Property talk:P9521

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Emu in topic completeness

Documentation

Biology Online Biology Dictionary entry
entry for a term in the Biology Online Biology Dictionary
[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
Single value: this property generally contains a single value. (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303). Known exceptions: mitochondrial DNA (Q27075)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9521#Single value, SPARQL
Format “[a-z0-9]+(-[a-z0-9]+)*: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9521#Format, SPARQL
Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200), Wikibase lexeme (Q51885771): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9521#Entity types
Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P9521#Scope, SPARQL

completeness edit

@UWashPrincipalCataloger: You changed expected completeness (P2429) from eventually complete (Q21873974) to always incomplete (Q21873886). Are there any concepts in the Biology Online Biology Dictionary that aren’t notable per WD:N and as such couldn’t be linked from Wikidata? --Emu (talk) 09:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Emu: There are some entries that are just cross-reference to another term, and I don't think we'd want to include links to those. Also I just assumed that it was unlikely that every term would have an item, but if the idea is that they could, then I have misunderstood what eventually complete means. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 18:03, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@UWashPrincipalCataloger: The cross-references would probably mean that always incomplete (Q21873886) is more accurate. I agree that eventually complete (Q21873974) is ambiguous to say the least – if I understand it correctly, it’s somewhat linked to Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316), but I could be wrong. --Emu (talk) 18:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Return to "P9521" page.