Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Legoktm
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Yeah, so technically this has a few more hours to run, but there's no chance of it not passing so I went ahead and let the stewards know. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Granted by Matanya. --Stryn (talk) 12:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, so technically this has a few more hours to run, but there's no chance of it not passing so I went ahead and let the stewards know. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:46, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Legoktm edit
Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 17 February 2013 11:16 (UTC)
- Legoktm (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hi, I've been working cleaning up a bunch of duplicate items (you can see User:Legobot/Dupes and it's history), and while I don't mind having other admins do it for me, I would like to also be able to do it myself :P. I can also help by deleting things at WD:RFD as well, answer help requests on IRC, and assist with editing abusefilter rules. Thanks! Legoktm (talk) 11:16, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Votes edit
- Support candidate is clueful and has good crosswiki experience, and this would be helpful as a bot operator needing to delete items. --Rschen7754 11:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Excellent admin candidate, no doubts here. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 11:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Only 150 edits so far. --Sk!d (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Indeed, the candidate only has 150 edits, but the bot has over a 1000, otherwise no concerns.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Adminship should be easy to get, and as a bot operator he could use it. I can also help clear out some of those duplicates :D Ajraddatz (Talk) 15:20, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support yes. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 22:23, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak support - low edit count but trustworthy.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support When it comes to trustworthy users like Legoktm who have put so much time and knowledge into their bots, edit count shouldn't matter. To me, every single edit Legobot has made so far is far more important than even 5000 edits that Legoktm could have probably made in the time he has spent writing and maintaining his bot. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Stryn (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Wiki13 talk 12:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support IW 12:51, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - great user who works very hard for us already. James F. (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Just bring up the edit count. :) Regards, — Moe Epsilon 00:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, sure - Hoo man (talk) 01:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Iste (D) 17:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support of course, per Riley Vogone (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Rzuwig► 21:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — Arkanosis ✉ 22:20, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support —-Shanmugamp7 (talk) 03:17, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious support per en:User:Legoktm/IALR. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 06:26, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Techman224Talk 19:36, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious Support is obvious. Duh. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 03:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments edit
- ...