Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Ricordisamoa
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Successful, granted by QuiteUnusual per request at m:SRP.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ricordisamoa (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hello, I would like to propose Ricordisamoa as an admin, because I think, he is a reliable user, who would use the rights. He is the author of some gadgets, and there are frequently things to fix. Also he has often edit-requests at the Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard, so I think it would be an enrichment for Wikidata, if he would be an admin.--CENNOXX (talk) 14:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ricordisamoa agreed this request on his user talk page.
Votes
edit- Support yes, of course --Iste (D) 15:01, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --YMS (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak support (edit conflict) I share CennoxX's thoughts, although he seems quite jumpy to me as the Leemon2001 issue showed. I hope he is going to be a bit calmer with the mop.
:-)
Regards, Vogone talk 15:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]- of course, I wouldn't have blocked or de-rollbackered Leemon2010 without a previous consultation! --Ricordisamoa 15:13, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- P.S.: You don't have to use a Magic Word for
gender
, I won't change sex in the meantime... ;-) --Ricordisamoa 16:03, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --DangSunM (talk) 15:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 15:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – I share concern with Vogone, but I also believe that Ricordi will think carefully on the consequences before making decisions.--Bill william compton (talk) 15:35, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Stevenliuyi (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Rschen7754 16:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I recall noting in Sven's reconfirmation RFA that being excitable/zealous isn't a problem as long as you know when to seek input, since it's the users who really get into an idea that make a project like this thrive. People seemed to feel the same way when they voted to support me for administrator, despite my own occasional habit of getting involved in drama. So, seeing as Ricardi assures us he wouldn't have unilaterally acted on Leemon or anyone in the same situation, I'll take a bold thinker over the alternative. (And, of course, his work here has been simply stunning... I don't know how many admins could survive without some of his scripts.) — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 17:10, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I was awaiting this. — ΛΧΣ21 17:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — Arkanosis ✉ 18:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Of course --ValterVB (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good candidate, I can trust him to use discretion with the tools. Ajraddatz (Talk) 21:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --LlamaAl (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Stryn (talk) 08:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Rzuwig► 20:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Jon Harald Søby (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Thanks for your tool. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 03:33, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Mark91it's my world 17:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support John F. Lewis (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, do not expect any problems.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - No reason to oppose. Ljubinka (discussion) 17:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Érico Wouters msg 20:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No concerns. Shows good knowledge of and commitment to Wikidata. Del♉sion23 (talk) 22:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
edit- ...