User talk:Daniel Baránek/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikidata, Daniel Baránek!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! --VIGNERON (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Farnosti

Parádní import farností! Díky :) Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 20:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

We sent you an e-mail

Hello Daniel Baránek/Archive 1,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Mass removal of collections

Hold on Daniel, what are you doing? Please stop mass removing collections like [1] and [2]. Can you please explain what you're doing? Multichill (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Please, see the changes I am doing as a whole: [3]. I am removing "collection" which is not collection, but museum. That is, I am replacing museum by the collection. Is it clear? --Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:13, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Stop it now please. You're welcome to add extra collection statements, but removing existing well sourced collection statements is not acceptable. The collection (P195) is for the collection holder or which collection it's in. Removing the collection holder is destructive. Please undo your removals. Multichill (talk) 17:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

I am not removing, but replacing. Museum is not collection. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Stop it please, it's just more work for you to restore it. Don't make me stop it. Multichill (talk) 17:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked for continued usage of an automated tool after being asked to stop.

If someone disputes your automated edits, you're supposed to stop and discus. You continued to edit instead.

A painting can have multiple collection (P195) at the same time. This is actually very common, see for example The Night Watch (Q219831). We record this as multiple statements, not by replacing statements. Multichill (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

I am glad that You understand my arguments sent by e-mail. However, I still don't know, whether You agree that I continue with editing or You demand wider discussion. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Explanation contained in the e-mail for others: In the Czech Republic, the museal collections are registered in the Central Collections Register, administrated by the Ministry of Culture. Each museum can have more than one collection. So I created an entity for each registered collection (for example https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q101018049). Each entity contains information about owner and manager of the collection and link to the Central Collections Register. At Wikidata, there is an property "Collection", which in the case of the most artefacts linked not to the real collection, but to the museum. So I have fixed the link to the collection. Any information was lost. On the contrary, information about owner, manager and about an entry in the CCR was added. So I do not really undestand, what is You problem. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Can you hold off mass editing? Will get back later. Hoping Fuzheado will respond in the meantime. Multichill (talk) 22:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Sure, I am waiting. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 06:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I have asked Fuzheado for his opinion. For now, just one more argument. At Wikimedia Commons, there are categories for collections (for Czechia see commons:Category:Collections in the Czech Republic by museum). If such category exists for some museum, its artifacts are logically sorted to collection category, not to museum category. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 09:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

@Multichill: I am still waiting... I still did not get single one reason, why not to fix the information about collections. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 19:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Multichill: Daniel's edits seem OK to me but I might be missing something. collection (P195) has very wide subject type constraint (Q21503250) but I always thought that it's mainly intended for instances of collection (Q2668072) and not museums. Anyway, the removed statements are not referenced and it is therefore very hard to argue for their validity.Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

The addition of the extra collection is might correct, but the removal of existing statements sure is not correct. For one the inventory numbers don't add up anymore and that caused a constraint violation on every item you edited. Also it's very uncommon to create these dummy art collection items that just link to one museum. These just make the data harder to handle. Multichill (talk) 13:08, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

It is hard to discuss with somebody, who ignores the results of museological science and calls art collections as "dummy items". These "dummy items" are created by each museum and in the case of the Czech Republic, they are registered in the Central Collections Register. Again, property collection (P195) should link to the collection, not to the museum. The museum could be linked (and sometimes is) by adding the property maintained by (P126) (it would duplicate the information in the collection entity, however). However, it is hard to discuss with person, who doesn't here these expert arguments and who's only argument is "I simply don't like Your edits, I am admin and I will block You, if You continue." Well, I don't have desire to add any more information about Czech museal collections and professionalize it. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 10:32, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

You don't want to use the argument from authority. The only reason your account got blocked is because you had an automated tool running. Our data model is an abstraction of the real world. In our current model here on Wikidata for collection (P195) we put the collection holder if it's a one on one relation between the organization and the collection. If you want to change that, you have to establish consensus first. I don't think this would improve our data model. We don't try to go as extreme as something like CIDOC CRM and I'm not sure if they even make this distinction. Don't forget our data model is worldwide, it also has to make sense outside of the Czech Republic. Multichill (talk) 18:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

You are not right. The description of collection (P195) says: "art, museum, archival, or bibliographic collection the subject is part of". Not "museum" but "museum collection". If there are museums in this property, it is imperfection, which should be improved. But this imperfection should not be an argument against improvement. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 18:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

