Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/01/04

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q110216410

Spam or non-notable business and its owner entriesHewittjames (talk) 08:14, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted for the three of them. Fralambert (talk) 02:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110314337

Q110314337: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Comeon J (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110316035

Q110316035: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Comeon J (talk) 18:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110401538

Q110401538: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110399995

Q110399995: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110397382

Q110397382: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional Rockpeterson (talk) 18:53, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q107325533

Steven Batash (Q107325533): American gastroenterologist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Comeon J (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Not done Have notable reference, also I liked him to all his scientific publication. Fralambert (talk) 00:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110236386

Q110236386: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Dyekho is back Snackmurat (talk) 22:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110404599

Q110404599: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Errounesly created Sabelöga (talk) 00:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q109286396

Q109286396: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item not needed. Property Property:P10233 has been established for this identifier. UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 00:51, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 02:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q73173641

Protest of Greenpeace with coal in front of the German Chancellery (Q73173641): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Either add sources or delete them. A Wikimedia Commons gallery is not enough for relevance. Gymnicus (talk) 10:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I think every unique (protest) event fits the criteria as "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity". --GPSLeo (talk) 10:48, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@GPSLeo: I do not think so. If you share your assessment, then the school performance in which I played in the fourth grade would also be relevant and thus I would also be relevant via the third point of the relevance criteria. But that is not the case, because this school performance cannot be described with “serious and publicly available references”. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

I think the school performance was not public. For this event there was a pess release[1] and it was mentioned in some news articles. --GPSLeo (talk) 11:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@GPSLeo: That's exactly what I'm saying. If there are reports in the media about the event or demonstration, then the data object can be kept. But these links must also be contained in the data object. As I can see, you as the creator of the data object don't seem to care about the obligation to provide evidence. --Gymnicus (talk) 15:52, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Should I use external data available at URL (P1325) for this? --GPSLeo (talk) 19:06, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@GPSLeo: That or described at URL (P973)! --Gymnicus (talk) 11:53, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Keep Has a Commons category, that should be deleted first if the item is to be deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep Per Mike Peel and GPSLeo.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Not deleted --Lymantria (talk) 07:49, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q107024348

Q107024348: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. The site called Marmara gazetesi is clearly making paid promotion. E4024 (talk) 20:46, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

This RfD worries me for two reasons: First, User:E4024 should have mentioned that it wasn’t their first attempt to get this item deleted, see Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2021/07/19#Q107024348. Second, this is yet another item of User:Megatron34 who already managed to convice User:Mahir256 and User:Taketa to restore this item. This users is trying to get me to restore another item without notability on my talk page. I would suggest to

Delete this item and probably all items by the same user (I haven’t checked them all). --Emu (talk) 21:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not mention the first DR, simply because I had forgotten about it. I DR'ed Coşkun Çetin (Q108001568), for which reason I looked at the other contributions by the same user and saw this one. I cannot understand why these people would be notable. OTOH, maybe like in Commons and WPs we should develop a "deletion request message" gadget and seeing my messages of deletion on a user's talk page I would remember to say it is the second time I am DR'ing an item. (BTW I see that it was deleted the first time.) Sorry again. --E4024 (talk) 22:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Keep I don't get the point of why convincing(?) 2 different admins is not enough for you two. And nobody but you both are trying to delete all my items forcing "they're not notable." I don't know how E4024 is saying Marmara Gazetesi is "clearly" making promotion and also he is requesting a deletion for my another item (Coşkun Çetin) which has many news including national ones. I don't even want to mention that Emu is not answering my questions properly and ignoring me on the talk page. So Emu basically saying User:Mahir256 and User:Taketa did the wrong thing by communicating and understanding me but the user itself doing the right thing by only ignoring me and forcing own truth. I don't know. Also check Coşkun Çetin RfD above. --Megatron34 (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- No, that’s not what I’m saying. Both User:Mahir256 and User:Taketa actually were very skeptical about your restoration request, voiced concerns about the notability and specifically advised you to improve the item “before it is deleted again.” In the end, they apparently gave your item the benefit of the doubt as is standard practice per AGF (assume food faith). But you have a history of trying to get and keep items of questionable notability into Wikidata, so in the end, one might have to question wether this principle should really be the guiding star when in doubt. --Emu (talk) 00:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
  - No. Actually, I was late to add references too many times to my items, so they were not meeting the notability as I mentioned for both. I created items without adding references so Mahir deleted it. I told Mahir that I'll add soon but one or two day(s) after Taketa deleted it again for the same reason. Then he restored the item so I finally added references before it got deleted again. This was what happened exactly. --Megatron34 (talk) 02:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
    - And, as you can see I added his Linkedin profile to my item on May 29. E4024 requested deletion by the statement "I see one person with this name (https://tr.linkedin.com/in/fatih-kaba-87b0a7109) who is a graduate of another university -that may be a mistake- and does not look like notable." on July 18. The statement looks weird to me. Because two Linkedin profiles are obviously not the same. Check it out. --Megatron34 (talk) 02:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
      - Addition to that misdirecting statement of the user, you can just google "fatih kaba" and see him on the first page or on the first page of Google News. It seems like it's not that hard to confuse different "fatih kaba"s Linkedin accounts. So confused... --Megatron34 (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
When I make the said search in Google I only see self bragging in self-created pages; if I make the search in "news" what I see mostly is news about "Afşin İlçe Milli Eğitim Müdürü Fatih Kaba", who is a local bureaucrat. Maybe you wanted to make an item for the public servant and got confused? Please tell us, if it's not what I just said, what was the reason that inspired you to make the item of the person who does not appear at the news searches (but at IMDb, Linkedin etc) and preferred him to the more notable Fatih Kaba? I really wonder. E4024 (talk) 23:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Delete Not Noteworthy. Advertising, Sysop This Person Shows Himself As A Business Person By Doing Pr Work. Very Few References For Wikidata. I certainly don't think it's noteworthy.The references she shared are not secure. Pospaw (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q107024554

