Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Oversight/Stryn 2
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- I hereby confirm community approval of this request. Awaiting flagging by stewards. Vogone talk 07:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Flagged by Ruslik0. Congratulations! --Glaisher [talk] 07:58, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I hereby confirm community approval of this request. Awaiting flagging by stewards. Vogone talk 07:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 30 September 2013 07:34 (UTC)
- Stryn (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hi all, I've been administrator on Wikidata since November 2012, and I've made over 50,000 edits. I feel that I'm trusted enough to this task. I hope that you can agree with me. Since we now have two local oversighters, which both are on timezone -7, it would be very good to have also some European/African/Asian oversighter(s). I'm on timezone +2 UTC, and on summer (now, till end of October) on +3 UTC. Alongside Wikidata I am an administrator on the Finnish Wikipedia. I don't have experience about being an oversighter, but I know what it is, when it should be used, and so on. --Stryn (talk) 07:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
First nomination: Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Oversight/Stryn
Votes
edit- Support Two OS in same timezone may be inconvinient. by ReviDiscussSUL Info at 08:10, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Glaisher [talk] 08:21, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No concerns. --Rschen7754 08:48, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I trust Stryn as an Oversighter. TCN7JM 12:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Ajraddatz (Talk) 13:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support In addition, 2 may be inadequate.--Jasper Deng (talk) 15:36, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 17:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Danrok (talk) 02:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--GZWDer (talk) 10:50, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Rzuwig► 15:31, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support The previous request failed simply due to a lack of enough support, and any previous concerns are no longer relevant. The Anonymouse (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support StevenJ81 (talk) 21:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--Vyom25 (talk) 05:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Yup! I'm coming. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 13:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support of cource. --DangSunM (talk) 22:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I thought I supported this several days ago... Sven Manguard Wha? 19:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Same as Sven. — ΛΧΣ21 04:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 02:01, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Rippitippi (talk) 15:40, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral In their Deletions log here, RevDel actions seem few and far between ([1]). I would really expect more evidence of prior involvement with RevDel, or with interaction with the OS system, or some such relevant experience. If someone could review their RevDels either here or at fi:, perhaps I would be swayed. It Is Me Here t / c 11:32, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry, but no competition "Who hides most revisions?" has started here on Wikidata, yet. :) We prefer to keep content visible here, unless it is really required to hide it (or requested in case of revealed IP addresses). Thus, we have probably no admin who has a really high density of revision deletions in his deletion log and I guess we also delete far more pages here than in other projects which makes a high revdel density in the logs rather impossible. The revision deletions by Stryn seem to be all okay, by the way (also confirmed by Jafeluv on fiwiki). Kind regards, Vogone talk 11:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I was elected as an oversighter with 12 revision deletions... --Rschen7754 22:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sorry, but no competition "Who hides most revisions?" has started here on Wikidata, yet. :) We prefer to keep content visible here, unless it is really required to hide it (or requested in case of revealed IP addresses). Thus, we have probably no admin who has a really high density of revision deletions in his deletion log and I guess we also delete far more pages here than in other projects which makes a high revdel density in the logs rather impossible. The revision deletions by Stryn seem to be all okay, by the way (also confirmed by Jafeluv on fiwiki). Kind regards, Vogone talk 11:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I trust him :) --Sotiale (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, hopefully we will get more votes coming in the remaining hours.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I see no issue with the candidate. John F. Lewis (talk) 13:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Wiki13 talk 20:34, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --ValterVB (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 21:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support because "why now :(". --Izno (talk) 21:45, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
edit- Since you answered the standard questions last time I won't ask them again, but is that information up to date? --Rschen7754 07:47, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- For your questions: yes, all is up to date. For Sven Manguard's questions: I have now OTRS access for fi-wiki info and sister projects. --Stryn (talk) 08:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]