Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/09/01

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Sidorkov (Q113639468): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Q107977831 double --Skepsiz (talk) 01:08, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Done Redirect created by User:JustAnotherArchivist, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113667543: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vandalism Madamebiblio (talk) 02:31, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 03:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q25410856: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item Sakretsu (talk) 14:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Ameisenigel (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113629251: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Out on Wikidata:Notability Leonaardog (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Ameisenigel (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113655959: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable Jamie7687 (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113657448: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam. Account is blocked for spam on Commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113657368: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113660776: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 18:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

  1. Q113082620 (delete | history | links | logs)
  2. Q113662758 (delete | history | links | logs)
  3. Q109908900 (delete | history | links | logs)
  4. Q113659075 (delete | history | links | logs)
  5. Q113661157 (delete | history | links | logs)
  6. Q113657448 (delete | history | links | logs)
  7. Q113657368 (delete | history | links | logs)
  8. Q113643556 (delete | history | links | logs)
  9. Q113652507 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Non notable Trade (talk) 19:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

@Lymantria: --Trade (talk) 19:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs)   Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) 05:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q107602382: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability discernible. Gymnicus (talk) 09:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:10, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
@Gymnicus: entry in many movie databases. I am not sure about deleting--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
@Estopedist1: All the entries in the film databases are purely user-created content. There is no evidence that meets the second point of Wikidata's notability criteria. In addition, you only have to look at the fact that the film was published on Youtube. --Gymnicus (talk) 13:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
  Deleted by Estopedist1 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q30921128: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 01:09, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
  Delete, said that a disambiguation page, but via genre (P136) connected to four items. It doesn't make sense that "genre" is a disambiguation page Estopedist1 (talk) 17:46, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
  Deleted by Estopedist1 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113509968: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, no source, may vioale WD:LP Fralambert (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
  Delete no serious source given. The burden of proof lies on the creator (unfortunately anonym), active contributor is user:IrakozeM Estopedist1 (talk) 17:50, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
  Deleted by Estopedist1 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113509979: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No nobable, no source Fralambert (talk) 04:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
  Delete per nom. Related RFD: Q113509968 Estopedist1 (talk) 04:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
  Deleted by Estopedist1 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Autobahn / Morgenspaziergang (Q64713177): 1974 single by Kraftwerk: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake; orphan Luca Dell'Orto (talk) 13:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
  Oppose This is not an item created "by mistake". It's the item for the single, which is different from the item for the composition. Moebeus (talk) 13:32, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
All the Wikipedia articles linked to the item talk about the single. Luca Dell'Orto (talk) 13:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
I said created by mistake because I didn't know that there was the other item, really useful for interwiki Luca Dell'Orto (talk) 13:54, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
@Luca Dell'Orto@Moebeus am I right that the question is, do we need standalone items for a single and a song? Similar cases in Wikidata? Estopedist1 (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Heh, of course we do. Songs, tracks, and singles are conceptually different things, with different sets of properties and external identifiers. Wikipedia often groups them, on Wikidata we work very hard to keep them separate. A good place to begin learning about the music model is Wikidata:WikiProject Music. Moebeus (talk) 10:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
  Not deleted Estopedist1 (talk) 11:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113510191: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no Wikimedia Commons gallery in the category topic data item, so the single Wikimedia Commons link can be moved to the category topic data item and this data item can be deleted. Gymnicus (talk) 15:03, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Where to join n:pl:Kategoria:Katastrofa ekologiczna na Odrze? Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 17:39, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
@Marek Mazurkiewicz: This page link was in the right place at the time the deletion request was made. This page link belongs in the data object 2022 Oder environmental disaster (Q113505163). @Matlin: Why did you undo the edit of Patryk2710? She was absolutely right. --Gymnicus (talk) 21:29, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Nope. Page is page, category is category. Matlin (talk) 20:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
I also believe that "Page is page, category is category" Example: Q69306525 and Q113330385 Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 21:24, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
@Marek Mazurkiewicz: Nice example, but not applicable here. To my astonishment, the example in the Czech-language Wikinews has both a category for the date and a page for the date, so this separation is correct from my point of view. On the other hand, the separation of 2022 Oder environmental disaster (Q113505163) and Q113510191 makes no sense. In addition, this separation also contradicts the current handling of Wikinews categories. Because Wikinews categories are equated with normal Wikinews pages. See for example Dresden (Q1731) and Category:Dresden (Q4579870). There the Wikinews categories are contained in the normal data object and not in the category data object. --Gymnicus (talk) 07:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
River cataclysm is not a city, so "nice example, but not applicable here". 😂😂😂 Matlin (talk) 08:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
@Matlin: Okay, another example for you then: 2021 European floods (Q107529288) – There isn't even a category data object here because, just like 2022 Oder environmental disaster (Q113505163), it's not necessary. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:12, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Wikidata is primarily a database on the real world and not metadata storage for Wikimedia (this appears to be secondary aim). Therefore, looking from the perspective of Wikimedian page vs category may not be aligned with the aim to describe the world. There is an element for, for example, Earth (Q2). And then if you (or a computer, since Wikidata is machine-readable) ask: „Where can I find more information on Earth in Wikipedia?” it's obviously the article w:Earth (or any language version). When talking about Wikinews, there's rarely a sole page on the subject and Wikidata permits for only one sitelink in a given [language, project] pair. The only possibility to link the wiki-based entities to the abstract concept Q2 is via the Wikinews category (i.e. n:Category:Earth). And in fact an answer to the question „Where can I find more information on Earth in Wikinews?” is: navigate to the category.
Additionally, assuming that WN categories should be linked to their own Wikidata items, wouldn't they form a set completely distinct from items that are sitelinked to other sister projects? This would be against linking the knowledge. Msz2001 (talk) 15:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
@Gymnicus@Marek Mazurkiewicz@Matlin@Msz2001 solution is easy. Until we haven't standalone article in plwiki or gallery in Commons, there is no point to keep two items. Hence Q113510191 and Q113505163 to be merged Estopedist1 (talk) 05:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
I can live with that suggestion. The data object Q113510191 does not necessarily have to be deleted, even if I wrote it that way in the deletion request. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Just in case, I mention, that I merged the content, not items (category item vs topical item), category item is redundant per discussion--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
  Deleted by Estopedist1 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q85975573: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Kadı Message 12:47, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

