out of process deletion
edit
- Is there a reason why this was removed from the items before the deletion was actually decided? The somewhat hasty handling doesn't allow to do analysis on the property. --- Jura 08:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Firstly, the deletion is not 'out of process'. The Proposal ran it's course and was closed after 7 days since the consensus was reached. And secondly, if you have gone through the discussion above, you will find that it was actually a spam that was added in thousands of pages, so it's early removal makes sense. That being said, the deletion discussion is over, if you have any more questions/concerns, please take it to WD:AN. Thanks -- BRP ever 11:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The statements were deleted on February 21, not after 7 days. --- Jura 12:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, by 'deletion' I meant deletion of property and not the removal of property from the items. Anyways, it was a spam.-BRP ever 12:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- That isn't really a criterion for speedy deletion of correctly added statements. Merely removing the formatter URL deactivates the links. I think it would be interesting to retain the list of items concerned somewhere. --- Jura 12:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Eihel: who removed it.-- BRP ever 12:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Most were removed via QS-batch #1645370717696. --Nw520 (talk) 22:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jura1 There is the data regarding the removal of properties from items. Regardless of that, if you want this restored you can start a discussion at WD:AN. This property deletion discussion is closed and I will be making no further comment here.-- BRP ever 00:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Looking at some of the stats, it seems there were 12000+. Can we retrieve these somehow without reverting the batch(es)? If possible, please add the QIDs to Property talk:P9395/qids.
- Please help fix this out-of-process deletion by a non-admin. Also, can we make sure such issues wont re-occur going forward? Hasty removals don't help.
- BTW, I don't seem much of an issue of eventually deleting the property, we just need to be done in the correct order. --- Jura 13:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]