Wikidata

Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/King jakob c 2 3

< Wikidata:Requests for permissions‎ | Administrator

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

✓ Done, clear consensus (16/1/0 | 94.117647058824%). Vogone talk 21:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

King jakob c 2 3 edit

Vote
RfP scheduled to end after 5 October 2013 21:19 (UTC)

I'm back again. I believe that I have addressed the concerns raised in my last RFA (back in July). I don't think I've done anything stupid in the two months since then. I also addressed the misunderstanding of the notability policy (a concern in my last RFA) many weeks ago, pretty much right after the last RFA. I have made a total of over 5700 edits and filed well over 500 RFDs. Thank you for your consideration, --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 21:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Votes edit

  1.  Support Looks like the user has addressed concerns raised in the last RfA. Good luck! Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support per last time. Legoktm (talk) 21:26, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support - Nothing's happened since I supported the last RfA that would cause me to change my mind. TCN7JM 21:27, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Oppose I'm still not convinced you have the maturity/judgement for adminship.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    That's ridiculous. What's he going to do? Delete the main page? zOMG. Legoktm (talk) 21:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I fear he might make a bad block or other decision. By a bad block, I don't mean something like blocking Jimbo, but I think he might do admin actions in situations that don't warrant them.--Jasper Deng (talk) 21:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    You mean like all admins do from time to time? TCN7JM 21:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Obviously has a lot of dedication to the project, and I think that the candidate has learned from the past. --Rschen7754 22:05, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support, per my nomination in the last RFA. --Izno (talk) 22:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Adminship is not big deal. I think He will be helpful admin --DangSunM (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support Rzuwig► 09:38, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support surely, why not? WorldTraveller101 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Tobias1984 (talk) 20:08, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 21:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support Sure. The Anonymouse (talk) 03:51, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support--Vyom25 (talk) 06:13, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support — StevenJ81 (talk) 16:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Setuju -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 21:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support - Jakob has historically not been the project's most maturely behaved user, although it's worth noting that the thing that sticks with me was the ridiculous signature he used to have, rather than anything that was actually harmful. However in each RfA (this being his third) he has shown definite improvements. One of the things that bothers me about RfA on English Wikipedia is the tendency of some people to say in one RfA "I can't support you because you're doing XYZ" and then in the next RfA for those people to say "You fixed XYZ, but I can't support you because you used to do XYZ". That's a thinking that I don't want to bring over. Jakob has pretty much addressed the concerns we had about him from previous RfAs, and is an active user that works in areas where the mop would be useful. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:24, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Would be good to have Jacob on the team to help with deletions. If anyone is concerned, they can monitor behaviour in case anything like this happens. Everyone can learn from past mistakes. Del♉sion23 (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments edit

  • ...
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Administrator/King_jakob_c_2_3&oldid=1102158660"