Property talk:P10643

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Kirilloparma in topic Difference from P1638

Documentation

code name
code word or name used, sometimes clandestinely, to refer to another name, word, project, or person; mainly for military purposes, or in espionage
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10643#Scope, hourly updated report, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10643#Entity types, hourly updated report
Citation needed: the property must have at least one reference (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10643#citation needed
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10643#Single value, SPARQL

Difference from P1638

edit

How is this different from working title (P1638)? While this says it's limited to people, the description has been expanded to include "projects". working title (P1638) is specifically about written works, however the examples include movies which are also "projects"?

Which should I use for the Nintendo Wii, which was referred to as "Revolution" internally during development. This was likely a combination of hiding details of it as well as because a final name might not have been decided yet. So it's unclear which would be appropriate here (or for situations where both might in fact apply). BasilicumTree (talk) 08:30, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Fair observation. As far as I can see the property was also created with some irregularities and it would be appropriate to nominate the property for deletion in first place, which I have already done. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 04:21, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Return to "P10643" page.