  Delete per nom. Just in case pinging major contributor user:Evrifaessa Estopedist1 (talk) 08:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
  Deleted by Estopedist1 (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113642364: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

invalid ID (L700306): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wrong creation Yiyi .... (talk!) 09:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Ameisenigel (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113667959: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113018494: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable and self-promotional of a person trying to offer "SEO" services Jamie7687 (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113664713: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113664437: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails notability Rockpeterson (talk) 14:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113671532: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vanity spam Praxidicae (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113671516: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vanity spam and duplicate Praxidicae (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113673921: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vanity spam Praxidicae (talk) 14:56, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Bovlb (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Pratik Salunke (Q61896455): Indian cricketer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability --191.191.77.89 15:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
if the ORCID iD (P496) belongs to this person, then seems to be   Keep Estopedist1 (talk) 08:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
  Not deleted Estopedist1 (talk) 18:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113495679: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not shown to be notable; repeatedly deleted and recreated by a lock-evading spammer. See m:User:Tol/D/YZ for documentation. JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 01:07, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Lymantria (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113542848: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Vanity spam Praxidicae (talk) 03:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

  On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
  Not done per WD:N #3 as spouse of Q113561641 --Emu (talk) 22:02, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q111586384: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't appear to be notable, self promo --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Ymblanter (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Q113613412: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Deleted by Ymblanter (talkcontribslogs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Arch User Repository (Q85864520): secondary package repository for Arch Linux: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This incomplete page is useless, and its purpose has already be fulfilled by the item id Q17521339. It is causing a conflict with the Google Knowledge Graph ID --Matr4x-404 (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  Not deleted Merged. Bovlb (talk) 21:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)