 | Shape of You (Q59162147) → Shape of You (Q63237372) |
Motivation
editThere seems to be a gap per discussion with @Kam Solusar: on Wikidata talk:WikiProject Movies (Add your motivation for this property here.) --- Jura 09:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Support David (talk) 07:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Makes sense, perhaps @Jc86035, Moebeus: would be interested. Mahir256 (talk) 16:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Very much interested, thanks for the heads up! Moebeus (talk) 16:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support Trivialist (talk) 22:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support I'm usually in favor of using broader properties rather than ones with quite narrow applications, but I don't see a good way to model the relationship between singles/songs and their official music videos with our currently available properties. So this seems like something we definitely need. --Kam Solusar (talk) 12:57, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:52, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- Question Is this for only official music videos, or any video integrating the song? --Yair rand (talk) 18:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Yair rand: It would make sense to restrict its use to official music videos; I believe there was an objection to the creation of YouTube playlist ID (P4300) unless such a stipulation were added. Mahir256 (talk) 20:42, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Kam Solusar, Jura1, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Mahir256: @Moebeus, Trivialist, Pigsonthewing, Yair rand: Done ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Very happy about this so thank you all involved, but the inverse based on constraint is weird, no? Moebeus (talk) 20:53, 30 April 2019 (UTC)