Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Hazard-Bot 4
(Redirected from Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Hazard-Bot 4)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Yeah, this definitely has consensus for approval. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hazard-Bot 4 edit
- Operator: Hazard-SJ
- Task: Removing sitelinks of deleted pages
- The bot checks through the deletion logs of Wikipedias of all languages supported here on Wikidata, except the locked ones.
- If the pages received from the log exist, they are skipped.
- If no Wikidata item exist on the entity, the page is skipped.
- If, however, the bot finds an item, it removes the sitelink for that language.
- The final check would be to verify that the sitelink removed wasn't the only sitelink on the item. If, however, it was, it would add the page to RFD. — Hazard-SJ ✈ 02:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The bot is currently running through the trial. — Hazard-SJ ✈ 02:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I don't see any reason why not to support. --Stryn (talk) 07:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Very useful --ValterVB (talk) 12:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support would relieve me :) IW 13:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support This task definitely makes sense. --Iste (D) 15:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks good. --β16 - (talk) 17:35, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Sensible to automate this. In time, we may want to automate the deletion as well. James F. (talk) 18:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Rzuwig► 20:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Very useful --Thieol (talk) 12:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Question I think that is not possible, but you can check that the deleted article wasn't a redirect? In this case I think we have to update the wikidata item with the target of the redirect, instead simple delete the link from the item. --β16 - (talk) 11:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer No, that wouldn't be possible. The bot would need access to view deleted data on all wikis for that to happen. — Hazard-SJ ✈ 20:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok. Maybe another bot which reads the move logs can be useful. --β16 - (talk) 10:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- My bot (Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Legobot) does that. Legoktm (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, great :) --β16 - (talk) 13:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- My bot (Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Legobot) does that. Legoktm (talk) 13:00, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok. Maybe another bot which reads the move logs can be useful. --β16 - (talk) 10:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer No, that wouldn't be possible. The bot would need access to view deleted data on all wikis for that to happen. — Hazard-SJ ✈ 20:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Would it be too much trouble for the bot to save up its deletion requests and then use the bulk request template every {hour/few hours/whatever makes sense based on edit rates}? It seems like that would, at the very least, save some space on that page, especially since the bot is always going to be using the same deletion rationale. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer As I just said on IRC, I'd prefer wait until I know the bot can work without having to exit because of errors first. When I'm satisfied that this is the case, I could let the bot submit in groups of 15 (that's the maximum supported for the bulk request template at the moment, IIRC), then at the end of the run, submit any remaining requests. — Hazard-SJ ✈ 06:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done I've just updated the code to post every time it has a list of 90 items to be deleted using the rfd group template. It should then make a final post when the execution is complete, considering there are more items to be deleted. It it is only one item, it should use the format it used prior to this update. I'll see how this works out the next time the bot runs, as I haven't confirmed it to work as yet. — Hazard-SJ ✈ 03:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer As I just said on IRC, I'd prefer wait until I know the bot can work without having to exit because of errors first. When I'm satisfied that this is the case, I could let the bot submit in groups of 15 (that's the maximum supported for the bulk request template at the moment, IIRC), then at the end of the run, submit any remaining requests. — Hazard-SJ ✈ 06:31, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thanks for making it use the bulk template. Legoktm (talk) 06:02, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks fine so far. Glad to see there's finally a bot doing this task (after I found some 225 deletion candidates just by going through the frwiki and nlwiki deletion logs), and glad to see my template's going to good use. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 10:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 19:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 09:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]