Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/10/18
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Q114730399: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam, no links to other projects –FlyingAce✈hello 23:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Wägnerstraße 20 (Q114613069): single-family detached home in Dresden: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No notability proven Gymnicus (talk) 16:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hello @Gymnicus in Dresden we work for free data in wikidata. For example we create a wikidata-object for all streets in Dresden. See this article in german about this project. Now I start to create wikidata-infoboxes for all existing commons-categories of all buildings. Why not! (See this searchlink for 800 buildings categories) Is there some rule against this? --sk (talk) 18:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, Wikidata's notability criteria speak against it. The buildings are not notable under any of the three points. That's why I'm all for deletion here.
Delete --Gymnicus (talk) 16:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, Wikidata's notability criteria speak against it. The buildings are not notable under any of the three points. That's why I'm all for deletion here.
- Do not delete. Has also a quiet good commons category with 20 pictures ... Erfurth (talk) 19:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- As above
- It's part of the street project in Dresden. Keep it Z thomas (talk) 20:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep Further the item has at least one valid sitelink to commons! Erfurth (talk) 06:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
Not deleted for the reasons given. --Emu (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Eisenacher Straße 9 (Q114613100): residential building in Dresden: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No notability proven Gymnicus (talk) 16:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- See discussion above. --sk (talk) 18:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Should not be deleted, is part of the Dresden Street Project, background information under https://saxorum.hypotheses.org/6019 Erfurth (talk) 19:22, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- As above
- It's part of the street project in Dresden. Keep it Z thomas (talk) 20:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I agree, every building could have an entry. --RAN (talk) 04:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Further the item has at least one valid sitelink to commons! Erfurth (talk) 06:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
- Not deleted for the reasons given. --Emu (talk) 11:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Q114505411: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Q114733903: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 07:51, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Q114733420: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
L716888: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not a lexeme. I created the item Q114736996 for this person. Sorry for the mistake. --MMFSoftwares (talk) 12:30, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Done by Mahir256 --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Q107299094: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, articles deleted from enwiki and bnwiki. — Haseeb (talk) 13:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Q114731188: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails notability Rockpeterson (talk) 07:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Q114728262: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q15789768: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
The only dab page that existed was on de.wp, and it was redirected. Mackensen (talk) 11:47, 18 October 2022 (UTC)