Property talk:P2679
Documentation
person who wrote the preface, foreword, or introduction of the book but who isn't an author of the rest of the book
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2679#Type Q49848, Q3331189, Q47461344, Q108329152, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2679#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2679#Scope, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P2679#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
Recommended qualifier edit
Qualifier has edition or translation (P747) is recommended with this property if editions of the work have their own items. If editions do not have their own items, another unique identifier such as ISBN-13 (P212) may be used to qualify the property. Swpb (talk) 19:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Constraint P106 Q19839393 edit
Hi y'all,
I'm wondering: is the constraint occupation (P106) preface author (Q19839393) really a good idea? I mean preface author (Q19839393) is not really a occupation (P106), only stricto sensu or anecdotically, these people are not "known" to be preface author (Q19839393) and it would be hard to find a reference for that.
Meanwhile, for the numbers, for 426 uses of this property there is 389 constraint violations… Obviously, we can add the occupation (P106) automatically but that brings us back to my first point, is it really something we want?
Pinging the top users of this property and the person who added this constraint: @Manu1400, Ambre Troizat, Envlh, Newnewlaw, Ankry:
Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- I think the constraint is wrong and unneeded. Being preface author (Q19839393) is most often an accidental activity. Ankry (talk) 08:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, every one !
- I do think the same that Ankry : being a "prefacier" is most often an accidental activity. For myself, you can take it off. Thanks a lot. --Ambre Troizat (talk) 17:55, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that preface author (Q19839393) should not be considered as an occupation (P106). The property occupation (P106) should be used for something that made the person notable by the sources, not something that is anecdotal. — Envlh (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Manu1400, Ankry, Ambre Troizat, Envlh: in 2+ weeks: 3 in favor, 0 opposition; I removed this constraint. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:31, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Consolidation into P50? edit
This property strikes me a s a little over-specialised. There are many parts of a book or other text that may have a specific author (some books will have different authors for each chapter). Would it not be more versatile to use author (P50) with the qualifier that it applies to part (P518) foreword (Q1358138)? T.Shafee(evo&evo) (talk) 02:56, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Property for deletion edit
This was listed at Wikidata:Properties for deletion/P2679, but kept. --- Jura 10:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Gender neutral labels in French edit
Following this request for comments, the French label now includes the male and the female form. PAC2 (talk) 18:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)