For collection holder or administrator, we have property maintained by (P126) or owned by (P127). Why not to use the proper property? --Daniel Baránek (talk) 21:06, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

@Multichill: I see, that You have nothing to say... So I will continue in my improvements, if You have any arguments againts it. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 13:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

You can also add owned by (P127) as described at Wikidata:WikiProject Visual arts/Item structure. In the current model we don't use maintained by (P126) for individual works and it doesn't really fit well. For any changes to the model you should get consensus first. Multichill (talk) 13:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Well, the thing is, that the owner is very often not a museum, but the state. Museum is only administrator of the work. I would prefer adding both values, maintained by (P126) and owned by (P127). --Daniel Baránek (talk) 13:34, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

So you have owned by (P127) set to the state and collection (P195) set to museum. Also adding maintained by (P126) feels a bit redundant, I would like to get some broader input on that. Multichill (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Let's continue here: Wikidata talk:WikiProject Visual arts/Item structure#Collections modelling. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 09:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Modelling of holocaust victim

Please have a look at Talk:Q2763#Modelling of holocaust victim. Thanks, Multichill (talk) 19:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Matriky UK

Díky za ten import z matrik UK! Možná by si to zasloužilo i samostnatnou vlastnost nebo alespoň nalinkovat přes described at URL (P973). Jinak máme zde na Wikidatech také Wikidata:WikiProject Czech Republic, kde je možné probírat lokální věci a třeba FB skupina je teď hodně aktivní. A pokud už neznáte, dovolil bych si ještě doporučit Wikidata:Tools/OpenRefine, což je na importy velmi praktický nástroj.--Jklamo (talk) 11:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Díky za tipy. OpenRefine používám, je to opravdu šikovný nástroj. Jen to nechávám exportovat do QuickStatements. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Tobias1984 Vojtěch Dostál YjM Jklamo Walter Klosse Sintakso Matěj Suchánek JAn Dudík Skim Frettie Jura1913 Mormegil Jedudedek marv1N Sapfan Daniel Baránek Draceane Michal Josef Špaček (WMCZ) The photonaut Hartasek Zelenymuzik Gumruch Shadster Dænča M.Rejha Janek Jan Kameníček Eva Vele Linda.jansova Lukša Packa Fukejs Hugo Xmorave2 J.Broukal Lenkakrizova Steam Flow Pavel Bednařík Sanqui

Notified participants of WikiProject Czech Republic: Založil jsem návrh vlastnosti. Dělám to poprvé, tak snad je vše správně. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 20:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Tady byla chyba (přiřazení k jiné osobě zjevně stejného jména). — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 17:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Díky. Páruji i pomocí data narození, ale občas se asi chyba vloudí. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Střední zdravotnická škola Evangelické akademie, Brno (Q102127608)

Ahoj, díky za vytvoření položky Q102127608. S tímhle vůbec nemám zkušenosti, je nějaká možnost, jak to napojit na položku organizace Q42259851? Díky.--Ben Skála (talk) 13:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Ahoj, ano, pomocí collection creator (P6241). --Daniel Baránek (talk) 13:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Maxmilián

Hello Daniel! Not good though ... Maxmilian and Maximilian not the same. There is a difference in the letter i: Maximilián. Palotabarát (talk) 09:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. My fault. I am going to fix it. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 09:59, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Holocaust-Transporte

Hallo Daniel,

du hast bei vielen Holocaust-Transporten wie z.B. Q76356693 als geografischen Startort Q94528 angegeben, ich denke aber, dass der Startort Q1741 ist, würdest du das bitte prüfen und ggf. berichtigen.

