Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/08/04
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Jean-Robert Bisaillon (Q3169940): Canadian musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
I don't see any relevance to the current status of the data object. Although the data object has many identifiers, none of these identifiers make it relevant. Gymnicus (talk) 08:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Keep He published this book [1] in 2008. Fralambert (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Fralambert: One book should make him relevant? Why? --Gymnicus (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Gymnicus The book was not a autopublication. He have published at least 10 works according his VIAF. Thar make him at least notable for as structural need. Fralambert (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Fralambert: So books that are not autopublished are relevant per se. Do I understand this in the right manner? --Gymnicus (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it was what I said. At least all creator with a notable work, or at least relevent work sould be notable. Not being notable in a wiki (like frwiki in this case) don't means that he his not notable here. Fralambert (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- +1 and I may add that one book or autopublication may also be enough for Wikidata notability. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, it was what I said. At least all creator with a notable work, or at least relevent work sould be notable. Not being notable in a wiki (like frwiki in this case) don't means that he his not notable here. Fralambert (talk) 21:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Fralambert: So books that are not autopublished are relevant per se. Do I understand this in the right manner? --Gymnicus (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Gymnicus The book was not a autopublication. He have published at least 10 works according his VIAF. Thar make him at least notable for as structural need. Fralambert (talk) 20:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Fralambert: One book should make him relevant? Why? --Gymnicus (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per points 2 and 3 of WD:N. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 18:41, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done Notable. --Fralambert (talk) 01:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Fagradalsfjall (Q31749139): mountain in Iceland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Is duplicate for Q27007649 (Fagradalsfjall (Austurland)) --Kuhni74 (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by User:Fralambert, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q20473240: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted trivia in TR WP. E4024 (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 02:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107745589: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Created by mistake --Canaan (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed with a merge.--Canaan (talk) 18:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Merged with Q107745595 --Fralambert (talk) 01:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Soviet occupation of Latvia in 1940 (Q105319079): 1940 military occupation of the Republic of Latvia by the Soviet Union: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Интервики перенесены в Q718738. --Timur Rossolov (talk) 15:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Fralambert, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107858948: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty Item وسام/Wisam (talk) 01:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107715172: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Nonsense item Hjart (talk) 07:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107714145: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Nonsense item Hjart (talk) 07:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107711788: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fake nonsense item Hjart (talk) 07:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107696057: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 14:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Wait Has sco.wp sitelink. --Emu (talk) 21:38, 29 July 2021 (UTC)- Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q106904785: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 20:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106916980: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
I created this, but now realise it is best represented by approved by (P790) with Free Software Foundation (Q48413). --Apairofpears (talk) 23:43, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:50, 20 May 2021 (UTC)- Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Samantha Rajh (Q31271735): Slovene actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted article on slwiki A09090091 (talk) 20:40, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done placed in Hidden Forever (Q31271758) (with sitelink) --Emu (talk) 20:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Grega Golavšek (Q31271736): Slovene film actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted article on slwiki A09090091 (talk) 20:41, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done placed in Hidden Forever (Q31271758) (with sitelink) --Emu (talk) 20:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Milo Goj (Q107207481): Italian art critic and contemporary art historian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No have notable. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 15:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per IdRef ID --Emu (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Emu. Check his academic title: "professor" as in English or "professore" in Italian? (Teaches in a university but not necessarily a Prof. We also have "university teacher" item which might be for what he is.) --E4024 (talk) 15:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done --Emu (talk) 20:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q101541185: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
There is no information that this classical composer perform this nursery rhyme --Lovelotz123 (talk) 06:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Q106879470: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any information that wasn’t (1) user-generated (2) paid-for or (3) vanity journalism / branded content. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 20:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Paul Allard (Q106878559): Co-founder and CEO of impak Finance: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? Emu (talk) 20:40, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Not done per WD:N because of link to impak Finance (Q27118374) (with sitelink) --Emu (talk) 20:05, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Hossein Rahmani Manesh (Q104700992): Iranian Actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Cross-wiki spam; sitelinks need to be deleted Mahir256 (talk) 03:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Keep ISNI 0000 0005 0261 5911, Google Knowledge Graph ID /g/11frj79wh3, IMDb ID nm11083042, Instagram username hosseinrahmanimanesh, Kinopoisk person ID 6160149, Kinorium person ID 5410155, Open Media Database person ID 262435, TMDb person ID 3131865 - WD has properties for several identifier systems of third party databases in which information regarding that person is stored. WD is a connector hub for human data. Even if Wikipedias decide to delete, there is no reason to delete the person in WD. 78.54.165.106 15:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment yes, I agree what you're saying but there is no news sources about him. At least, I couldn't see. If you have any, please don't hesitate to share with us. --Palaangelino (talk) 13:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done because there is no sign that the sitelinks will be deleted anytime soon --Emu (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107393295: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 15:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Aditya Mukarji (Q101468951): Indian climate activist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable person Bodhisattwa (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Sitelinks (WD:N #1), independent coverage by Deutsche Welle (WD:N #2) --Emu (talk) 21:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per Emu. EN:WP has deleted his article but that means nothing. --E4024 (talk) 01:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done --Emu (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Qixxit (Q62027762): Travel booking application, website: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty. de-article was deleted. --Dandelo (talk) 11:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- Keep independent coverage (see links) --Emu (talk) 21:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done --Emu (talk) 20:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier (Q53537920): Spanish sculptor and writer is just cross-wiki spam. Therefore, I request it for deletion. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 06:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Alfa-ketosav: first we need to wait until all sitelinks are deleted (there is still 25 so far) you can't delete a Wikidata item before Wikipedia articles, so at least Wait. Then, the way it was created is bad but the person seems notable enough per Wikidata rules, so I'm leaning more toward Keep. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:45, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- There's also 1 Wikiquote link. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 07:05, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done After several weeks, there’s no sign that all sitelinks will be deleted. --Emu (talk) 20:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107474178: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability Toastskat (talk) 10:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Q107481329: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. Aranya (talk) 06:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- We do not even have an item for "Basib". Delete. --E4024 (talk) 00:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Q107278126: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Cannot be kept in the current state because the data object does not contain any sources at all. Gymnicus (talk) 10:21, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Gymnicus: Are you sure? I do see a source (Frühneolithische Funde von Friesack 4, Lkr. Havelland (Land Brandenburg), und Uhyst 13, Lkr. Görlitz (Freistaat Sachsen), und ihr kulturelles Umfeld (Q107507449)), albeit used with the wrong property. --Emu (talk) 09:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Emu: I can't tell you whether that is proof or not. But apart from this (maybe) source there are no other sources or what did your “famous” short Google search result say? --Gymnicus (talk) 19:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Gymnicus: Die Quelle sieht schon ziemlich vertrauenswürdig aus – in der Archäologie kommt man mit Google oft nicht besonders weit und muss auf Offlinequellen zurückgreifen. Ich habe die präsumtive Erstellerin des Items kontaktiert. --Emu (talk) 23:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Gymnicus: This item was created for the Wikidata:WikiProject Prähistorische Keramik which received funding from the Fellow-Programm of Wikimedia Germany. This of course does not imply notability per se, but I was able to see the source for the item and did some modeling. I’m not an archeologist, but the source seems pretty serious to me and the sherd seems to, well, exist, so I would Keep it. --Emu (talk) 15:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Gymnicus: This item was created for the Wikidata:WikiProject Prähistorische Keramik which received funding from the Fellow-Programm of Wikimedia Germany. This of course does not imply notability per se, but I was able to see the source for the item and did some modeling. I’m not an archeologist, but the source seems pretty serious to me and the sherd seems to, well, exist, so I would
- @Gymnicus: Die Quelle sieht schon ziemlich vertrauenswürdig aus – in der Archäologie kommt man mit Google oft nicht besonders weit und muss auf Offlinequellen zurückgreifen. Ich habe die präsumtive Erstellerin des Items kontaktiert. --Emu (talk) 23:16, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Emu: I can't tell you whether that is proof or not. But apart from this (maybe) source there are no other sources or what did your “famous” short Google search result say? --Gymnicus (talk) 19:46, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Not done per above – nobody disputed it after some time. --Emu (talk) 20:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107693033: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q106088787: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Page recreated by a sockpuppet CrystalLemonade (talk) 00:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:41, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
- Who created the item is not important; we should discuss and decide whether he is notable. (BTW sometimes I tend to think our notability criteria may need a revision. In today's world many newspapers or internet sites make news about or interviews with not notable people on a paid basis, while many talented artists cannot find themselves a place in those same so-called independent sources. We must introduce some sort of evaluation of one's work, by us, Wikidatans, we are not in a CoI. I know almost no-one from Dominican Republic, do you? We can well be a jury to say if we find him/his music notable as a work of art/ist.) --E4024 (talk) 00:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Promotional articles aren’t generally considered to be a reliable source. Also, we have 503 Dominican musicians, that’s more than a fifth of all Dominicans on Wikidata. But I agree that Wikidata has a strong eurocentric bias – as do many Wikipedia language editions. That’s something we need to focus more of our energy onto. But I don’t think the alternative should be to establish notability by ourselves: Wikidata is a bunch of mostly anonymous internet guys, we are hardly in a position to create notability out of thin air. --Emu (talk) 15:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107749824: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable --Kleinpecan (talk) 14:27, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete Found nothing except on youtube. Fralambert (talk) 01:54, 4 August 2021 (UTC)- Deleted by -revi (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:51, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107788364: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam, non-notable Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107862871: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q105763598: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Repeat spam - somehow during previous deletion requests, we missed this one Snackmurat (talk) 12:48, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107742485: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable/spam --1857a (talk) 14:01, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q63542114: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable --1857a (talk) 14:11, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107710684: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No notability; no sources, Might be a hoax, Sjö (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q107683423: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No notability because no sources to be found, might be a hoax since it's created bu IP sock of vandal LiliaMiller2002 Sjö (talk) 18:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Q72865511: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No need to create an item for a blog post in a non-notable Wordpress blog Born2bgratis (talk) 08:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Don't seem to have external sources about the notability of this work. Fralambert (talk) 00:01, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete Is spam Fmarioivan
- Deleted on August, 4th. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 18:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)