Q107024554: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, spam, Advertising Comeon J (talk) 05:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Problems around this name: One of the sources used on the item is the newssite where he works. (Not an independent source.) It describes the person (BTW as a Turkish citizen and quite a reader I never heard his name before) twice! as "successful journalist" in the first ever sentence!!! Plus: "Mesleğinde ilkeli çizgisini koruyan ve gazeteciliği yeni nesil ihtiyaçlara entegre ederek icra eden Gazeteci Olgun Kızıltepe hakkında detaylı araştırmalar yapılıyor." (sic) This is not journalism. I confess I have used this site on items of other people here in WD and in WPs. I believe we should not use this site for items of the "personnel" of the same site. This much from me because I do not want my talk page to be filled with unwanted talk. --E4024 (talk) 14:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep No, it's not spam or advert. I never heard his name too until I saw him on a news site but he's truly a journalist according to his news site profile. I'd never say "this is not writing" if I don't approve a writer's book or any publication. If it sits there and people reading it, the writer is a writer as a datum. WD:N says items should be described with serious sources which are not self-generated because they're promotional. The news website haberler.com is a serious source that no one can edit or self-generate such a profile. So I added this site source to prove that he is a journalist, not to promote his profile or his journalism. This profile link alone is enough to prove his identity as a journalist. So we can't say "let's delete this because someone didn't approve him as a journalist." You can share and discuss your opinions about journalism, or entities' fame on other platforms. As I read, Wikidata is not a blog site and is not built for these opinions. I'm open to discussions about the topics outside of Wikidata by the way. Just hit me up on my talk page, we can discuss everything forever including "if Olgun's journalism is journalism or not." I'd also never make a fight against news sources like haberler.com or Marmara gazetesi which you mentioned above on another RfD that you requested. Because you can easily find that New York Times is also making paid promotions too, including articles and storytelling. Don't we include NYT in WD items and WP articles? Let's work around data (the information) I guess. --Megatron34 (talk) 23:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

"I saw him on a news site". Hmmm. This reminds me of the famous "Bir gün bir kitap okudum ve bütün hayatım değişti" (One day I read a book and all my life changed) in Yeni Hayat (The New Life) of Orhan Pamuk. Pamuk inspired the title from Ziya Gökalp's homonymous book and wrote his own as a novel. I wonder why you were suddenly attracted to the idea of making an item for an unknown journalist... Look, if you are "him" say it and it will be understandable, how many of us did not write his/her name on wet cement when we were kids... E4024 (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Delete. The Person Is Not Significant.

Just because they have news doesn't mean it's significant, and that person made these stories by giving money to PR sites. Pospaw (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:00, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q104155681

Q104155681: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Privacy violation; 4-year-old child who is not a public figure Iamthecheese44 (talk) 03:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Keep There are dozens of photos found in Google image search and several news articles and interviews mentioning the children. I could see if the family requested removal. We have entries for every child from noble and royal families. --RAN (talk) 06:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
What throne is she eligible to succeed to? --- Jura 19:57, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Delete minor. Use number of children (P1971) instead. --- Jura 14:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Delete Not notable. Not described by serious sources. Does not fulfil structural need since number of children (P1971) exists. Also WD:LP. SilentSpike (talk) 13:01, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Keep Not a privacy issue because it's already covered by references. If news coverage and other sources only informed that "Natalie Portman has had a child", it could be argued that number of children would be enough, but even headlines give the name of the child.--Pere prlpz (talk) 16:32, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q109675135

Q109675135: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

(self)promotion for SEO, none of the identifiers imply notability Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q108864928

Q108864928: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertisement no ref found anywhere. --Aroojakhan (talk) 11:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Comment Was deleted as Q103839062 recently. See Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2021/07/18#Q103839062. --- Jura 20:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:50, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q109743503

Q109743503: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Comeon J (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q109698453

Q109698453: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Comeon J (talk) 18:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110397002

Q110397002: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q107641777

Q107641777: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Comeon J (talk) 19:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q7645320

Suraj (Q7645320): 1997 film by T L V Prasad: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not Notable Comeon J (talk) 20:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Not done per WD:N #1: this item has three valid sitelinks to enwiki, hiwiki and newwiki. --Ameisenigel (talk) 16:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q108401426

Q108401426: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax Bluemask (talk) 04:32, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110401525

Q110401525: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks, appears to be self-promo spam firefly ( t · c ) 11:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110408714

Q110408714: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by an LTA (see per request (Benjamin105)). Steward request. [₂₄Cr][talk] 11:54, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q110285641

Q110285641: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by an LTA. See request (Benjamin105). Steward request. [₂₄Cr][talk] 11:55, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Q8461094

Category:Flamenco styles (Q8461094): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplication of Q6291127. I tried using the Special:MergeItems tool but there was parameter conflict. I have manually migrated all the parameters to Q6291127 and now Q110285641 is totally empty. Please delete it. --El Mono Español (talk) 14:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)