Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2017/10/21

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q19765039: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item --Livenws (talk) 22:48, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
  Deleted by HakanIST (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Carnivorans (Q9768263): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant B. Jankuloski (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done Redirect created by HakanIST, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Q1275238: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

De-Article was deleted. --Dandelo (talk) 10:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

  Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Q31178831: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty data; the article was deleted. --Ohtani tanya (talk) 10:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

  Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Winning Jah (Q28112194): Nigerian reggae musician (born 1973): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion with frequent destruction, are the identifiers enough to indicate notability? Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 18:38, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Leaning   Keep. Allmusic + IMDB + VIAF seems enough for me to say this item is acceptable. (Notability criterion #2 - uniquely identifiable human being with publicly available reference to IMDB + Allmusic) Deryck Chan (talk) 15:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
  Keep - enough identifiers to rise to a minimum level of notability. -- Fuzheado (talk) 22:55, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Q28020842: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not-notable talk page. Steak (talk) 09:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
@Steak: are you trying to nominate Talk:Q83093/List of mushrooms or Q28020842 for deletion? (similar for above and below) Deryck Chan (talk) 16:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Well, maybe this talk page should be deleted, but I am nominating here the item, I don't really care about the talk page. Steak (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
@Steak: it's an item for a list, not a talk page. Nothing on the item should indicate the contrary.
--- Jura 08:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Place this list as a subpage of a WikiProject or whatever. Talk pages are not notable. Steak (talk) 16:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
Indeed, it's the talk page of an item, with a listeria list of the same item in the talk page. Very classic, but why create an item to refer to the list, especially since the list is dynamic, and not exhaustive ? this looks like self-referencing... --Hsarrazin (talk) 12:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Delete the item as self-referential and not meeting inclusion criteria. But   Move the list itself to Wikidata namespace. Deryck Chan (talk) 15:14, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
    • It seems you are contradicting what you wrote in the following section. I don't think there is an inclusion criteria the prevents us from having sitelinks to Wikidata. Where do you find this?
      --- Jura 15:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
      • @Jura1: Interesting thought. According to WD:N #1, Talk namespace sitelinks do not confer notability. But yes if the list gets moved to Wikidata namespace, then we can justify a Wikidata item. The difference between this item (list of mushrooms) and the one below is that the item below (list of trees in Spain) is linked from many other items about lists of trees in various areas of Spain, so it satisfies WD:N #3 in a way that the mushrooms item doesn't. Deryck Chan (talk) 07:50, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  •   Delete - No Wikipedia editions seem to be maintaining a list of mushrooms, and long term, these will be automatically generated. -- Fuzheado (talk) 22:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

  Done --Pasleim (talk) 17:06, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia meetups in Rajshahi (Q8925913): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Category of a local event by wikipedians --Nahid Hossain (talk) 17:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

  •   Keep. @Nahid.rajbd: A Wikimedia category that exists on two sites (en.wp and Commons) about a set of Wikimedia local events is a clear entity that is permitted as a Wikidata item per WD:N#1. In fact I would propose splitting this into two items: one item for "Wikimedia events in Rajshahi" and one item for "Category:Wikipedia meetups in Rajshahi". Deryck Chan (talk) 14:10, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Category:University of Rajshahi (Q8632541): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Auto generated from more than one category --Nahid Hossain (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

  Keep - seems to be a completly valid category item. - cycŋ - (talkcontribslogs) 09:15, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Makkah Millennium Hotel (Q28456180): hotel in Mecca, Saudi Arabia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The hotel ceased to operate under the Hilton brand, kindly assist in the deletion of the item. Thank you. --Veliko Kostadinov (talk) 09:12, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

@Veliko Kostadinov: You can just add new statements to the item with the new information (maybe "Makkah Millennium Hotel" as official name). Please add it with preferred rank.
--- Jura 09:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
@Veliko Kostadinov:A change in name is no reason to delete the item. It's rather a time to rename the item and put down the information of when the the change in name happened. ChristianKl (talk) 12:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 17:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Rjwilmsi (Q23043157): Wikimedian and developer of AutoWikiBrowser: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't match criterias. --Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  Comment I don't know if it should deleted! It's same like this and this! --Alaa :)..! 17:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
Why not? To what extent it is useful or notable enough? Nomen ad hoc (talk) 21:16, 18 October 2017 (UTC).
ok, those 3 are the developpers of AutoWikiBrowser (Q4063270), which makes them a structural need for documenting AutoWikiBrowser (Q4063270). --Hsarrazin (talk) 09:28, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Right! It should be precised on their alias description, IMHO. Please, close this request. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 14:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC).

  Not done --Pasleim (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Q41279813: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty David (talk) 16:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

  Deleted by Pasleim (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)