Viele Grüße --McSearch (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Hallo McSearch, du hast recht. Danke für den Hinweis. Ich werde es sofort reparieren. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Q104449050 – Q104449088

Hallo, du hast meinen Merge von Q104449050 und Q104449088 revertiert – zu Recht. Der Grund, warum ich ziemlich sicher war, ist dass die Todesurkunden in der Quelle vertauscht sind (und ich nur bei einer nachgeschaut habe). Siehst du eine Möglichkeit, das an holocaust.cz zu melden, damit die Verwechslung der Urkunden dort behoben wird? --Emu (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, danke für die Erklärung. Ja, ich werde es melden. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 13:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Namen aus der USHMM-Personen-Datenbank

Du hast gestern einige name (P2561) aus der Holocaust persons database (Q32321202) hinzugefügt. Ist Dir bewusst, dass die Nachnamen alle in Majuskelschrift sind? Z. B. bei Arthur Hauptmann (Q61196216) hattest Du bereits aus einer anderen Quelle einen Namen mit einfacher Großschreibung. Außerdem: name in native language (P1559) hätte vllt. besser gepasst? Und wieso ist der Name mehrsprachig (mul) und nicht in einer unbekannten Sprache (und)? --CamelCaseNick (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, ich weiß über die Majuskulen. Sie sind in der Quelle angeführt, aber ich bestehe nicht darauf. Ich meine, dass name in native language (P1559) is nicht besser, weil wir kennen die Muttersprache der Opfer in diesem Moment meistens nicht. (Es gilt vor allem für die Juden aus böhmischen Ländern, weil wir kennen die Muttersprache nicht ohne eines Studium anderen Quellen. Mehrheit der Juden waren überdies zwei- oder vielsprächig.) Ich habe mul ausgewählt, weil USHMM-Name ist die Name, die im Deutsch und Englisch benutzt ist. Aber nochmals, ich bestehe nicht auf mul. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 12:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Ja, stimmt, da hast Du recht: name in native language (P1559) ist wohl doch eher ungeeignet hier und name (P2561) eine vernünftige Wahl. Ich denke und wäre die ehrlichere Sprache, denn das USHMM hat auch keine expliziten Angaben zur Mehrsprachigkeit. Ich denke, zumindest falls der Name im Wesentlichen schon vorhanden ist – wie im Fall oben, könnte man die Aussagen zusammenführen? (Dabei ist mir übrigens aufgefallen, aus derselben Quelle hast Du schon zweimal den Namen hinzugefügt, z. B. bei Fanny David (Q1395744).) --CamelCaseNick (talk) 01:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Die Aussagen können sicher zusammengeführt sein. Ja, und wäre die ehrlichere Sprache. Duplikate wurden beim Importieren versehentlich erstellt und können sicherlich entfernt werden. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 08:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Eigenschaft für The Database of Victims of the Nazi Persecution (Q104074149)?

Da Du bereits über 40 000 human (Q5) mit Einzelnachweisen aus The Database of Victims of the Nazi Persecution (Q104074149) versehen hast, wäre nicht evtl. ein property proposal angebracht? --CamelCaseNick (talk) 01:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Ich habe das property proposal aus zwei Gründen nicht angebracht:

1. der Identifikator ist nicht klar. Jede Sprache hat andere Adrese. Z. B. tschechisch: https://www.holocaust.cz/databaze-obeti/obet/147854-malvina-voglova/, englisch: https://www.holocaust.cz/en/database-of-victims/victim/147854-malvina-voglova/, deutsch:https://www.holocaust.cz/de/opferdatenbank/opfer/147854-malvina-voglova/. Ja, wir können z. B. englische Sprache als der Resolver und 147854-malvina-voglova als der Identifikator wählen, aber ...
2. ich bin nicht über die Stabilität des Identifikators überzeugt. Holocaust.cz hat von einigen Jahren der numerische Identifikator (von http://www.holocaust.cz/cz/victims/PERSON.ITI.1111111) zu jetzigen Form geändert und ich bin nicht sicher, ob eine ähnliche Änderung morgen stattfinden kann. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 08:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

1. Das scheint mir kein Problem. Der Identifikator wäre hier doch nur 147854. Das Format lässt sich mit formatter URL (P1630) relativ einfach anpassen. Das Format wäre z. B. hier https://www.holocaust.cz/en/database-of-victims/victim/$1/. (Bei formatter URL (P1630) ist auch language of work or name (P407) als Qualifikator zulässig.)
2. Es ist aber wohl ein Grund, dass sie von den siebenstelligen auf sechsstellige IDs (etwa bei Gustav Schorsch (Q18564442) von 1825058 zu 122183) gewechselt sind ohne Weiterleitung. --CamelCaseNick (talk) 17:29, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

OK, ich habe Wikidata:Property proposal/Holocaust.cz ID erstellt. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Vladislav vs Владислав

