Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, Cruzate1492!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

Please merge instead of blanking edit

  Thank you for your work in maintaining Wikidata. I have a small suggestion to improve your future work. If you notice that two items are duplicates, please merge them instead of blanking one of them as you did with the page Q97707762. External sites use Wikidata identifiers, so it is important that we preserve the chain of references. We do this by making one item a redirect for the other. In particular, item ids are intended to be a permanent identifier, so we never reuse them for another concept. See Help:Merge for more information on how to merge items, and consider installing the Merge Gadget. Thanks! --Horcrux (talk) 08:26, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[Traducido automáticamente]
Gracias por su trabajo en el mantenimiento de Wikidata. Tengo una pequeña sugerencia para mejorar tu trabajo futuro. Si observa que dos elementos son duplicados, combínelos en lugar de dejar uno en blanco como lo hizo con la página Q97707762. Los sitios externos usan identificadores de Wikidata, por lo que es importante que conservemos la cadena de referencias. Hacemos esto al hacer que un elemento sea una redirección para el otro. En particular, los identificadores de elementos están destinados a ser un identificador permanente, por lo que nunca los reutilizamos para otro concepto. Consulte Help:Merge/es para obtener más información sobre cómo fusionar elementos, y considere instalar el gadget de fusión. ¡Gracias! --Horcrux (talk) 08:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
El procedimiento está indicado en la página Help:Merge/es. --Horcrux (talk) 10:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Q19597898 edit

Your change here to Q19597898 broke the links at Commons. The English name should be staying the same since Вячеслав is not in English. Can you please change that back and move Вячеслав to the proper language? Thanks! -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Club deportivo edit

Buenas Cruzate1492. He visto tus ediciones sobre hockey patín, gracias por ellas, pero creo que no debería ponerse en "instancia de" como esta. Creo que deberían ser deshechas porque en realidad esos son clubes deportivos, que están indicados así, y en caso de querer obtener los deportes que están disputando, deberíamos hacer una consulta preguntando por clubes que tengan en deporte el hockey patín y te saldrán muchos. ¿Qué te parece? Un saludo. --Vanbasten 23 (talk) 16:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perfecto. ¿Puedes deshacer tus ediciones? Gracias y un saludo. --Vanbasten 23 (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Felix and Filu or Felicius edit

Hallo Cruzate1492!

Why is Felix and Filu or Felicius equal? Do you have a source for that? Greetings, --HarryNº2 (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Q5752240 edit

Hola, Cruzate1492, Me encontré ayer con este item Carlos de Úbeda y Danmartín (Q5752240) en el que hiciste unos cambios hace unas semanas que no logro entender. No cuadra con el contenido del artículo en Wikipedia. ¿Existe alguna referencia que diga que el infante Carlos de Úbeda y Luigi di Castiglia (Q3840289) son la misma persona? Un saludo. -sasha- (talk) 12:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[WMF Board of Trustees - Call for feedback: Community Board seats] Meetings with the Wikidata community edit

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is organizing a call for feedback about community selection processes between February 1 and March 14. While the Wikimedia Foundation and the movement have grown about five times in the past ten years, the Board’s structure and processes have remained basically the same. As the Board is designed today, we have a problem of capacity, performance, and lack of representation of the movement’s diversity. Our current processes to select individual volunteer and affiliate seats have some limitations. Direct elections tend to favor candidates from the leading language communities, regardless of how relevant their skills and experience might be in serving as a Board member, or contributing to the ability of the Board to perform its specific responsibilities. It is also a fact that the current processes have favored volunteers from North America and Western Europe. In the upcoming months, we need to renew three community seats and appoint three more community members in the new seats. This call for feedback is to see what processes can we all collaboratively design to promote and choose candidates that represent our movement and are prepared with the experience, skills, and insight to perform as trustees?

In this regard, two rounds of feedback meetings are being hosted to collect feedback from the Wikidata community. Two rounds are being hosted with the same agenda, to accomodate people from various time zones across the globe. We will be discussing ideas proposed by the Board and the community to address the above mentioned problems. Please sign-up according to whatever is most comfortable to you. You are welcome to participate in both as well!

