Property talk:P1324
Latest comment: 4 years ago by LiberatorG in topic Change protocol constraint to version control system
Documentation
source code repository URL
public source code repository
public source code repository
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Distinct values: this property likely contains a value that is different from all other items. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: libpurple (Q3029225), Pidgin (Q71380), TestDisk (Q928564), PhotoRec (Q2088845), Noto Sans Gurmukhi (Q75868597), Noto Serif Gurmukhi (Q75868601)List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1324#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
Qualifiers “version control system (P8423), web interface software (P10627), operator (P137), together with (P1706), applies to part, aspect, or form (P518), platform (P400), start time (P580), end time (P582), end cause (P1534), has characteristic (P1552), does not have characteristic (P6477), mirrors data from (P3447), publisher (P123), website username or ID (P554), download URL (P4945), earliest date (P1319), latest start date (P8555), earliest end date (P8554), latest date (P1326), retrieved (P813), archive URL (P1065), archive date (P2960), reason for deprecated rank (P2241), reason for preferred rank (P7452), described at URL (P973)”: this property should be used only with the listed qualifiers. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1324#allowed qualifiers, SPARQL
Required qualifier “version control system (P8423)”: this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1324#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
Required qualifier “web interface software (P10627)”: this property should be used with the listed qualifier. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1324#mandatory qualifier, SPARQL
Item “copyright license (P275)”: Items with this property should also have “copyright license (P275)”. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1324#Item P275, SPARQL
Type “software (Q7397), programming language (Q9143), website (Q35127), webcomic (Q213369), repository (Q3133368), Wikimedia module (Q15184295), Wikimedia template (Q11266439), typeface (Q17451), artificial neural network (Q192776), technical specification (Q20819677), technical standard (Q317623), document (Q49848), data set (Q1172284), chemical compound (Q11173)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “software (Q7397), programming language (Q9143), website (Q35127), webcomic (Q213369), repository (Q3133368), Wikimedia module (Q15184295), Wikimedia template (Q11266439), typeface (Q17451), artificial neural network (Q192776), technical specification (Q20819677), technical standard (Q317623), document (Q49848), data set (Q1172284), chemical compound (Q11173)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1324#Type Q7397, Q9143, Q35127, Q213369, Q3133368, Q15184295, Q11266439, Q17451, Q192776, Q20819677, Q317623, Q49848, Q1172284, Q11173, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1324#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as qualifier (Q54828449), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1324#Scope, SPARQL
|
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Discussion
editDead links
editArchive URL is not a valid qualifier. Ogoorcs (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Change protocol constraint to version control system
editThe protocol (P2700) constraint for this property is an unnatural requirement to be made mandatory. It also creates confusion e.g. regarding Git (Q186055) vs Git Wire Protocol (Q53755957).
I propose making this constraint non-mandatory, creating a property for version control system (Q3257930), and adding that as a constraint (also non-mandatory because the source code may only be made available as tarball archives). Thoughts?
Notified participants of WikiProject Informatics/FLOSS --Waldyrious (talk) 09:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Support Using version control system (Q3257930) as a property to specify the version control system (VCS) just makes more sense than using protocol (P2700). I also do not think that we need the protocol qualifier to distinguish between a git clone URL and a git web interface because this is already in the URL as git://andhttps://, respectively. Would it be possible to batch-change protocol to VCS, change Git Wire Protocol (Q53755957) to Git (Q186055) and remove HTTP (Q8777) and HTTPS (Q44484)? —Dexxor (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)- I also somehow Support this suggestion, but I'm also interested in discovering why it was mandatory. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 05:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
- I also somehow
- I also see the issue that it is unclear what the protocol is in this case. I generally prefer not to create more properties for single use cases but if there is no better idea of how to fix this issue. For the "mandatory qualifier constraint" I think we should keep it – for nearly every constraint there will always be a few exceptions, that is why the have the distinction between constraints that are mandatory constraint (Q21502408) and those that aren't. If we don't have this constraint only few people will add the qualifier. The few exceptions are not enough to outweigh the large benefit. -- MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 20:03, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- MichaelSchoenitzer, just to be sure: when you say to keep the mandatory constraint, you mean in the new VCS property, not in the existing protocol one, right? --Waldyrious (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- If there's a new property then yes. I want to avoid having an even larger number of statements without any VCS stated, since the information isn't much worth if you don't know what VCS the link is used for. -- MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 12:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- MichaelSchoenitzer, just to be sure: when you say to keep the mandatory constraint, you mean in the new VCS property, not in the existing protocol one, right? --Waldyrious (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Since there has been agreement for using a VCS property, I've gone ahead and created Wikidata:Property proposal/version control system. Please voice your thoughts there, Dexxor, Valerio Bozzolan and MichaelSchoenitzer. --Waldyrious (talk) 11:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Update: I just came across a related discussion at Talk:Q186055#Git Protocol — pinging User:Konstin, User:Daask and User:LiberatorG to chime in here and in the property discussion at Wikidata:Property proposal/version control system --Waldyrious (talk) 09:43, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Because the current use of the protocol (P2700) qualifier has created confusion, I support the new property. However, in order to make use of the URL it is necessary to know which version control system to use it with, so that is why it is mandatory. For example if the repository URL is from Mercurial (Q476543), it's not going to work with git clonesvn checkout
Update: the new property has been created as version control system (P8423). I'm currently adding it to all the repositories with protocol (P2700) = Git (Q186055) or Git Wire Protocol (Q53755957), using QuickStatements (Q20084080), but perhaps a proper bot would be a more adequate way to migrate all the current values of protocol (P2700). --Waldyrious (talk) 16:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for updating these items! Since each repo only needs to be updated once and not continually, I would expect QuickStatements (Q20084080) to be fine. Can you remove the redundant protocol (P2700) at the same time that you add version control system (P8423)? It shouldn't be a big deal, but the chance of error is reduced if there is less time where the information might be updated between the two changes, and also it would be nice if those that have a software project on their watch list saw those changes together rather than everyone having to review the changes twice. –LiberatorG (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)