Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2017/06/17
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Q30313672: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable human, no wikipedia link PokestarFan • Drink some tea and talk with me • Stalk my edits • I'm not shouting, I just like this font! 02:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jared Preston (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Q11777088: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unclear use d1g (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by Jared Preston (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Q28108234: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty Queryzo (talk) 20:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hopefully I added enough correct statements? Q.Zanden questions? 22:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- @QZanden: Do we have any structural need for this item? —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- @MisterSynergy: I don't know, that's up to the admins. I consider myself as an inclusionist. I like more adding data to empty items than to nominate them for deletion. Except for clear unnotability like #Empty items from User:AliciaFagervingWMSE-bot. Have a nice day! Q.Zanden questions? 12:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- @QZanden: Do we have any structural need for this item? —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- It is sometimes difficult to distinguish between pure promotional activities (which we don’t want) and useful stuff that only looks like promotional activity. I would feel more comfortable if there was some use of this item, but I will not delete it (I’m basically an inclusionist as well, unless promotional activity is involved). Next admin shall decide. —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Overtones (Q29949112): theatre troupe from Neuchâtel, Switzerland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Is this group notable? Queryzo (talk) 22:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Affom: Do we have online access to the Panorama (Q29652168)? This item has an identifier to this collection, but I cannot verify anything. Same applies to #Q29957717 below. Thanks, MisterSynergy (talk) 09:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- There is no, or better not yet, an online access to the collection of the STS (Swiss Theatre Collection). It is an ongoing project to make the whole collection available for the public. First on Wikidata and later on another Linked Data database. The group mentioned is a real theatre troupe from Switzerland of which the STS has information collected in its physical archive. The identifier is an internal identifier used by the STS. As it is not yet available online, we chose to take a generic property Property:P217 as identifier property. Affom (talk) 16:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- I don't like this approach: we use an ipotetic collection that none can acces (free or paid) to say that someone is notable. I prefer waiting for that the collection is available. For me the item must be deleted. --ValterVB (talk) 16:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- I disagree. Of course it is preferable if a collection is accessible online, but for whatever reason some institutions did not manage to prepare that until today, mid 2017. This one seemingly spends some effort into development of an online catalogue, so it is fine anyway. As long as the institution has reputation, which is the case here, we can assume that its collection is about notable entities and therefore keep the item. Next admin should decide and close… —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- There is actually an additional benefit of including it in Wikidata if it isn't already available everywhere else.
--- Jura 15:00, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- There is actually an additional benefit of including it in Wikidata if it isn't already available everywhere else.
- I disagree. Of course it is preferable if a collection is accessible online, but for whatever reason some institutions did not manage to prepare that until today, mid 2017. This one seemingly spends some effort into development of an online catalogue, so it is fine anyway. As long as the institution has reputation, which is the case here, we can assume that its collection is about notable entities and therefore keep the item. Next admin should decide and close… —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for releasing it at Wikidata! d1g (talk) 13:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Not deleted Described by reliable source. Lymantria (talk) 06:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Sanduhr (Q29957717): theatre troupe from Zurich, Switzerland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability not shown PokestarFan • Drink some tea and talk with me • Stalk my edits • I'm not shouting, I just like this font! 22:14, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- The standard that notability has to be shown is a Wikipedia standard and thus it's no argument why an item should be deleted. What matters is whether the concept behind the item is notable. In this case the concept has an inventory number that sources Panorama (Q29652168), which suggests it's notable. In general nominating items that are created by a GLAM effort without engaging in any effort to talk with the GLAM institution that created the item is also bad form. ChristianKl (talk) 10:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Comment @Affom: Somehow the inventory number (P217)-statement needs fixing. For P217, I'd expect it to use a qualifier collection (P195) to mention the collection instead of "stated in". As it's not something physically held at the institution, maybe catalog code (P528) with catalog (P972) seems more appropriate. A bot could easily convert that.
--- Jura 14:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Not deleted Reliable reference. Lymantria (talk) 06:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Weasley family (Q5839530): fictional family: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Merged with duplicated page Hariva (talk) 03:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:40, 17 June 2017 (UTC)- Done Redirect created by Lymantria, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Delta unguiculatum (Q668936): species of insect: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Same as Q14395960; the correct name is "unguiculatum" Syrio posso aiutare? 15:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.
- Comment: really it is a duplicate (http://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/366886-Delta-unguiculata). You could redirect it to Delta unguiculatum (Q14395960). --Metrónomo (talk) 00:52, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Keep they are different. Compare the labels side by side.
Delta unguiculatum (Q668936)|Delta unguiculatum (Q14395960)
Notice the difference. PokestarFan • Drink some tea and talk with me • Stalk my edits • I'm not shouting, I just like this font! 02:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Done Merged. Lymantria (talk) 08:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
after-name (Q12001444): unofficial names that have not been invented by the person concerned or their family: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Items moved to Q4116295 Kind regards, Rodejong 💬 ✉️ 06:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by HakanIST, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Q30317394: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Wrong name Bahnfrend (talk) 09:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Q30311717: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
/doc
--- Jura 09:51, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Q18193658: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty, unnotable Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Q28847454: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted elsewhere Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Lajos Matos (Q30320085): Hungarian cardiologist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unnecessary duplicate of Q30320093 --Akela (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Not deleted. Merged inversely. Jared Preston (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Robert Drapier (Q30319849): French politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate of Q19629699 --Thieol (talk) 14:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by Jared Preston, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Q29110449: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Is this really necessary --MistressData (talk) 02:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Used as (very confusing formed) reference. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- I think that the necessary meaning can be expressed with type of reference (P3865), afterwards this item could be deleted. ChristianKl (talk) 10:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Used as (very confusing formed) reference. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by Jared Preston (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Q16866338: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted in en:wp --Steak (talk) 17:36, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Gull Lake (Q22654021): town in Saskatchewan, Canada: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Merged with Q1911196 --Commonssense (talk) 20:58, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by PLbot, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)