Also, please share this with other volunteers who might be interested in this. Let me know if you have any questions. KCVelaga (WMF), 14:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Call for participation in the interview study with Wikidata editors edit

Dear Cruzate1492,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King’s College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research that develops a personalized recommendation system to suggest Wikidata items for the editors based on their interests and preferences. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I would love to talk with you to know about your current ways to choose the items you work on in Wikidata and understand the factors that might influence such a decision. Your cooperation will give us valuable insights into building a recommender system that can help improve your editing experience.

Participation is completely voluntary. You have the option to withdraw at any time. Your data will be processed under the terms of UK data protection law (including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018). The information and data that you provide will remain confidential; it will only be stored on the password-protected computer of the researchers. We will use the results anonymized to provide insights into the practices of the editors in item selection processes for editing and publish the results of the study to a research venue. If you decide to take part, we will ask you to sign a consent form, and you will be given a copy of this consent form to keep.

If you’re interested in participating and have 15-20 minutes to chat (I promise to keep the time!), please either contact me at kholoudsaa@gmail.com or kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdmmFHaiB20nK14wrQJgfrA18PtmdagyeRib3xGtvzkdn3Lgw/viewform?usp=sf_link with your choice of the times that work for you.

I’ll follow up with you to figure out what method is the best way for us to connect.

Please contact me if you have any questions or require more information about this project.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.


Kholoudsaa (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

1 wrong character in your edit edit

Hi Cruzate1492, could you please change the word "kleriker des Opus Dei" into "Kleriker des Opus Dei", resulting from your edit. WikiData doesn't let me change that 1 letter from k to K. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Descripciones edit

Buenas Cruzate, un placer volver a saludarte, espero que estés muy bien. Te escribo porque me he encontrado alguno de tus cambios, concretamente en descripciones, y en general son muy largas, tienen que ser más concisas, sin entrar en detalles y en español comienzan en minúscula. Un saludo. --Vanbasten 23 (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Roman Catholic priest (Q104050302) edit

Hola Cruzate. Te escribo en español, ya que es tu idioma nativo. Tengo unas cuantas dudas sobre este elemento que me hacen pensar que pueda generar más confusión que otra cosa.

Para empezar, el título resulta ambiguo. Roman Catholic es una expresión que se utiliza para designar a toda la Iglesia católica, tanto occidental como oriental. Puedes ver aquí que el mismo papa Juan Pablo II se refirió a sí mismo como the Head of the Roman Catholic Church. No es por tanto un término exclusivo que designe a la Iglesia latina o a la parte de la Iglesia que emplea el rito romano. Sin embargo, aquí empleas el título Roman Catholic priest para referirte a un sacerdote no únicamente católico, sino católico perteneciente a la Iglesia latina (con rito romano). Es evidente que no concuerdan ambas cosas a la vez.

Pero además, a nivel de cómo la Iglesia católica entiende los sacramentos, puede llevar a confusión. El orden sacerdotal, como sacramento que es, es el mismo para toda la Iglesia, independientemente del rito. Del mismo modo en que no se diferencia a nivel sacramental la Eucaristía cuando es celebrada en el rito romano de cuando es celebrada en el rito bizantino (es decir, la diferencia está en el rito en el que se expresa, pero no en el sacramento en sí), tampoco hay diferencia alguna a nivel del sacerdocio. No hay por tanto distintos sacerdotes dentro de la Iglesia católica. En todo caso, hay sacerdotes católicos que pertenecen a una Iglesia sui iuris concreta, que emplea un rito concreto, pero nada más. Existen incluso casos de birritualidad, esto es, sacerdotes que reciben la concesión para celebrar en varios ritos, por lo que no tiene sentido esta clasificación que se ha hecho aquí.

Creo por tanto que lo mejor es que este elemento se fusione con Q250867. Podría también renombrarse a algo como "Sacerdote católico de rito romano", pero esta última opción, si bien es la menos mala, tampoco es exacta porque dentro de la Iglesia latina se celebra también en otros ritos como el ambrosiano, mozárabe, etc. Un saludo. --Grabado (talk) 08:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Cruzate1492: ¿? --Grabado (talk) 07:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Por favor, no modifique el sentido de un elemento (me refiero a Q250867, pero aplica para todos los casos). Si lo considera necesario, puede crear un elemento nuevo. Andreasm háblame / just talk to me

master builder (Q1340643) to Template:Q98714302 edit

Could you please explain why you merged master builder (Q1340643) to Template:Q98714302. I doubt they are the same and even if, it’s against policy to merge to the highter Q number. But then again I might be missing something. --Emu (talk) 07:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vox edit

