Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/08/07

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q105816235

Q105816235: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no discernible notability Gymnicus (talk) 08:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Keep AntisocialRya n (Talk) 20:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q105817194

Q105817194: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no discernible notability Gymnicus (talk) 08:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 8 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q111961239

Q111961239: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a valid reason for deprecation Swpb (talk) 14:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Why not? It it is just a more specific version of the reasons it is derived from, like identifier not suited for this item. The use case for it here was also based on widely known public reference material. In order for an identifier to be used for an item, it needs to be considered valid by reputable secondary sources. The example I first used this reason on is not considered valid by sources on the topic. (The SIL, who came up with the "jnj" code for the Yem language, is a Christian missionary organization, not a legitimate scholarly body.) --Middle river exports (talk) 16:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Middle river exports: Can you please give us the precise example where you used this?Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 06:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q110915798

Q110915798: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable; identifiers show no publications nor much of anything else Jamie7687 (talk) 14:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q101228874

Q101228874: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, PR. Kadı (talk) 20:57, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Delete – Alle enthaltenen Identifikatoren erzeugen keine Relevanz, somit kann das Datenobjekt schon nicht über Punkt 2 der Notabilitätskriterien relevant sein. Auch den ersten und den dritten Punkt der Notabilitätskriterien erfüllt das Datenobjekt. Somit kann das Datenobjekt nur gelöscht werden. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q108611374

Q108611374: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Delete – Im aktuellen Zustand ist das Datenobjekt klar nicht notabel. Deswegen verwundert mich, warum es nicht schon längst gelöscht wurde. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q99578516

Q99578516: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Delete – Alle enthaltenen Identifikatoren erzeugen keine Relevanz, somit kann das Datenobjekt schon nicht über Punkt 2 der Notabilitätskriterien relevant sein. Auch den ersten und den dritten Punkt der Notabilitätskriterien erfüllt das Datenobjekt. Somit kann das Datenobjekt nur gelöscht werden. --Gymnicus (talk) 11:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q98908281

Q98908281: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:58, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q99826742

Q99826742: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 21:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

This Turkish user is requesting deletion for all my items. Be aware and cautious there's not enough time frame between deletion requests to be able to do research about items if they're notable or not. Potential spam/personal issue. Also check this Wikipedia Deletion Request which he made a few days ago for my article. Clearly notable, not PR. Good try Kadı, not today ser :) Palaangelino (talk) 04:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q62027762

Qixxit (Q62027762): Travel booking application, website: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Pr. Kadı (talk) 20:23, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

~~{{Deleted}} --DeltaBot (talk) 20:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)~~

I reverted my deletion as someone made me remember that I keeped it a another time. Probably a another admin should check for it. --Fralambert (talk) 21:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

On July 12, 2021 and August 4, 2021 the data object was retained by Fralambert and Emu. --MKBler (talk) 22:05, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

On the topic itself, shouldn't the relevance come from the fact that the previous owner and operator of this app was Deutsche Bahn? --MKBler (talk) 22:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

@MKBler Not necessarily, DB doesn’t have the Midas touch that creates notability out of thin air (others do). But the WIWO and Connect articles should be enough for WD:N #2 notability. --Emu (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

@Emu: But there is the third point of the criteria of relevance. It says that a data object can become relevant if - let's call it - it is an added value for another relevant data object. In practice this means that when the relevant data object links to the affected data object. In this case, this would be possible from the data object of Deutsche Bahn to the data object of Qixxit using the property owner of (P1830). This statement can also be substantiated by the above-mentioned news articles. So the added value point should be fulfilled here, shouldn't it? --MKBler (talk) 09:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

@MKBler Hm, I’m not sure if owning something makes the owned thing notable. But this is a moot point anyway in this case – there is WD:N #2 notability in this case, as I saw it and continue to see it. --Emu (talk) 09:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

@Emu: Yes, I understand the objection. But this third point is also quite broad, I think. When does the third point generate relevance and when does it not? I think there's a lot of room for interpretation there. But as you say, in this case it's just a side job. The owner of Deutsche Bahn's relationship with Qixxit only shows that the data object is relevant in addition to the already existing sources. --MKBler (talk) 09:47, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Not done no new info --Emu (talk) 22:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Q25708137

Q25708137: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Dexbot (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Q67578939 + Q108259252

Q67578939: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q108259252: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Seems not to be notable: repeatedly deleted on cswiki as non-notable; the subject himself repeatedly comes, changes all pseudonyms, etc. (see history). The deletion would probably be the best for everybody. Mormegil (talk) 15:07, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Delete Q67578939. All the photos of the self-proclaimed singer Dalibor Hřebíček (Q67578939) has been deleted (self promotion). The Category:Dalibor Hřebíček is empty. --Nemracc (talk) 22:37, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

PS: On https://cs.wikipedia.org/ the article has already been deleted 4 times. The Category on Commons has been deleted.--Nemracc (talk) 13:21, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

+ Q113024923: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs): newly created item for a sister of the subject, already deleted before (mass-deleted with other relatives by User:Matěj Suchánek). --Mormegil (talk) 08:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Q112898392

Q112898392: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable, pure self-promotion Gymnicus (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

{{not done}}, has image on Commons, please get that deleted first. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mike Peel: The image has been suggested for quick deletion, pending a decision on Wikimedia Commons, the decision can wait here at Wikidata. --Gymnicus (talk) 20:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

In addition: there is no need to have images deleted first, an image does not create notability. Lymantria (talk) 06:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --Lymantria (talk) 07:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Q113459345

Q113459345: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Lectrician1 (talk) 23:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Q111437354

Dobromiła Jaskot (Q111437354): Polish composer and pianist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-advertisement. Maintained by user of the same name. Identifiers all messed up too. AntisocialRya n (Talk) 17:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Removed the faulty identifiers because they were putting warnings on other pages. AntisocialRya n (Talk) 17:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Not done per external identifiers --Emu (talk) 17:39, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Q106559936

Q106559936: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I do not want and never requested my name and personal data to appear on wikidata. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.69.139.32 (talk • contribs).

We do not need your permission to have an item for you here, but this item does not appear to pass our notability criteria. CC @Alain Schneider as original author. Bovlb (talk) 20:17, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

I had added this item while working on the list of INALCO people from the website. No personal data but only professional data already published online Alain Schneider (talk) 07:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Keep if sources are added, delete otherwise. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Q108196939

Q108196939: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks notability --2A04:CEC0:107A:6181:DD59:40AA:183D:E0EE 19:40, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Keep Just because you blanked the item. Fralambert (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Since they continued their blanking I semiprotected this item. Fralambert (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:20, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

That said, despite her notable sister, I don't believe that this individual meets Wikidata criteria for inclusion. DS (talk) 15:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Keep Notable doesn't mean famous, just being able to be described by a reliable source. --RAN (talk) 14:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)