Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/08/09
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Stathis Kefallonitis (Q107611685): marketing expert: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam page not notable --2409:4052:908:688:7905:C7FD:7E09:4C5E 04:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done already decided Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/08/07 – no new arguments to consider --Emu (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Q108003674: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty Item وسام/Wisam (talk) 06:19, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Post Office Protocol (Q86007485): family of Internet mail protocols: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate with Q1268005. --Anonymous Agent (talk) 10:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Q108017152: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable organization Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Q108016828: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable Bodhisattwa (talk) 16:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Q90926116: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Whoever created this page is just trying to promote himself! Knowing that he never achieves noticeability, and he is just trying to promote himself and this is against the policies of Wikipedia and Wikidata Osps7 (talk) 06:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
Keep, Keep as the item contains authority control IDs like ISNI and other references, and the deletion request was made by the user "Osps7" after he deleted those properties, "Osps7" was warned before for such vandalism acts in arwiki, like here --Wahid79 (talk) 16:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Wahid79: ISNI isn’t enough for notability as it can be easily obtained without proof of anything. The other identifiers look user-generated. I can’t find any references. Doesn’t look notable if there isn’t anything else. --Emu (talk) 16:56, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Delete. I don't see any substantiation of notability. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Comment the occupation (P106) property has a lot of references, some seems valid (and thus make this item notable per point 2 of WD:N) but can someone reading arabic check them? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- and does anyone have a radio or tv that they can listen to these posted songs and videos to make sure they aren't someone's TikTok's. Snackmurat (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Snackmurat This person is the one who writes about himself!
He is unknown in his country and has no fame and does not have any notice, and he has previously tried to write about himself on the Arabic Wikipedia and we have deleted the article, because it is against the biographical policy --Osps7 (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Q107647369: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
WD:N Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 17:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
Wait has sitelink --Emu (talk) 10:38, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:21, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Abayomi (Q60866568): male given name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable 105.112.117.108 14:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Relevance is clearly given. Several data objects are linked to the name. --Gymnicus (talk) 15:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Not done per Gymnicus. Part of a strange series of blanked items, sometimes with a RfD. --Emu (talk) 17:25, 9 August 2021 (UTC)