Property talk:P1618
Documentation
number worn on a player's (competitor's) uniform, equipment, etc
Description | number worn on a player's uniform | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Represents | uniform number (Q599003) | ||||||||||||
Data type | String | ||||||||||||
Template parameter | "clubnumber" in en:template:infobox football biography | ||||||||||||
Domain | According to this template:
persons
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statementshuman (Q5), fictional human (Q15632617), auto racing team (Q20074337), rugby union position (Q6583019) or motorcycle racing team (Q20784907) | ||||||||||||
Allowed values | \d{1,3} | ||||||||||||
Usage notes | qualifier P642 will be migrated to P54 | ||||||||||||
Example | Mario Götze (Q104454) → 19 Saïd Benrahma (Q15082662) → 9 | ||||||||||||
Tracking: same | no label (Q42533399) | ||||||||||||
Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P1618 (Q27478263) | ||||||||||||
Lists | |||||||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
Search for values |
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1618#Type Q5, Q15632617, Q20074337, Q6583019, Q20784907, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1618#Format, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1618#Item P54, search, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1618#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1618#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1618#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
rallying team
editAgainst the documentation and constraints, this property is also used on items about rallying teams. Should we accept that or remove these claims? --Pasleim (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Pasleim: Do you have an example? Yellowcard (talk) 11:41, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hyundai Motorsport #4 (Q23012234), Volkswagen Motorsport #2 (Q23012220) --Pasleim (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- The label and description of the property doesn't fit for that use. Besides that, I don't see any disadvantages. But maybe it would be reasonable to create a new property for rallying teams and add a clearer label and description, then? Yellowcard (talk) 13:09, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- Hyundai Motorsport #4 (Q23012234), Volkswagen Motorsport #2 (Q23012220) --Pasleim (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Specifying team by using a qualifier
editWith respect to sports players, the jersey number of a player is always linked to the team the player is currently part of. Therefore, I suggest to add the specific team by using a qualifier. of (P642) seems to be a good property to do so. Any comments on this suggestion? Yellowcard (talk) 11:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- It would look like this, then. Yellowcard (talk) 11:45, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you want. When the number of a player is linked to a team, we already used of (P642). When this property wasn't used like that (for example, I use P1618 as a qualifier of the musher on sled dog races items), well we didn't. We can't add the use of of (P642) as a constraint because there are many legitimate uses of P1618 where of (P642) can't be used. But yes, of course, if you need to precise the team, by all means, do it. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 17:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Harmonia Amanda: You obviously did understand what I want. :) I just wasn't aware of the fact that it is already be done that way. Thanks for your reply. Yellowcard (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand what you want. When the number of a player is linked to a team, we already used of (P642). When this property wasn't used like that (for example, I use P1618 as a qualifier of the musher on sled dog races items), well we didn't. We can't add the use of of (P642) as a constraint because there are many legitimate uses of P1618 where of (P642) can't be used. But yes, of course, if you need to precise the team, by all means, do it. --Harmonia Amanda (talk) 17:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
This property currently requires the qualifier of (P642), specifying the team or club to which a jersey number applies. As work is underway to deprecate of (P642), I propose that for this use, it be replaced with affiliation (P1416). Can anyone think of a more appropriate alternative property? Swpb (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, that is better. Swpb (talk) 14:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)