Hola, creo que entiendes el idioma español, ¿no? Por favor, no entres en una guerra de ediciones injustificada en la entrada dedicada a Vox, pues de lo contrario me vería obligado a reportarte a los administradores. Hay una página de discusión donde puedes debatir tus cambios. Las tres referencias hablan claramente de Vox como situado en la extrema derecha ("far-right") del espectro político. También podrías dialogar algo, o explicar tus ediciones en los resúmenes de edición. Espero que consideres seriamente este aviso antes de continuar con ediciones unilaterales e injustificadas. Saludos. PedroAcero76 (talk) 14:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Lo que diga un medio ¿es siempre cierto? Acaso el Grupo de los Conservadores y Reformistas Europeos es de extrema derecha Cruzate1492 (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Respondo en la página de discusión de la entrada. PedroAcero76 (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sánchez-Guerra vs Sánchez Guerra edit

Hello Cruzate1492!

Sánchez-Guerra (Q109807527) is a hyphenated surname (Q106319018); Sánchez Guerra is a double family name (Q29042997). A separate data record must be created for both family names. Greetings --HarryNº2 (talk) 10:57, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

son el mismo apellido, pero en español existen amabas grafías Cruzate1492 (talk) 11:07, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It doesn't matter, but a separate data record must be created for each spelling. HarryNº2 (talk) 11:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment edit

Dear Cruzate1492,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender system that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our system based on your previous edits. Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study will start in late January 2022 or early February 2022, and it should take no more than 30 minutes.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about the study, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.


Kholoudsaa (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please, do not edit war edit

On communism (Q6186) I reverted your contribution explaining how it was not correct. You reverted my revert without providing any reference or justification. Please don't do that. Thank you. CaLéValab (talk) 17:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mejor en espanol ;) edit

Hola @Cruzate1492:, lo siento, no vi que no entiende ingles. A proposito de su contribucion que anulé en Catholic hymn (Q4138449) : algunas entidades estaban mal llamadas en espanol, eso es porque se equivocó.

Lo siento por mi espanol rudimentario. CaLéValab (talk) 00:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

P1001 on Apostolic Nunciatures edit


Lo siento, no hablo español.

I saw that you were working on Apostolic Nunciatures in the past days. It's a good thing as it is very messy and there is often a confusion between the diplomatic mission, the Apostolic Nunciature, and the diplomat, the apostolic nuncio who is the ambassador of the Holy See to the country.

But I'm very concerned about you changing the applies to jurisdiction (P1001) of these missions to Holy See (Q159583). It is an error as, for any diplomatic mission, applies to jurisdiction (P1001) is the country, or the countries, where it has power over. For example, the correct value for applies to jurisdiction (P1001) of Apostolic Nunciature to Paraguay (Q3667976) is Paraguay (Q733), in the same way the correct value for applies to jurisdiction (P1001) of embassy of Bolivia in Paraguay (Q110527379) is Paraguay (Q733). I think that you wanted to modify the value of operator (P137) as it is often indicated Vatican City (Q237), the sovereign state (Q3624078), but the correct value should be Holy See (Q159583) which is a subject of international law (Q1896989) ; the difference is very subtle...

If you don't mind, I'm about to restore the correct values of applies to jurisdiction (P1001) for the Apostolic Nunciatures, using Quickstatement.

Regards, Pymouss (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ambassadors edit