Ahoj, narazil jsem už na dvě tvé změny, kde přidáváš given name (P735) v ruské formě pro člověka, který je Čech. Výsledkem je situace, kdy je tam uvedena verze v latince i cyrilici (Vladislav (Q19826494) a Vladislav (Q945863)). Viz tady. Já to odstraňuji, protože je pravděpodobnější ta verze v latince. Pokud by to bylo jinak, bylo by dobré to nějak zdůvodnit. Hezký den. Skim (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Ahoj, tak to jsem se musel v OpenRefine překliknout a oprava je určitě vítaná. Díky. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 07:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok, dík. Skim (talk) 10:08, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Q95383308 - EZO

Hezký den Danieli, tady to nějak zlobí: Q95383308. Místo "URL reference" bych používal asi vlastnost URL (P2699). A připadá mi zbytečné to tam mít třikrát, nebo je to výjimka? :) Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 15:46, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Děkuji za upozornění, tady se opravdu chybka vloudila. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 15:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Jasně, sám to znám, že se to při velkých importech prostě občas stane :)Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Bertha Heimann

Ad: Bertha Heimann: Sorry for my mistake in maintaining the data sets. I meant the chemist and science historian Bertha Heimann, born on March 19, 1890 in Luckenwalde (Brandenburg), daughter of Felix Heimann. I'm still relatively new to Wikidata and have been too careless. Many Thanks for the correction --Wamito (talk) 06:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

It's all right. Everybody makes mistakes. Just be careful while merging items. If nobody notice the mistake and other edits are done, it is quite to hard fix (split) the merger. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 20:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

== Karl Hirsch (Q98907801) ==

Hallo, ich befürchte, die Zuordnung bei Karl Hirsch (Q98907801) ist nicht korrekt. Name und Geburtsdatum stimmen zwar, aber der Prager Student ist in Hohenhradek geboren, die Eltern hießen Joseph und Maria. Der eigentlich Gemeinte ist in Eggern geboren, seine Eltern hießen laut Taufbuch Anton und Katharina. Vielleicht könntest du hier drüberschauen? Danke! --Emu (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, du hast recht. Die Eltern sind nicht die gleiche und Karl Hirsch an der Prager Uni war jüdisch (mos.). Interesanter Zufall :) --Daniel Baránek (talk) 19:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Místo narození - Vídeň,Karlín

Dobrý den Danieli, pozor na místo narození - Vídeň, jako zde: Q12026067#P19. Došlo k pomýlení mezi Vídeň (Q94528) a Vienna (Q1741). Pravděpodobně se to bude týkat několika desítek tvrzení ozdrojovaných EZO (https://w.wiki/xXM).

A stejný problém je u místo narození: Karlín - popleten Karlín (Q929698) a Karlín (Q1734030), pochází to z Students of the Universities of Prague 1882–1945 (Q102399391) a týká se to 27 položek (https://w.wiki/xXQ) Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Díky za upozornění. O české Vídni vím, ale občas mi to v OpenRefine uteče. Dám to do pořádku. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 17:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

== Rudolf Fischer (Q88008015) ==

Hallo, könntest du dir Rudolf Fischer (Q88008015) anschauen? Ich vermute stark, dass das eine andere Person ist (anderes Geburtsdatum, anderer Geburtsort als im Artikel in der deutschen Wikipedia, für den das Item angelegt wurde). Danke! --Emu (talk) 20:06, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Ich zustimme, danke. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 20:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Doktorat

Hallo, du hast bei Amalie Sobel (Q98346482) und vermutlich über 1000 anderen als akademischen Grad Q22978132 eingetragen. Soweit ich dieses Item verstehe, bezieht es sich nur auf bestimmte tschechische Doktorate in den 1990ern. Wahrscheinlich war doctorate (Q849697) gemeint? --Emu (talk) 17:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Emu, danke für den Hinweis. Du hast recht. Ich benutzte doctorate (Q849697) nicht, weil diese Entität als "Doktorstudium" in tschechische Sprache beschrieben wurde. Ich korrigierte die Beschreibung und ich werde auch die Anwendung dieser Entität verändern. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 07:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Some improvements

• Most items should have a manner of death (P1196)
• holocaust.cz provides family relationship of some people, which may be imported.

--GZWDer (talk) 19:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for Your interest. Which manner of death (P1196) do You propose? Not all of the victims were homicide (Q149086) in the strict sense (killed in gas chambers or shooted). Many died on illness caused by bad conditions in Theresienstadt ghetto. Some died during death march (Q326259).

