Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/06/21

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q107242387

Q107242387: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wait for en deletion Rockpeterson (talk) 08:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Q84176927

Category:Storfjord (ship, 2011) (Q84176927) doesn't seem to serve any purpose. Btw. is there any equivalent to tagging items for speedy delete on WD? --Infrastruktur wdt:P31 wd:Q5 (T | C) 09:57, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Nevermind. --Infrastruktur wdt:P31 wd:Q5 (T | C) 10:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Not done --Fralambert (talk) 00:50, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Zxprmedia (talk) 01:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107301241

Q107301241: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Junk/senseless. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 18:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Q107302711

Q107302711: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There's no notability, and only contains nonsense words. . Symphonium264 (talk) 23:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106754713

Q106754713: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 10:45, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Info Item creator User:MbuziMee has asked on my discussion page for a “few more days to add identifiers and more valid references”. --Emu (talk) 08:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Q60891323

Q60891323: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable; no sitelinks, identifiers, links in, or references Jamie7687 (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Delete no identifiers --Palaangelino (talk) 23:44, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Delete Almost empty , Notability issue.--WMEOIRHGU (talk) 18:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106887438

Q106887438: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I've created this item as a source reference for one statement in Q106887266, but after consideration, I've change the statements there and reference was no longer required. Moreover, I have problems with collecting the data about this item, I've started creating the item before fully checking if I have necessary information (I had only title from PL Wiki). --Lord Ya (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106622398

Q106622398: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 16:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Q106715007

Q106715007: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Aranya (talk) 01:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:20, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep – for better or worse, Verified Handles IDs are a property (though I have no idea how widely they're used), so it would be somewhat incongruous to judge VH's founder insufficiently notable.
Keep - satisfies WD:N criteria 2 and 3. 3 per above and 2 from publicly available references proving existance.^[1]^[2]^[3]^[4]