Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2019/10/11

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q37109668

Q37109668: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused, seems to be a miscapitalized form of Q66305881 --- Jura 17:16, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

BTW, please don't merge the two spellings. --- Jura 16:24, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

The different spelling is only an error in the Wikidata labels and statements somehow derived from them, but the source probably combines Machin (Q66305881) with Machín (Q27429847). When the names were added it seems all "Mac..." names were assumed to be instances of surname prefixed with Mac or Mc (Q56219051), so we have labels such as "MacHuca" (Q37495441). Peter James (talk) 18:33, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Well, the label is the name. I copied the reference to the correct item. --- Jura 06:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 03:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q9026849

The song Maggie May's Français, Norsk and Svenska pages cannot be linked to the main page. I do not know how to fix this. Can anyone help ? JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 14:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Maggie May (Q9026849) is a disambiguation page; the song is Maggie May (Q1932553). I've linked the French and Norwegian pages to it; the Swedish one is still about the Beatles version so I've restored it to Maggie Mae (Q60732721). Peter James (talk) 15:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Not done per Peter James. Mahir256 (talk) 02:56, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q37495441

Q37495441: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

As per Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q37109668 above @Peter James: fyi --- Jura 06:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 03:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q61866606

Q61866606: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It looks like most, if not all, of the links in this item are for "MediaWiki:" pages. For this reason, does not meet Wikidata:Notability since it represents a page in the "MediaWiki:" namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 21:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

If deleted, please replace the item with interwiki links on all local pages. This was the main reason I created the item - to link the same code gadgets inbetween to make it easier to administrate. --Dvorapa (talk) 21:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 03:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q61870979

Q61870979: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It looks like most, if not all, of the links in this item are for "MediaWiki:" pages. For this reason, does not meet Wikidata:Notability since it represents a page in the "MediaWiki:" namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 21:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

If deleted, please replace the item with interwiki links on all local pages. This was the main reason I created the item - to link the same code gadgets inbetween to make it easier to administrate. --Dvorapa (talk) 21:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 03:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Adult film actresses by Signum-buzzta

Q51994212

Jerri Candace (Q51994212): Pornographic actress from El Salvador: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q51954919

Camilla Bored (Q51954919): Brazilian pornographic actress: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q51955072

Bree Maddox (Q51955072): Australian former pornographic actress and business woman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
I understand that for adult film actor it's unnecessary to be filmed much in order to be "immortalized" in Wikimedia projects (remember e.g. Bambi Woods), but if an adult model has been filmed literally ones (!), there should be a serious reason to create a Wikidata item about the person. We see no references or interwikis however... --Wolverène (talk) 09:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

General discussion

The author is inactive either here or in his home wiki de:, anyway I'm pinging to let him join the discussion.
I believe there's nothing wrong in creating items without interwikis, (sometimes I'm doing like this too) but in such a case a page should at least contain reference URL's. Signum-buzzta doesn't trouble himself with adding references, appropriate statements, identifiers (except basical iafd or pornhub, sometimes even without these). As a result, items contain minimal information, don't comply the notability policy, aren't updating for weeks or longer and getting vandalized without removal/elimination. Here's the list of pages created by the user, many of them have same problem. --Wolverène (talk) 09:10, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Looking at the last one above (Q52012981), it seems to have several identifiers. If you find them unsuitable for your children, maybe you could re-configure your filter. That items aren't "updated" in weeks or vandalized once in a while, isn't a reason for deletion .. we would end up deleting most content around here. --- Jura 19:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
- These identifies are standard/common, just profiles on porn sites, catalogues and social networking. My children... (sorry are you trying to troll me?) they don't care because I have no ones, and I've created many items about adult actors, compare any of my items and any of those. I repeating once again, if you don't understand right away: 1) Items have no reference URL's, ergo don't comply the notability criteria, 2) Items are looking too short for potentially unnotable models without references and interwikis. These are top problems for me. So pity if you support the creation of such 'quickies'.

"We would end up deleting most content around here" (c) - Among these? Most of potentially "deletable" are created by that author, trust me.. --Wolverène (talk) 20:02, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

I would see

Keep the items with identifiers (who act as reference by proxy, not ideal but enough for me) and

Delete the items without identifiers. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:48, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

It's OK if the nominated items will be kept but looking at the situation with e.g. the item about Bree Maddox I mentioned above, we can say that identifiers can be existed even for persons with obviously no notability from the position of any Wikipedia/Wikiquote/<...>. We may create millions of items about persons with pages in online catalogues, no matter how actually big their contribution to world art/science/politics etc, but then we should be ready to fact that these items will not have either the goal of interwiki centralization, or informational goal, or structural need, all that WD:N says.:) --Wolverène (talk) 08:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

