Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Hazard-SJ 2
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Done by Quentinv57, expires 2013-04-08. IW 17:37, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hazard-SJ edit
Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 8 January 2013 00:51 (UTC)
- Hazard-SJ (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hello, and happy new year! I'm currently an autopatrolled user here, and I'd like to be made an administrator. I've been editing here since the day after our launch, and am fairly active in my opinion. I currently operate a bot, which archives discussions, including the requests for deletions page. I am a member of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team (SWMT), like many other users here, and am also global rollbacker. I have local rights such as rollbacker on some wikis, such as the English and Simple English Wikipedias, as well as the Simple English Wiktionary, editor on MediaWiki, and autopatrolled on Meta, and a few others. I'd love to be able to assist with deletions and editing the interface where necessary. In addition, I would also like to aid with the promotion of other users to the autopatrolled group, as well as other administrator tasks. Thank you. -- Hazard-SJ ✈ 00:51, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Votes edit
- Support Adminship is no big deal and I think it would be helpful for him. Vogone (talk) 02:56, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support trusted user--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Trusted user globally, but his contribs here are excellent. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support My first "I thought he was one already" support vote. Has the project really been going that long? Just a note - there's a conversation about whether or not the people getting the mop now should be given full or temporary adminship. I'd like for the candidate to comment on which one he thinks is best for his specific case please. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:01, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure it is entirely my choice, more of the community's, but I'd like "indefinite" adminship, as I'd rather call it. We have already gone two full months, and our community should be able to have such considerations by now, considering the size. In fact, I think it would be good to ask current temporary admistrators to get our confirmation for indefinite adminship as well. Some of them have been doing well so far. Thanks for your consideration. Hazard-SJ ✈ 05:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, trusted and experienced. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 17:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support temporary adminship. Ajraddatz (Talk) 17:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Stevenliuyi (talk) 18:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Sk!d (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Rzuwig► 11:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Eric-92 (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Rschen7754 00:37, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Techman224Talk 01:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Stryn (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Hopefully this time it can be successful here. -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 16:47, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Very active and interested user. Conny (talk) 19:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]
- Support — Arkanosis ✉ 11:00, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support IW 17:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 18:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support πr2 (t • c) 02:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Iste (D) 15:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments edit
- ...