Property talk:P10659

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Amadalvarez in topic Do we really need it ?

Documentation

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Integer: values should be integers (ie. they shouldn't have a fractional part) (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10659#integer, SPARQL
Range from “0” to “500”: values should be in the range from “0” to “500”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10659#Range
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10659#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P10659#Scope, SPARQL

Do we really need it ? edit

@Dr03ramos @MasterRus21thCentury @The-erinaceous-one @TiagoLubiana First of all, I appologize to don't be in the property proposal.

What's the difference with the present solution (1753 items) based on P166=kind of medal + P1114 number of ?, See United States at the 2008 Summer Olympics (Q140185), one of the examples of this new property.

I suggest that before we fill it, we may consider the solution because property:number + qualifier:concept is more difficult to filter than property:concept + qualifier:number.

In any case, what happen with the present content?. Should be migrate, or to keep both solutions ?. Thanks, Amadalvarez (talk) 16:36, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P10659" page.