Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2017/06/04
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Template:Zodiac (Q26084261): Wikimedia template: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unused, redundant template on idwiki; has been redirected. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 03:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by Eurodyne, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q8776011: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Another entity with a redirection marked as a disambiguation page --Agabi10 (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q5789576: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Just another ex-disambiguation page converted in a redirect --Agabi10 (talk) 22:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
B.B. Studio (Q30120181): Japanese video game developer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
It already exists at Q11190752. --SharkD (talk) 03:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, would a redirect be better? SharkD (talk) 04:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Please use merging next time. —MisterSynergy (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Empty items from User:AliciaFagervingWMSE-bot
These items (14) have no history and are all empty (159 bytes). Q.Zanden questions? 17:47, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Yes, see me deletion requests above. Queryzo (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
| Extended content |
|---|
|
Empty items from User:AliciaFagervingWMSE-bot Queryzo (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Alicia Fagerving (WMSE): Can you give some insight into these? Can they be deleted, as empty, as requested? Jared Preston (talk) 21:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
All 
Deleted now. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q28949175: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
@Lisp.hippie: what is this item about? Queryzo (talk) 18:52, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by יונה בנדלאק (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q7177341: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Has been deleted in enwiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Peter_Tomasetti Queryzo (talk) 10:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:00, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q29580811: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
@Affom: another empty switzerland item Queryzo (talk) 18:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
can be deleted. Affom (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q7977045: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Has been deleted in enwiki with reason "Zero sources which establish the song's independent notability." Queryzo (talk) 10:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q5668095: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Has been deleted twice at enwiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Cowell Queryzo (talk) 10:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
US Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 5 Handbook 4 (Q19574400): US Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 5 Handbook 4: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
These items contain no interwiki links, are not linked from another item and contain only one statement. This is not useful and notability is also not shown. Steak (talk) 18:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete We do not create items for images from Commons. PokestarFan • Drink some tea and talk with me • Stalk my edits • I'm not shouting, I just like this font! 20:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
@PokestarFan:, please don't just add the delete template. it tagged *this* page for deletion. MechQuester (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- @MechQuester: I forgot that
{{Delete}}is the nomination. I meant to use{{Vd}}. PokestarFan • Drink some tea and talk with me • Stalk my edits • I'm not shouting, I just like this font! 22:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep Manuals given out by the US government are "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entities". ChristianKl (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Whether it's kept or not it should be used document file on Wikimedia Commons (P996) instead of image (P18). Strakhov (talk) 19:43, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- As Commons includes the manual, it's a good reason to keep an item for this publication.
--- Jura 15:19, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Not deleted Sufficiently notable. Lymantria (talk) 16:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Roberto Scaglione (Q3939152): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No article, no real content except what you can deduce from a name Jon Harald Søby (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Not done It has a valid wikilink and as such should not be deleted unless the local article is deleted. The content of the local article is a matter for the local wiki to discuss. The page says there is a legal matter, that is why the page on the local project is temporarily blanked. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 18:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Add Not deleted template to trigger archiving. —MisterSynergy (talk) 16:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Form OF-109 - State-USIA Separation Statement (Q19572046): Form OF-109 - State-USIA Separation Statement: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
These items contain no interwiki links, are not linked from another item and contain only one statement. This is not useful and notability is also not shown. Steak (talk) 18:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep @Steak: The image clearly shows what the item is about and how the item is notable. ChristianKl (talk) 11:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- So single Forms are notable? Steak (talk) 12:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- I think the sitelink to commons makes it notable under (1) of our principles. In this case it's like also a "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity" that it can be described using serious and publicly available references.
- A quick google search provides a bunch of articles talking about this form: http://www.speaker.gov/general/did-secretary-clinton-sign-form-109 , http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/03/16/hillary-state-dept-duck-questions-about-of-109-form/ , http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/415304/coffin-no-question-hillary-committed-felony-if-she-signed-usual-state-dept-exit-forms would be articles that discuss this form. ChristianKl (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- So single Forms are notable? Steak (talk) 12:12, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Not deleted Sufficiently notable. I added an incoming link as well. Lymantria (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q19861950: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
These items contain no interwiki links, are not linked from another item and contain only one statement. This is not useful and notability is also not shown. Steak (talk) 18:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I see no reason why the item should be deleted. "popular type of food" is a straigtforward concept.
