Tidoni

Babel user information
de-N Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache. en-2 This user has intermediate knowledge of English.
Users by language

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason. Tidoni block log • ipblocklist • crossblock • luxo's • unblock • remove gblock • contribs: +/-

---

Request reason:

Affected by IP block, requesting IP block exemption

Decline reason:

per discussion below. --Rschen7754 18:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

---

беларуская (тарашкевіца) | български | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | français | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | svenska | 中文 | +/−

You did edit after having posted this message. Is the exemption still needed?--Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

No, i requested an exemption for all projects at meta, so i think this one isn't needed anymore. --Tidoni (talk) 10:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

User:TidoniBot

Why do you pull info from IMDb while that user-generated site is considered to be an unreliable source of info? The Banner talk 11:20, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

If there is another source saying something different, the imdb info can be marked as deprecated, otherwise you wouldn't be able to add imported from any Wikipedia, hence it is user generated. Or is there something else i am missing? --Tidoni (talk) 11:27, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

I reverted your bot today for a third time in the same object. This birth year is wrong! Please stop making the same edits again and again. --Mirer (talk) 22:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

And you're right: the automated imports of content from any wikipedia is as bad as those from imdb. There will be the time, when Wikidata will have to stop this and verify what get's imported here. --Mirer (talk) 22:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

But then, why not mark it as deprecated, so others don't try to add the date again. By that it is clear that the info from IMDB is not as believable as the other sources, but that a wrong birth date is out there. --Tidoni (talk) 06:50, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Yes, please set incorrects to deprecated rank. Otherwise, people, just as much as bots, may try to add it not knowing that it was already found and deemed incorrect. See Help:Ranking for more information. --- Jura 18:40, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Maybe it would be wise just to don't add bullshit. I don't see any positive in adding content that is plain wrong and stems from an unreliable source.

Bullshit like this will kill the reliability of Wikidata ... --Mirer (talk) 01:00, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

bug report

Your bot add claim which year of value is 0 in Gregorian to several items (example). If birth month and birth day are wrote in source but birth year isn't, use birthday (P3150) instead.--本日晴天 (talk) 11:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed this some days ago and fixed it. Right now this shouldn't happen anymore. --Tidoni (talk) 16:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Gregorian BD

Please refrain from adding Gregorian birthdates when Julian ones are already specified. [1] This actually is the same date, but you add this as an alternative. Your edits are among the worst ones in the project. Sealle (talk) 01:38, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

The Gregorian Birth date is an alternative Birthday-format. If wikidata would calculate the other birthdayformat automatically this would be redundent, but as of now this is not the case. So right now a Gregorian version of the birth date adds some value to the entry. --Tidoni (talk) 09:54, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Your edits will be automatically reverted soon or their status will be degraded to deprecated. Sealle (talk) 09:59, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

• I restored the additions to Q537854. @Sealle: do not delete referenced statements. I also noticed that the reference for the Julian date is actually one for the Gregorian date. --- Jura 03:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

TidoniBot Library of Congress Authorities reference

Hi,

Can TidoniBot add Library of Congress authority ID (P244) in reference when he adds Library of Congress Authorities (Q13219454) as a reference ? It's just easier to check. — eru ^{[Talk] [french wiki]} 07:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, I implemented it and am currently testing it. --Tidoni (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Your bot is broken

He keeps adding wrong dates for birth and death, making double statments and creating annyoing errors. Please stop this bot. HiyoriX (talk) 12:40, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@HiyoriX: Hi, can you give a link to an entry where such an edit was performed? Otherwise it is hard to know what sort of action you are refering to. --Tidoni (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Here some examples: Special:diff/1336770565, Special:diff/1004637224, Special:diff/1306812556, Special:diff/1004666826, Special:diff/1348743711, Special:diff/1348437985, Special:diff/1348359903. The bot sometimes do it's job, but in many cases it does damage. HiyoriX (talk) 16:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@HiyoriX:

Special:diff/1336770565: All the other references state 1988, but on wikidata it says 1987. Correct Edit

Special:diff/1004637224: That edit is over a year old, Find a Grave is no longer being added.

Special:diff/1306812556: 2010 Seems to be the correct year, but in LCCN 2020 is stated. Entry created by the bot should be marked as deprecated.

Special:diff/1004666826: Same as No. 2

Special:diff/1348743711: Not sure what should be wrong with this one.

Special:diff/1348437985: Not sure what should be wrong with this one either.

Special:diff/1348359903: 16. January seems to be the correct date, but LCCN states the 21. so the entry should also be marked as deprecated.

--Tidoni (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Incorrect date parsing

TidoniBot adds the date 1993-02-01 (Special:Diff/1360282292) which does not match the LOC source that it references. Please fix. –LiberatorG (talk) 18:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. I changed the bot and tested it on this example, which he now does not edit anymore. --Tidoni (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Ordinals on episode items

Hi Tidoni,

series ordinal (P1545) on season statements of episodes refer to the number of that episode within the season. I reverted your edit and change it here (it's S4E18, so the ordinal should be 18, not 4). Also, I fixed all episodes of Shameless and Ally McBeal. There are few of yours left at Wikidata:Database_reports/Complex_constraint_violations/P4908#Ordinal_qualifier_would_generally_be_unique_within_season. --- Jura 09:59, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorgfalt bei Anlage neuer Wikidata-Items

Hallo Tidoni, bitte überprüfe deine Änderungen noch einmal, wenn du neue Einträge anlegst. Bitte achte beim Hinzufügen von IDs darauf, dass diese zu dem Wikidata-Eintrag passen. Hier und bei anderen Folgen der Serie fügst du die Netflix-ID der Serie hinzu. Diese ID sollte aber nur bei dem Wikidata-Eintrag zur Serie eingefügt werden. Schau zudem da mal auf den Titel, da sind Unicode-Zeichen nicht korrekt umgeformt, sowas bitte in Zukunft korrigieren. Zudem solltest du bitte prüfen, ob Einträge die du anlegst bereits bestehen. Die Folgen zu Money Heist / Haus des Geldes gab es schon. CENNOXX (talk) 14:07, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Das selbe jetzt bei Folgen von Pretty Little Liars. Bitte vorher prüfen, ob Folgen einer Serie schon existieren, zB mit SPARQL: https://w.wiki/4qjy. CENNOXX (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Jetzt hat es It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia getroffen, da wird & #x27; statt ' in Titel geschrieben. Bitte vor der Anlage solcher Mengen an Episoden vorher über die Daten schauen, wenn da nicht sorgfältig programmiert wird.–CENNOXX (talk) 15:00, 6 March 2024 (UTC)