Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/09/03
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Q113663035: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self-promotion/advertising, does not meet the notability policy. Nothing link here. HarryNº2 (talk) 16:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by AmaryllisGardener (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113624499: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self-promo, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by AmaryllisGardener (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113628494: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 19:23, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by AmaryllisGardener (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113633833: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 21:50, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113612104: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, cross-wiki promo spam JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 22:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by AmaryllisGardener (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113612768: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, cross-wiki promo spam JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by AmaryllisGardener (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
John Tribe (Q108571274): professor of tourism: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Created by LTA --Ilovemydoodle (talk) 22:53, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Not deleted Have a sitelink, also seem notable according this [1] Fralambert (talk) 23:18, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113682137: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No indication of notability; seems like spam promotion Bovlb (talk) 00:56, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 02:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113635191: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113634713: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:13, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 02:20, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
claim for restitution of an artwork (Q107614552): legal complaint: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
- claim of restitution 1. would not be a complaint bit a lawsuit
- and it is not notable because there is no need to use another subject than a lawsuit
- no sitelinks
- wrong using of property depicted by (P1299)
WD:N --Oursana (talk) 04:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- The links were all created by the creator of this subject about 6 month ago
- see a famous legal law firm about restitution claim, we do not need a special claim for artwork https://www.allenovery.com/en-gb/global/news-and-insights/publications/restitution-claims--getting-your-own-back
- https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?search=restitution+claim&search=restitution+claim&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Seite&ns0=1&ns120=1
- claiming looted art regularly is following the Q17354266 outside the courts.
- with all respect the whole complex is kind of spammed by one user. There is no controle by other users and there are many mistakes
- we have already Q873642, Q2146005 with sitelinks which should be sufficient
--Oursana (talk) 04:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Delete. This is a particular kind of claim that in effect is a claim for conversion enabled by specific legislation. There's no good reason why this ought to be its own article. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 00:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Keep It is needed as a topic to connect the articles we host where someone is claiming that they own an artwork now in another person's collection. --RAN (talk) 00:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ari T. Benchaim@Oursana@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) very specific RFD. If there is no more input, we probably should keep the item Estopedist1 (talk) 04:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Not deleted Estopedist1 (talk) 07:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Ari T. Benchaim@Oursana@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) very specific RFD. If there is no more input, we probably should keep the item Estopedist1 (talk) 04:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Q11631101: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
The entry is pointless and doesn't serve a purpose. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment It's a Wikimedia Commons Category for Designed postmarks called commemorative stamps used at Japanese post offices. A bot generated item. This could be further liked to the related items. It's not harmful to keep it, plus there is need of someone who connect it to related items. That's my opinion. - BeLucky (talk) 06:55, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- I might be wrong, but as far as I know a Wikidata entry can't be circular to be notable. If all it links to is itself/other Wikiprojects then I'd call that pointless and not worth keeping. That said, someone might be able to find a source discussing the topic and use it as a reference somehow. I looked but couldn't find any. Although admittedly I didn't do a super in-depth search. I actually have a book on the topic, but it's 99% pictures and I can't read Japanese. So I don't think it would be any help. Adamant1 (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Commons category doesn't make it notable/being in WD scope. Identifier (Google Knowledge Graph ID) is incorrect. Wikidata has no other items called "commemorative postmarks of Foo country" Estopedist1 (talk) 05:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- I might be wrong, but as far as I know a Wikidata entry can't be circular to be notable. If all it links to is itself/other Wikiprojects then I'd call that pointless and not worth keeping. That said, someone might be able to find a source discussing the topic and use it as a reference somehow. I looked but couldn't find any. Although admittedly I didn't do a super in-depth search. I actually have a book on the topic, but it's 99% pictures and I can't read Japanese. So I don't think it would be any help. Adamant1 (talk) 21:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Lotte Belice Baltussen (Q110527696): Wikimedia Nederlands board member 2020-2022: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