@Wolverène: I understand and agree mostly but it seems to me you're mixing two very different things: use for Wikimedia project and use in general. This kind of items is obviously more for the second than the first. Interwiki centralization is clearly not a goal here but structural need is (these person played in films, have a family, employers, etc. and can fullfill a lot of structural needs, which can marginally also be useful for Wikipedias, for instance if someone not notable is the parent of someone notable, then it can be displayed in the infobox). PS: porn actor also sometimes have other life and may be notable for this other life (a well known example in France is John B. Root (Q3180965), a porn actor and film director but unexpectedly also a children's writer, whose books are widely read in French schools). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Yes everything is surely possible, in the end I'm still interested what a sysop will decide. --Wolverène (talk) 09:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done the first due to the Commons sitelink--although I hope someone could find other references about this person other than her photographer (@The Honorable: maybe you could help us out here?)--and the rest due to them being identified elsewhere. Mahir256 (talk) 03:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68342260

The massive stellar content in the starburst NGC 3049: a test for hot-star models (Q68342260): scientific article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spurious entry. @Ghuron: GZWDer (talk) 18:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Source has description; web search finds its title. Peter James (talk) 20:15, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep Perfectly legitimate scholarly article. - PKM (talk) 19:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:76.191.23.241, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q68289348

Q68289348: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spurious entry. GZWDer (talk) 18:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Probably. No title and unlikely page number in bibcode (1991ApJS...7522870A). Peter James (talk) 20:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Delete per nom --DannyS712 (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Items by User:Freebald

Q66809328: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q66809326: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q66809316: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q66809281: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No evidence of notability Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:47, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

There is relevant ongoing discussion at Wikidata:Project chat#Company items. —MisterSynergy (talk) 20:42, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Done by Ymblanter Mahir256 (talk) 04:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q66809379

Peninah Nakabo (Q66809379): Ugandan Female Chess Player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, no FIDE title. Steak (talk) 08:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done per the second criterion of WD:N. (I hope that AKibombo can add more references to it, though.) Mahir256 (talk) 04:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q56653802

Q56653802: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

José Rafael Cordero Sánchez, Venezuelan cross-wiki vandal. Venezolanito (talk) 02:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Still

Keep (but a bit less sure than the previous one), see Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2019/08/31#Q56653802 last week. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q64856309

Q64856309: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

SOmething went wrong with the bot, best to delete and have it recreated Magnus Manske (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

The identifiers are the same as James H. Broughton (Q67467916) with the name of James Kendrick (Q53510223). There is also Q64864540 possibly the same as Q67467916 but with a different Semantic Scholar ID and at least one error at semanticscholar.org (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10816-010-9095-7 where one of the authors is Jack M. Broughton, not J. H. Broughton). Peter James (talk) 13:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:20, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q60700696

General Prosecutor of the Republic (Q60700696): office responsible for the investigation and prosecution of federal crimes: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

ShouldAttorney General of Mexico (Q1507504) --Jesuiseduardo (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

That doesn't seem to be the same: Attorney General of Mexico (Q1507504) relates to Procuraduría General de la República (Q50150345) like General Prosecutor of the Republic (Q60700696) relates to Attorney General of Mexico (Q60678925). - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:40, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Not done per Cycn. Mahir256 (talk) 04:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q9875875

Category:Cutaneous conditions (Q9875875): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

They need to be merged. — T. 17:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@Wikitanvir: "they" মানে কি? এটা কোন আইটেমের সাথে একত্রীকরণ করতে হবে? Mahir256 (talk) 17:51, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@Mahir256: ঠিক তাও না। আসলে Q9875875-এর থাকার-ই প্রয়োজন নেই। কারণ bn:বিষয়শ্রেণী:চর্মরোগ আসলে যুক্ত হবে en:Category:Cutaneous conditions-এর সাথে। — T. 17:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Mahir256, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@Mahir256: অনেক ধন্যবাদ। আসলে কিছু আইটেম হালনাগাদ ছাড়া উইকিউপাত্তে সেভাবে কাজ করা হয়না আমার তাই সেভাবে আপনাকে বোঝাতেও পারিনি। "they"-এর মাধ্যমে আমি Q9875875 ও Q7215485 বুঝিয়েছিলাম, কিন্তু উল্লেখ করেছিলাম শুধু একটি আইটেম নম্বর। যাইহোক সবকিছু ঠিক করে দেওয়ার জন্য অসংখ্য ধন্যবাদ। — T. 18:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Q17966032

Dante de Blasio (Q17966032): the son of mayor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unnotable child, no structural need --- Jura 13:05, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Keep This item is a structural need by itself, since it is used in Bill de Blasio (Q4911497) and it's used in the Infobox Wikidata in Commons to display spouse and children of Bill de Blasio. --Deansfa (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

It's automatically displayed there. Commons has no structural need for it and it appears you got mislead by its present => Delete. "number of children" would be more informative. --- Jura 15:19, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Keep it clearly has structural need, VIGNERON (talk) 15:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Actually, we have "number of children" for this. No, don't make items for every child every politician. --- Jura 15:15, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

@Jura1: I have added some statements. Are they enough?--GZWDer (talk) 18:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

@GZWDer: Which one do you think would make it notable? I don't think geni does. Everybody has that. --- Jura 18:53, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

@Jura1: What about two sources I cited in item?--GZWDer (talk) 19:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done @GZWDer: good point: withdrawing. --- Jura 18:12, 11 October 2019 (UTC)