Hello Cruzate1492! Why did you transform these? It got worse that way. Is there a discussion about this? Palotabarát (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please answer!
There are 3000 ambassadorial items, of which you have modified P31 in about 200, these need to be improved ... Palotabarát (talk) 09:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
no entiendo Inglés. Creo que las aportaciones que he hecho son positivas. Cruzate1492 (talk) 09:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yo tampoco hablo ingles. Yo no hablo español. Recomiendo usar esto: translate.google.com
  • Here is a table showing the structure : User:Metamorforme42/Ambassadors
  • Here is a list of all ambassadorial positions: query (cca 3000 items). What you have modified will never be included again.
  • Here is a list of all the faulty items: query (cca 250 items). These need to be fixed.
  • Before converting to such a volume, you need to talk to others about what to do.
Please fix the damaged items. Thanks. Palotabarát (talk) 09:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
tendré en cuenta las prescripciones para embajadores. Te ruego me indiques un ejemplo de Item correctamente cumplimentado Cruzate1492 (talk) 09:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, have a nice job! Palotabarát (talk) 10:45, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok. Muchas Gracias. Cualquier modificación que realice, la haré siguiendo ese ejemplo. Muchas gracias nuevamente. Un placer saludarte. Cruzate1492 (talk) 10:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
seria conveniente incluir el calificador opuesto a al incluir un embajador? Por ejemplo embajador de España en Estados Unidos opuesto a embajador de Estados Unidos en España. Qué opinas? Cruzate1492 (talk) 18:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, yes, that's how I do it. But not every position has the opposite item. Palotabarát (talk) 19:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gracias Cruzate1492 (talk) 19:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don’t think you create a new item, just fix the old ones. You really confused them, hundreds of items are now faulty. Palotabarát (talk) 00:50, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Cruzate1492! Didn't you fix these? Palotabarát (talk) 07:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
creo que los que había hecho mal están arreglados. Pero me he encontrado con otros que yo no había hecho y que también están mal informados. Cruzate1492 (talk) 07:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please review your previous edits, do not leave an item with a structure different from the vast majority. There are a lot of queries that list ambassadorial addresses, and the items you modified have disappeared from them. These need to be restored to their previous state (I thought you did). Thank! Palotabarát (talk) 10:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
desconozco el motivo por el que han desaparecido, pero dejé la estructura correcta. Te agradecería que si encuentras algún caso que no haya corregido me lo digas. Por favor. Cruzate1492 (talk) 10:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Palotabarát: as far as I can see Cruzate1492's edits were plausible, whereas Metamorforme42's schema doesn't really make sense. I commented on it in Talk:Q65262380 earlier, and also multiple other users pointed out the same years ago in User talk:Metamorforme42/Ambassadors. 2001:7D0:81C5:A580:4012:FE27:9CE9:C60E 14:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As I wrote earlier, there are currently 3,000 elements in the structure proposed by Metamorforme42. There are about 300 (10%) items that are different from this and cannot be found with the same query, i.e. they are lost for machine data retrieval.

Everything on Wikidata can be changed if there is controversy, consensus behind it, and someone makes sure the properties and values of the 3000 items change. But without a concept, rewriting a small number of items one by one is the worst thing that exists.

It is not me who needs to be persuaded, but those who have the means to change the data structure in 3,000 items in a short time. Palotabarát (talk) 10:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First of all, the fact that someone has laid down a systematic error at large scale does not mean that there is consensus. Quite clearly there isn't one per comments left next to Metamorforme42's schema years ago. Also, I don't think it'd be right to justify an obvious error with consensus. Instead we should seek for consensus between schemas that would actually make sense.
Of course eventually the data should be consistent at queryable, but compared to this concern it seems much much worse that the data in every associated item is unusable as misleading. I understand it's better to clean it up in short time. I hope someone has time capacity and/or technical resources for it. However, if the choice is between sticking around erroneous data, and fixing it over longer period of time, then the latter variant seems much better to me. It appears that you are the main force blocking other users from fixing this. Lately considerable effort has been made by serveral users to fix this. If you are not happy with the way it is being fixed then please propose some other schema that wouldn't be in clear conflict with Help:Basic membership properties. 2001:7D0:81C5:A580:7DBE:9796:A4ED:EAD 11:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sobre las descripciones en Wikidata edit

Hola Cruzate1492, las descripciones en español de Wikidata comienzan con minúsculas, y deben ser breves y concisas, por favor es necesario que leas Help:Description/es. Saludos --Madamebiblio (talk) 00:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Increíble. En agosto del año pasado el usuario Vanbasten 23 (talkcontribslogs) te avisó de que las descripciones tenían que ser concisas... pero no le hiciste ni caso y ni una contestación de cortesía. Hoy mismo, Madamebiblio (talkcontribslogs) vuelve a avisarte e incluso te enlaza la convención que trata sobre cómo describir ítems en Wikidata (y en español, para que lo entiendas sin problema): pues otra vez lo mismo, ni contestas o das acuse de recibo y, lo peor, continúas ignorando los mensajes (como se puede ver aquí, aquí, etc.). No me extraña que en eswiki alguien te preguntara si eres en realidad un bot. De todos modos, considera este como un tercer y último aviso. Dado que no colaboras ni dialogas con nadie, la próxima vez que te saltes las normas o convenciones de Wikidata te reportaré a los administradores. Porque los demás usuarios no tenemos la obligación de ir detrás de ti arreglando las entradas, como comprenderás. PedroAcero76 (talk) 22:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hola nuevamente, por tu comentario en mi PD, deberías recordar cuál el objetivo de este proyecto y las normas que aquí se utilizan, por lo tanto, copiar y pegar la entradilla del artículo en Wikipedia no es el uso correcto. Cuando dices «creo que hay que aclarar, para evitar errores posteriores» no se soluciona con redacciones extensas, se deben incluir referencias para validar los datos. Un saludo. --Madamebiblio (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why did you create a new item for Anglican clergyman (Q105200498)  ? edit

