Wikidata

Wikidata:Property proposal/has vector

< Wikidata:Property proposal

has biological vector edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science

DescriptionThe biological group (often a taxon) which works as a vector for this pathogenic biological group . See Wilson et al 2017 (PMC5352812) for different valid perspectives on the concept of vector.
Representsvector (Q107994)
Data typeItem
Example 1Zika virus (Q202864) → Aedes aegypti (Q1148004)
Example 2yellow fever virus (Q836749) → Aedes aegypti (Q1148004)
Example 3Dengue virus (Q476209) → Aedes aegypti (Q1148004)
Example 4Plasmodium (Q130948) → Anopheles (Q158597)
Planned useConnect manually pathogens and their vectors. Create structure for future integration with databases (e.g. VEuPathDB: the eukaryotic pathogen, vector and host bioinformatics resource center (Q112066091)
See alsohost (P2975), disease transmission process (P1060), natural reservoir of (P1606), has natural reservoir (P1605)

Motivation edit

While similar properties are available, there is no clear way to represent pathogen-vector relations on Wikidata.

The pathogen-vector relation is important for understanding all types of diseases, property would make the process of documenting the relation quite straightforward.

Although there are multiple definitions of a vector (see What is a vector? (Q30252972) for multiple perspectives), there is some degree of consensus and the concept is widely used. 

TiagoLubiana (talk) 18:28, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

TiagoLubiana 01:35, 16 March 2020 Daniel Mietchen 01:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jodi.a.schneider 02:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Chchowmein 02:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dhx1 03:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Konrad Foerstner 06:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Netha Hussain 06:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bodhisattwa 06:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neo-Jay 07:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
John Samuel 07:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
KlaudiuMihaila 07:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Salgo60 09:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Andrawaag 10:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Whidou 10:16, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blue Rasberry 15:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
TJMSmith 16:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Egon Willighagen 16:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nehaoua 20:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Andy Mabbett (UTC)
Peter Murray-Rust 00:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kasyap 02:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Denny 16:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kwj2772 16:56, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Joalpe 22:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Finn Årup Nielsen fnielsen) 10:59, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Skim 11:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SCIdude 15:15, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Evolution and evolvability 01:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) 07:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mlemusrojas 15:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yupik 20:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Csisc 23:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OAnick 10:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gnoeee 12:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jjkoehorst 14:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So9q 08:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nandana 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Addshore 15:56, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Librarian lena 18:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jelabra 19:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AlexanderPico 23:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Higa4 02:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
JoranL 19:56, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alejgh 11:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Will (Wiki Ed)) 17:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ranjithsiji 04:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
AntoineLogean 07:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hannolans 17:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Farmbrough 21:15, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ecritures 21:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Notified participants of WikiProject COVID-19 - TiagoLubiana (talk) 18:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrawaag (talk) 13:57, 25 May 2017 (UTC) DarTar (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC) Jodi.a.schneider Daniel Mietchen (talk) 15:04, 25 May 2017 (UTC) Mikima (talk) 08:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Notified participants of WikiProject Zika Corpus - TiagoLubiana (talk) 18:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Notified participants of WikiProject Microbiology - TiagoLubiana (talk) 18:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support if this does not exist I thought I saw this proposed or created since COVID, but I might be misremembering. It obviously needs to exist. The current description says that a vector needs to be a taxon, but I provided an example otherwise with the necktie example. Objects can be a vector for disease transmission also. Bluerasberry (talk) 17:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. If a necktie can be considered a vector or not depends on the definition, but I agree that it is the case under some definitions. I guess the description should be taken with a grain of salt in this case, but feel free to word it better. TiagoLubiana (talk) 21:12, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Great, seems cool, proceed Bluerasberry (talk) 18:52, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-   Support --Andrawaag (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-   Support and I wouldn't encourage using specific things like necktie as object in the example. The general term for objects as vector is fomite (Q3075150). --SCIdude (talk)


@TiagoLubiana, Bluerasberry, SCIdude, ChristianKl:   Done as has biological vector (P11231) but I kept the narrow (taxonomic) definition of a vector according to the voices in the discussion. Please don't use for neckties etc.Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 18:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Property_proposal/has_vector&oldid=1781698064"