- The claim that this items notability hasn't been shown seems wrong. @Steak: If you want to nominate items like this at least ping the people who create the items, so that they are aware of the fact that you want to delete items in which they invested work. ChristianKl (talk) 11:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- I see no evidence of notability here, it fails all three notability criteria. I also don't think it's straightforward: "Popular" is highly subjective because cuisine varies around the world and things which are eaten on a daily basis in one country can be completely unheard of in another. I can imagine people adding data about which foods which are popular in which places, but I can't imagine this item being a suitable way to do it. - Nikki (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Nikki. It's as straightforward as it would be a hypothetic
popular human beingas a subclass of human (Q5) (description: widely known dude). With no external identifiers I think it's not useful. Strakhov (talk) 07:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- I see no evidence of notability here, it fails all three notability criteria. I also don't think it's straightforward: "Popular" is highly subjective because cuisine varies around the world and things which are eaten on a daily basis in one country can be completely unheard of in another. I can imagine people adding data about which foods which are popular in which places, but I can't imagine this item being a suitable way to do it. - Nikki (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
hapantotype (Q19353478): protist assemblage collectively designated as holotype: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
These items contain no interwiki links, are not linked from another item and contain only one statement. This is not useful and notability is also not shown. Steak (talk) 18:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: please improve the item --Pasleim (talk) 08:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: Wiktionary has an entry at "hapantotype"; if you could add anything to this item, Andy, that would be great! Jared Preston (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep under the structural need criterion; needed tomeel, for example en:Chromera velia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- I'm still none the wiser, but have fixed the case (as the term should not have been written with a capital letter). Jared Preston (talk) 09:35, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep under the structural need criterion; needed tomeel, for example en:Chromera velia. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: Wiktionary has an entry at "hapantotype"; if you could add anything to this item, Andy, that would be great! Jared Preston (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Not deleted Sufficiently notable as an official term of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Lymantria (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
school of education (Q29876627): institution devoted to scholarship in the field of education and for training teachers, usually an academic subunit of a university: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
By definition, the purpose of a college is education, so this item is meaningless. Maybe this should be merged with college (Q189004). Jc86035 (talk) 16:05, 2 June 2017 (UTC) I think I misunderstood the meaning of the label, and thought it was just bad English. Should still be merged with another item though. Jc86035 (talk) 10:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- I agree. Jared Preston (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- I’d rather suggest to merge into school of education (Q2120173). The term “college of education” appears in the connected enwiki article. —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- I think the intention behind the item was clearly "colleges that educate teachers". Maybe a merge to school of pedagogy (Q7691226). The difference between Q2120173 and Q7691226 isn't clear, maybe those two items should me merged as well. SJK (talk) 09:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- school of education (Q2120173) and school of pedagogy (Q7691226) have overlapping enwiki articles, they cannot simply be merged. But, in fact, they seem to be about the same topic. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- The purpose of every college is about educating students but it's not about teaching education. Not every college teaches it's students to be teachers. Merging with normal school (Q627006) (that's how one of the EnWiki articles describes one of the instances of this property) would make more sense then merging with college (Q189004). ChristianKl (talk) 10:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Have a look at Special:WhatLinksHere/Q29876627. It is used with colleges that teach education. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- If that's what it means, I would support merging with normal school (Q627006) (or school of pedagogy (Q7691226), although it seems too specific at a glance). Jc86035 (talk) 10:00, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Have a look at Special:WhatLinksHere/Q29876627. It is used with colleges that teach education. —MisterSynergy (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by Lymantria, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
José Vázquez Grela (Q12391191): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Title error Xas (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Merged with another item, Not deleted. —MisterSynergy (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Q24230761: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
En-wiki category was renamed in error then merged to Q24230902 Fayenatic london (talk) 21:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by Jared Preston (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)