Can you share why it was necessary to create a new item? MassiveEartha (talk) 10:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Priest latin rite Q250867 vs. Priest latin rite Q1469535 edit

What is the difference? Ldhank (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

La diferencia es que el sacerdote católico es el sacerdote de cualquiera de las iglesias católicas, sean de rito latino o no. Un sacerdote de la iglesia católica ucraniana, es un sacerdote católico, pero no es un sacerdotes católico romano. Los sacerdotes católicos romanos sólo son los que siguen el rito latino, que sólo se sigue en una de las 24 iglesias católicas. El sacerdote católico es cualquiera de los sacerdotes de cualquiera de las 24 iglesias católicas. Un sacerdorte de la iglesia católica copta, tampoco es un sacerdote de rito latino, pero sin embargo si es un sacerdote católico. Cruzate1492 (talk) 06:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

La casa consistorial española (?) edit

No entiendo la utilidad de segregar un ítem genérico para "casa consistorial en España", como si fuera una tipología especial de algo y no simplemente una instancia (P31) de Q25550691 ubicada (P17) en Q29. En cualquier caso he retirado el enlace de es.wiki, pues este no trata sobre las casas consistoriales de España en particular (ni siquiera de las casas consistoriales en países hispanohablantes) sino que genéricamente versa sobre edificios que son sede de un gobierno local (esto es: casas consistoriales/ayuntamientos). Saludos. strakhov (talk) 04:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

como veas, yo había hecho esa diterencia, ya que también existe la pagina de casa consistorial de Alemania, pero insito, como tú veas. Cruzate1492 (talk) 09:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

elder (Q1155908) edit

Hallo Cruzate,

ihre deutschen Beschreibungen sind wohl ein Witz. Mir ist es egal, ob hier falsche und beleidigende Bezeichnungen stehen: Warum machen sie so etwas?-- Matiullah Jabarkhil (talk) 15:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Q115192744 edit

Hi Cruzate1492! I believe this item is not needed as the previous item has been renamed but is still alive. So it is not about termination and the creation of a new position, but about the preservation of an old position - under a different name. Pallor (talk) 12:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ancien évêque de Valence edit


Je viens de voir tes modifications pour les évêques de Valence en Ancien évêque de Valence. Cela pose un problème désormais dans les infobox sur la version française. Non seulement cela ne correspond pas au titre, mais en plus le lien vers la page des évêques disparaissent.

Je pense qu'il faut revoir cette intitulé qui, je pense, est erroné dans son intitulé (l'évêque est un évêque de Valence). B-noa (talk) 08:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Buenos días:
He ralizado la modificación sugerida. La intención es diferenciar a los antiguos obispos de Valence desde la fundación hata la fusión con la diócesis de Die (desde la fundación de la diócesis hasta 1275), de los obispos de Valence (1687-1911), con el fin de poder realizar una linea sucesoria clara. Cruzate1492 (talk) 09:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Je comprends le fond, mais la forme qui apparaît désormais n'est pas correct. Il est un évêque de Valence, c'est l'information qui apparait dans l'article. Le résumé introductif de l'encyclopédie ne dit pas qu'il a été un ancien évêque, mais qu'il est (présent de narration) un évêque. Je ne crois pas avoir lu de "Ancien roi de..." ou "Ancien pape" ou "Ancien roi de...", donc pourquoi créer cela pour les évêques ? --B-noa (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Je viens seulement de voir que tu avais corrigé l'intitulé après l'échange (il y a un décallage dans la correction en ligne). Merci.
Sachant qu'il n'existe qu'une liste regroupant tous les évêques, ne peut-on pas l'insérer dans l'item "Ancien évêque de Valence", permettant une meilleur navigation ?
Je profite de l'occasion pour te remercier pour le travail parallèle que j'ai observé ces dernières semaines sur les autres catégories sur lesquelles on se croise. --B-noa (talk) 11:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
el "antiguo obispo de Valence" es sucedido por obispo de Valence y Die y este es sucedido por obispo de Valence (1687-1911) y este es sucedido por obispo de Valence, Die et Saint-Paul-Trois-Châteaux. Lo puedes ver en la página de discusión de cada elemento. todos son obispos de Velence, pero en algunos casos lo son además de otros lugares Cruzate1492 (talk) 11:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Merci pour la correction et les liens. B-noa (talk) 21:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Using arabic in English descriptions edit

