Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2024/02/07

Data item created for a page on en.WS that has been deleted. The data item now contains no links nor usable content. --EncycloPetey (talk) 05:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q124366795

Q124366795: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? WT20 (talk) 08:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vcldead

Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vcldead The contributions of these multiple accounts are not significant. I request mass deletion Thank you. WT20 (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Here are the contributions from each account WT20 (talk) 06:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@WT20: Was this supposed to go on RfD? EPIC (talk) 11:44, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@EPIC He want all the items created by these account deleted, since they were blocked by abusing multiple accounts. Fralambert (talk) 12:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@Fralambert Yes WT20 (talk) 12:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Oppose, please see the comments on Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vcldead, these edits were all part of a edit-a-thon. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:51, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Okay, I get it, but does that necessarily mean that the items are not notable? Some of them might be fine to keep, while others can be deleted if they are not notable. EPIC (talk) 12:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC) EPIC (talk) 12:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

If we want people to stay motivated to edit this project we should try our best to expand their items and see if they are notable indeed, not throw them away. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 12:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@EPICYes you are right the ones that are not significant can be deleted in it I have done some separate delete request and it has been deleted. WT20 (talk) 13:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Please reinstate those deleted items and give a chance to the organizers and editors to expand them. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

I think the best would be if someone who understands Dutch can check these items, since most of them are about Dutch bands. I deleted some yesterday where the notability was quite doubtful (low streams/minimal media attention, no Discogs/MusicBrainz entry), but the rest should be checked by someone else. EPIC (talk) 13:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

We can wait for checkuser decision and then work on those items later I think there is some misunderstanding here. WT20 (talk) 13:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Hmmm, don't really think it is necessary - the CU data doesn't have anything to do with if the items are actually notable, and if it is true that they were part of an edit-a-thon, that would explain the similarities. EPIC (talk) 13:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Strong oppose these are *not* multiple accounts of the same person (and even it they were, it is not in itself a valid reason for deletion). Plus, 5000 pages were created in the last 10 years by Denengelse, asking for deletion of these is non-sense. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:00, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Chiming in on behalf of Wikimedia Nederland: the items were indeed created during an edit-a-thon, organised in Rotterdam by User:Denengelse. The event was attended by some 20 people, most of whom first-time editors. There was no sock-puppetry here. Of course notability criteria apply, but in the interest of fairness and encouraging newcomers, I would assume that would be on a case by case basis? I would like to point out that Denengelse has been contributing to Wikidata for years. He is an active advocate for Wikidata in the Dutch GLAM-sector. Nominating his edits for mass deletion does not help build trust in Wikidata. Actually deleting them would cause practical problems for our GLAM partners. Sandra Rientjes - Wikimedia Nederland 09:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

@SRientjes forgot to sign this statement WT20 (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Not done If there are items that are not notable, please make a bulk deletion request listing the affected items. It seems inappropriate to delete all of them if some are notable and some are not. --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q114957957

Q114957957: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Indeterminate item Quesotiotyo (talk) 20:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by EPIC (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q105987959

Q105987959: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:18, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by EPIC (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q124447130

Q124447130: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No wikilink. I forgot to check for wikilinks so I accidentally created one without any. --Writehydra (talk) 04:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by EPIC (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q111366011

Q111366011: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Despite an impressive number of insta followers I don't think they're notable --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by EPIC (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q124438267

Q124438267: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 07:48, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by EPIC (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q124440170

Q124440170: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 07:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by EPIC (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q124444287

Q124444287: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notability guidelines WT20 (talk) 07:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Deleted by EPIC (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q124448834

Kofi Amoah (Q124448834): Computational Biologist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty WT20 (talk) 08:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Keep Has external identifiers which show publications in notable journals.--DrGavinR (talk) 08:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Keep Agree with the above. Multiple external identifiers. I've linked to a couple of journal articles stored in Wikidata Piecesofuk (talk) 09:45, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Not deleted per above. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 12:22, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Q17069807

Q17069807: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Last remains of cross-wiki hoax deleted recently at en-wiki and now finally at ar-wiki (for the fourth time), so item is now empty and useless --TU-nor (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2024 (UTC)