Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/01/25

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q110674887

Q110674887: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake --Genium . 02:23, Jan 25, 2022 (UTC+01:00)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q55720693

François Adriaan van der Kemp (Q55720693): Dutch politician and minister (1752–1829): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is another one: Q2183360, that had already links to two Wikipedias. I think one is enough. I copied all the declarations to this other item. Please check Q2183360, because there are now some flags and ! and I have not enough knowledge of Wikidata to solve these problems. --JopkeB (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:DeltaBot, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110627622

Does not meet notability criteria Gymnicus (talk) 08:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Back ache, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q1632338

Narrillos del Álamo (Q1632338): human settlement in Province of Ávila, Castile and León, Spain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate --Xemenendura (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Q24009086 you have to link it to Q1632338 – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xemenendura (talk • contribs) at 17:58, 24 January 2022‎ (UTC).

Not done This seem to be two different concepts: One item for the municipality and one for the capital of the municipality. Both items have related sitelinks in cebwiki and svwiki. --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q3568031

Q3568031: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unnecessary item Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110670424

Q110670424: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Entry duplicating Q47008355 --Bzhqc (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q13216985

Fringillidae (Q13216985): family of birds: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Should be Q160835; I coul not correct it otherwise Lucyin (talk) 21:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Done redirect created. --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110671561

Q110671561: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Accidentally created Sabelöga (talk) 23:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110670480

Q110670480: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 23:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ladsgroup (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110670762

Q110670762: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, cannot ascertain who this is supposed to be. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 23:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110670950

Q110670950: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, self-promotion? Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 23:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110667310

Q110667310: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, self-promotion. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Gnoeee (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110665010

Q110665010: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, created by a SPA located where the subject is noted to reside, real person but does not meet notability criteria. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110664674

Q110664674: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N, no evidence of notability. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:03, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ladsgroup (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110662877

Q110662877: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q108531640

Q108531640: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax Bluemask (talk) 01:55, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110677713

Q110677713: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 07:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110677698

Q110677698: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion, not notable as well Rockpeterson (talk) 07:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110111875

Q110111875: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability criteria Gymnicus (talk) 09:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q100243200

Request for deletion Q100243200

Q48119405 and Q100243200 refer to the same scientific article "Relationship between vitamin E content and susceptibility to lipid peroxidation in tissues of the newly hatched chick." Q48119405 contains more information (Pubmed ID and description are not given in Q100243200) --Eva (talk) 13:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Emu, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

English adjectives insubordinately imported by GZWDer (flood)

The import was done in nov 2020. None of these items make any sense and the source WordData seems bogus/unreliable when it comes to adjectives. See the example adjective reasoning (L339763) which is not found in other dictionaries.

We who edit lexemes would like others to first seek approval before mass editing or adding lexemes because we have seen that there are many things that can go wrong.

All items are here: https://w.wiki/w7P CC @Nikki, GZWDer:--So9q (talk) 15:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

I am going to check other dictionaries and please wait for some time.--GZWDer (talk) 15:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@So9q: Minus entries found in English Wiktionary, 1124 left (this is still not do be deleted for now, as I am going to filter it further).--GZWDer (talk) 15:42, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Wait leaning toward

Delete (given that on Wikidata talk:Lexicographical data the discussion went mostly nowhere...). All of this import are useless right now and most of them are not truly lexemes (being in a dictionary - Wiktionary or not - is not enough to be a Lexemes), at the very least a *lot* of cleaning is needed. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: The category I compared with is wikt:Category:English adjectives, which contains only lexeme (at least in Wiktionary's POV). Previously there are a number of English adverbs imported from Wiktionary, and they does not seems more reliable than 7315 (=8439-1124) adjectives matched.--GZWDer (talk) 17:45, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@GZWDer: no, it obviously does not. Right at the beggining, I see 0D and 0d which is the same lexeme (not even by Wiktionary's POV, the second one explicitely says it the same lexeme as the first!). And just because other data are bad is not an excuse at all to add more bad data. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:52, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: I'm not planning to add more (without a discussion first), but previously there're some large import from Wiktionary, see Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/SixTwoEightBot.--GZWDer (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@GZWDer: yes there was a lot of import ; this specific import was a bit poor but it seems to be mostly good. Sorry to be blunt but yours is mostly bad. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: My comment above said there are 7315 entries found in English Wiktionary and 1124 not found. Should we only focus on the latter?--GZWDer (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@GZWDer: not sure to understand and we should focus and having good data (with a good source - en.wikt alone is not ideal, it should be cross-referenced with an other source - and a good data processing - for example adding at least one form). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: one of 19191 adverbs imported from Wiktionary and one of 7315 adjectives imported from WordData that may be found in Wiktionary. I think the only problematic thing is 1124 adjectives that can not be found in Wiktionary.--GZWDer (talk) 17:03, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Maybe this other import from the wiktionary should also be deleted then. VIGNERON (talk) 17:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I really hate using Wiktionary as a source (it is user-generated), but other sources may be not much better. Before importing a source, some discussion in Lexeme project talk page may be required.--GZWDer (talk) 18:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@GZWDer: the best solution, especially for lexemes, is to cross multiple sources (timeo hominem unius libri). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Yeah there are a number of sources in the Internet, but 1. published dictionary often does not contain machine-readable part of speech information and 2. other online database may be not reliable.--GZWDer (talk) 09:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm curious what @SixTwoEight: thinks about their import and a possible deletion suggestion for that. I very recently wrote a best practice about referencing at least one form and the import from SixTwoEight does not seem to follow that (feel free to support, oppose or comment in the page with best practices so we can move forward as a community).--So9q (talk) 10:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