In qalat (Q7265965) you added arabic to the English description. I think its better to only use English there. Vicarage (talk) 15:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Automated report of empty item: Q114344833 edit

Hello, an item that you have edited (and you are the only non-bot editor) is considered empty and will be deleted in 72 hours if it doesn't improve. Your automated cleaner, Dexbot (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Escudos y Escudos edit

Hola. ¡Gracias por tu edición en Q117786105!

La voy a modificar y te explico. En realidad no es un escudo, es un relieve (que representa un escudo). Durante mucho tiempo les ponía a estas cosas como "instancia de" escudo, y luego algunas propiedades me daban avisos. No sé dónde encontré que eran relieves, pero los relieves son subclase de elementos arquitectónicos, y estos chismes son elementos arquitectónicos (si ten caen en la cabeza, duelen). Es sutil, pero funciona.

He subido recientemente unos 30000 Qs (no llegan, unos 28000 y pico) de bienes inmuebles protegidos de la Comunidad Valenciana, así que si ves que pone "instancia de: construcción" y no está referenciado, no te cortes de cambiarlo por algo mejor. Hay algún caso raro en que no hay nada mejor, pero hay fábricas, muros, torres, casas consistoriales... lo que quieras. B25es (talk) 14:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

muchas gracias por tu comentario. Lo tendré en cuenta Cruzate1492 (talk) 14:52, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Same thing edit

Q113468884 and Q625356 are the exact same thing! The "Congregation" was renamed to "Dicastery" but that is the only difference: a new name. Veverve (talk) 08:02, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

yo entiendo que no es lo mismo, dado que el dicasterio está definido según el artículo 69 de la constitución apostólica Praedicate evangelium Cruzate1492 (talk) 08:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Es lo mismo. It is the same. It simply changed name. Do you get what I mean? If an institution's name changes, this does not create a new institution: it is the same institution under another name. Veverve (talk) 08:16, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
El caso es que hay dos artículos distintos, uno por cada nombre en muchas wikis y existen dos items distintos, uno para la congregacion y otro para el dicasterio. Creo que es mas correcto decir que uno sucede al otro, que no que son lo mismo, pero no voy a entrar en discusiones. Haz lo que creas oportuno. No voy a tocarlo más. Cruzate1492 (talk) 08:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If some wikiprojects prefer to have two articles instead of simply renaming the previous one, for whatever reason, it is their decision and not mine. The fact remains that it is the same institution, whatever its name. Veverve (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
He abierto una página de discusión para que nos aporten los criterios a seguir. ¿OK? Cruzate1492 (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reverted edit edit

Since you reverted the merge between Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cologne (Q105070728) and Roman Catholic Archbishop of Berlin (Q105070751), I would like to inquire what you believe the difference between the items to be. Thanks in advance. Asav (talk) 13:30, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Archdiocese of Cologne is different from the Archdiocese of Berlin and the positions held by the leaders are different. Like the king of Spain, he is different from the king of Sweden. Both are kings, but with different jurisdictions. Cruzate1492 (talk) 16:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discusión sobre la función episcopal episcopal function (Q21114371) edit

Por favor vea y comente Wikidata talk:WikiProject Religions#Diocesan bishops or "episcopal function". Elizium23 (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Diocèse d'Uzès edit

Hello ¿ No serían estos dos duplicados Q114961190 & Q23597042 ? B-noa (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

efectivamente. Gracias por avisar. Los he fusionado Cruzate1492 (talk) 08:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]