Can You give me a link to a person, where family relations are provided? Thanks. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

e.g. [4] and [5], see "related persons". Are some people not actually murdered even stated so in the website?--GZWDer (talk) 08:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the links, I have not noticed this infobox. I will think, what do to with it.

Well, in the English version is "Murdered", however in the Czech version is "Zahynul", which simply means "Died". I think, that the Czech version is more fair and the English version too much simplifying. I understand Your view and we can surely add some cause of death. However, we have to find the right entity to use, because I don't think that homicide (Q149086) is appropriate. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

[WMF Board of Trustees - Call for feedback: Community Board seats] Meetings with the Wikidata community

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is organizing a call for feedback about community selection processes between February 1 and March 14. While the Wikimedia Foundation and the movement have grown about five times in the past ten years, the Board’s structure and processes have remained basically the same. As the Board is designed today, we have a problem of capacity, performance, and lack of representation of the movement’s diversity. Our current processes to select individual volunteer and affiliate seats have some limitations. Direct elections tend to favor candidates from the leading language communities, regardless of how relevant their skills and experience might be in serving as a Board member, or contributing to the ability of the Board to perform its specific responsibilities. It is also a fact that the current processes have favored volunteers from North America and Western Europe. In the upcoming months, we need to renew three community seats and appoint three more community members in the new seats. This call for feedback is to see what processes can we all collaboratively design to promote and choose candidates that represent our movement and are prepared with the experience, skills, and insight to perform as trustees?

In this regard, two rounds of feedback meetings are being hosted to collect feedback from the Wikidata community. Two rounds are being hosted with the same agenda, to accomodate people from various time zones across the globe. We will be discussing ideas proposed by the Board and the community to address the above mentioned problems. Please sign-up according to whatever is most comfortable to you. You are welcome to participate in both as well!

• Round 1 - Feb 24, 4:00 pm UTC
• Round 2 - Mar 3, 4:00 am UTC
• Sign-up and meeting details: Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees/Call for feedback: Community Board seats/Conversations/Wikidata

Also, please share this with other volunteers who might be interested in this. Let me know if you have any questions. KCVelaga (WMF), 14:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Jan Schneider a Břevnovský hřbitov

Zdravím, u položky Q12023068 jsem našel údaj z 13. ledna 2020 o tom, že Jan Schneider je pohřben na Břevnovském hřbitově v Praze. Bohužel bez uvedení reference, takže zdroj té informace nemůžu prověřit. Když jsem teď rozepisoval článek Jan Schneider na české Wikipedii, objevil jsem v iReportu, že byl pohřben v Písku. Je možné, že by v Praze ležel jiný Jan Schneider? Nebo že by byl ten písecký dodatečně přenesen? Anebo došlo k nějaké chybě? Pokud není Břevnovský hřbitov zdrojovaný a je ten údaj v rozporu s existujícím zdrojem, byl bych pro jeho odstranění. --Bazi (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Doplnil jsem zdroj. Bohužel se jedná o publikaci Břevnovského kláštera bez ISBN, takže není běžně v knihovnách. Ale na dané stránce je i fotografie hrobu, číslo hrobu a info o osobnosti, které se shoduje s "naším" Janem Schneiderem. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 11:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

PS: Břevnovský hřbitov mám za rohem, tak mohu příležitostně pořídit fotografii. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 11:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

PPS: Vlastně jsem jednu našel z loňska. Není moc kvalitní, ale lepší než nic. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 12:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Marie Eleonore Pfungst / Marie Eleonore Pfingst

Hallo, beim Eintrag auf holocaust.cz 27382 für Marie Eleonore Pfungst (Q118166) wurde offenbar ein Fehler bei der Transkription vorgenommen, das U mit einem seltsamen Strich darüber wurde als I gelesen. Könntest du das den Verantwortlichen weiterleiten? Danke! --Emu (talk) 10:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Dr. Pincus

You are a researcher at the Jewish Museum in Prague and have added a lot of victims with Holocaust.cz person ID (P9109), so is it possible you have connections there to answer, whether Friedrich Pincus (Q58431450) and Friedrich Pincus (Q105463458) are actually the same? (Frieda might be just a nickname (Q49614)?) --CamelCaseNick (talk) 13:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)