@So9q: Just checked, it looks like my bot imports do have forms but they are unreferenced (see for instance L204117). I do think that it's a good idea to add referenced forms to bot-imported lexemes. I will see if I can add references to those adverbs I imported. (there is the minor issue that the reference should really be for the lexeme, not the form, but since that's not possible referencing a form should be close enough) --SixTwoEight (talk) 00:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch for your reply. :) Do you want help adding references? I made Wikidata:LexUse recently and if I tweak it a little and add Wikisource we could easily add a lot of references semi-automatically. Feel free to discuss in the github repo and open issues.--So9q (talk) 05:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@So9q: Can we close this request now? Bovlb (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

@Bovlb: No. GZWDer added sources to some which is nice :) but these 2700 are still missing a source/reference (other than the bogus one that was imported). IMO sources need to be provided or we should delete them. I am planning to write a tool to check for examples in Wikisource and that could probably help finding references to works where the word is used. A corpora of all Gutenberg English texts would be nice also to look up in if anyone has made that yet. @SixTwoEight, GZWDer: about making a corpora or helping out with a wikisource tool.--So9q (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

@So9q, SixTwoEight, GZWDer: 2 month later, it seems we're still at the same point. Is there anything that can be done and should we delete the 2700 lexemes left? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 07:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

@VIGNERON: I'll try to hack on LexUse/LexUtils and add Wikisource support within a week or two. That could hopefully yield some references/sources. IMO we are not in a rush here really. As a sampling I just did a quick search for https://en.wikisource.org/w/index.php?search=absentminded&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go&ns0=1&ns100=1&ns102=1&ns106=1&ns114=1 for absentminded (L334208) and the third result contains "Prose is poetry without knowing it; it is as if an absentminded poet always said good morning in metre, or asked us to pass the potatoes in impromptu and unconscious rhyme." where it is used as an adjective to the best of my judgement so I added it as an example https://www.wikidata.ryancray.com/w/index.php?title=Lexeme%3AL334208&type=revision&diff=1466113399&oldid=1380621758. Interestingly enough the Q-item for the book was created by GZWDer and had no statements so I improved that a little too.--So9q (talk) 09:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

@VIGNERON, SixTwoEight, GZWDer: LexUtils now has Wikisource support and anyone can start finding usage examples using it. Unfortunately good CC0 sources for English sentences are currently missing. If anyone reading this has ideas for APIs or dumps to use (besides CommonVoice) feel free to open an issue. It currently does not support supplying a SPARQL query on the command line, but if you would like that feature to improve forms from these 2700 lexemes feel free to open an issue.--So9q (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Delete Probably we need to block GZWDer (flood) for a long period of times due to mass abusing on this topic. --00:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC) – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Liuxinyu970226 (talk • contribs).

@So9q, SixTwoEight, GZWDer, VIGNERON: It's been a year now. I don't see a strong consensus to delete. Can we please either close this or somehow reinvigorate the discussion? Bovlb (talk) 00:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Not done Please open a new topic if there are remaining items to be deleted. Bovlb (talk) 20:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Hasya Katta Official

Q108029123 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109730868 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109730915 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q108196748 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Non-notable TV channel/radio station/record label, created for advertisement by User:Knowledgedonor. — Afeef (talk) 16:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Done Mahir256 (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110661059

Q110661059: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110662403

Q110662403: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110659994

Q110659994: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

WD:N. While individual typefaces might be notable (e.g. Arial, Bodoni etc.), this does not seem to be the case here. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 00:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)