Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2023/07/01

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q112570558

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Q112570558: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Gymnicus (talk) 10:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Wait SDC usage, RfD: commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Alvi1903 --Emu (talk) 15:11, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Q119225164

Latest comment: 1 year ago8 comments4 people in discussion

Nicole Luisoni (Q119225164): boudoir model: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? BrokenSegue (talk) 21:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Wikidata:Notability:

It contains at least one valid sitelink to a page on Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wikisource, Wikiquote, Wikinews, Wikibooks, Wikidata, Wikispecies, Wikiversity, or Wikimedia Commons.
It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references.

not much different from Cara Susanne Ives (Q109567978), Tanja (Q84427807), possan (Q104650554), Roger Puta (Q91831483), Emjay Rosso (Q110823843), Galina Zhukovskaya (Q27102353), Amy Cay (Q64833798) etc. RZuo (talk) 21:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

@RZuo was the item creator. It is good etiquette to declare that when responding.

This item does have a sitelink, specifically a Commons category page. The category is well-populated. This is sufficient to establish notability under N1.

The items contains only social media identifiers and no references. It's academic, but this does not establish notability under N2. Feel free to add some URLs of news coverage.

If you feel another item lacks notability, you are welcome to report it here. All but your last example also satisfy N1 via a populated Commons category. Amy Cay (Q64833798) does not, but would probably scrape by on the IMDB. Bovlb (talk) 22:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

A fine example indeed why we shouldn’t accept Commons categories as proof of notability. --Emu (talk) 23:34, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

i dont see why i need to make any declaration. my username was mentioned in the edit summary. does wikidata community not expect users to respond? if such declaration is seen as a norm, then the tool used to make deletion request should be modified to write that in the request itself instead of edit summary.

i listed many examples of proper usage of wikidata to store info and links to other websites, especially for concepts that are represented on commons. it's beneficial to use wikidata to store systematic info about these concepts (humans) that exist in the real world. many of the examples i gave all contain only links to some other database/social media kind of websites, like flickr, instagram, modelmayhem, etc.

this particular person has 100+ files on commons, more than many established wiki users/non-wiki users. wikidata should be used to store info for commons. after all, if a file has a single use in wikidata, commons is still bound to host it because it's within commons' scope (aka notability) to do so for wikidata. wikidata should reciprocate for commons.

further, it should be noted that Nicole Luisoni (Q119225164) has been used for structured data on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Q119225164 . deleting such items makes sdc impossible to implement. RZuo (talk) 00:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

@RZuo: Thanks for following up. We appreciate your feedback.

You are not required to declare in (deletion) discussions that you are the item creator, but I do encourage it. While your points stand independently of the person making them, it avoids anyone making any untoward inferences about an undeclared conflict of interest.

@Emu: I am sympathetic to the idea that a Commons category page alone should not be sufficient to establish notability, but that is not how I read our current policy. Bovlb (talk) 01:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

@Bovlb Yes indeed.

Info There is little hope given the uploader and the creator of the Commons category, but I opened an RfD there: commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nicole Luisoni --Emu (talk) 07:53, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Not deleted Commons decided to keep the files and the category because they desperately need more photos of shadow stripes on nude bodies (if I understand correctly). This means notability on Wikidata because that’s the wording of WD:N. I have however deleted most unsourced statements. --Emu (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Q119292788

Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion

FAW V5 (Q119292788): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vandalism page by known vandal. Gikü (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Same situation for:

Gikü (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Not deleted for Q119292788 (merged) and Q118104931 (has sitelink) --Emu (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Emu, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Q108440963

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Q108440963: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? --Dorades (talk) 19:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Q114607438

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Q114607438: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 22:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Q97364369

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Q97364369: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 22:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Delete. Web search does not turn up any third-party coverage. No references. The item's creator has made no other WD edits. Dsp13 (talk) 10:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)