- Personally created for someone non-encyclopedic. HarryNº2 (talk) 02:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed, does not appear notable. However, the Commons category needs to go first, I think. I'm not entirely sure what the process is for that. I've nominated the image for deletion, anyway. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- The Commons category don't have to go first. As I understand WD:N that means a only Commons category item needs to respect the criterion #2 or #3, which this item clearly don't. Fralambert (talk) 03:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, I think I misread that. Thank you. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- The Commons category don't have to go first. As I understand WD:N that means a only Commons category item needs to respect the criterion #2 or #3, which this item clearly don't. Fralambert (talk) 03:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- 'encyclopedic' isn't a relevant criterion here since Wikidata isn't an encyclopedia. I'm neutral on deletion, but I'll note that Commons and Wikidata should be considered separately; the image is fine according to Commons' rules because each user gets a few images to use for their user page. The category can stay or go, however. Arlo Barnes (talk) 04:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Info Commons category deleted --Emu (talk) 10:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep She is maybe notable, as I see in her ResearchGate profile [2]. Also in the Board of Trustees of Wikimedia Netherland[3]. Fralambert (talk) 13:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Oppose has Commons category, seems notable, particularly given publications. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Neutral Commons category, and being a member of Board of Trustees of Wikimedia Netherland don't make her notable for WD. If she hasn't published any scientific articles, I rather tend to deleting. Notifying also the item creator user:Vysotsky. I also notified herself at nl:Overleg gebruiker:Lottebelice--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:30, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping, Estopedist1. I wasn't aware that there was a Wikidata-item about me, and I will leave it up to the community to decide about the notability. --Lottebelice (talk) 08:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Not deleted Estopedist1 (talk) 07:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113622879: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Promo, not notable, resubmission of an already-deleted item JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113622879: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Probably delete. No serious identifiers (best Spotify artist ID), but best Google hit I can find is https://web.archive.org/web/20220826113537/https://awjnews24.com/Interview/jfrotanlife/ Estopedist1 (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Probably
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113579038: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Promo, not notable, recreation of recently deleted item JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 01:44, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- "memenachten" is notable, I found his person in some articles: - https://www.watson.de/unterhaltung/tv/424665229-gntm-finale-heidi-klum-hat-eindeutige-botschaft-an-ihre-kritiker - https://gamingnewstime.de/neuer-freund-bibisbeautypalace-aeussert-sich-zur-trennung-von-julienco/ - in googles knowledge graph as well: https://g.co/kgs/4Hwu7c - in fandom: https://youtube.fandom.com/de/wiki/Memenachten and in official tv and podcast show on imdb:https://www.imdb.com/name/nm13800265/?ref_=tt_cl_t_8 Neyahs (talk) 00:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- The watson article simply quotes a couple random tweets related to the topic (quite common in this style of reporting) and does not actually mention memenachten in the text. Google Knowledge Graph is intentionally broad and not a source of notability. That Fandom wiki documents countless YouTubers that lack notability.
- As for IMDb... Two of the entries there are YouTube videos in which memenachten does not actually appear per their descriptions and credits.[4][5] It also lists him as a contestant on the TV show 'Das große Promi-Büßen', but the official list from the TV station does not[6] and neither does the quite detailed dewiki article de:Das große Promi-Büßen. The podcast linked there also does not involve him.[7] I could go on, but overall, the IMDb profile seems highly unreliable at best if not outright spam/vandalism. Either way, it does not establish notability since it's ultimately a user-built database.
- This leaves the GamingNewsTime article, which is the only one of your links which might have a little bit of value as it actually mentions memenachten directly. However, it is not a serious source but a random blog, itself with no notability as far as I can tell.
- –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 03:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113587882: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Along with their parents: Q113596335 and Q113599632. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q107001192: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Förbätterlig (talk) 12:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Not deleted @Förbätterlig: has identifiers, including Libris-URI (P5587) (Swedish National Library) Estopedist1 (talk) 07:45, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete @Estopedist1: Yes, I know. I created this item, but have since found that the subject is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Libris-URI (P5587) does not necessarily mean that the subject in question is notable, just that the person is somehow connected to one or more publications of any kind in one or more library catalogues connected to Libris. The other identifiers are there solely because of Libris-URI (P5587) or its predecessor SELIBR ID (P906). (I am a Swedish librarian.) Förbätterlig (talk) 09:01, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Förbätterlig if a person has entry in a national library database, I guess it is automatically notable. Or is this Swedish National Library database somewhat marginal? Maybe user:JustAnotherArchivist want to comment? Estopedist1 (talk) 09:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1: The catalogue itself is not marginal, but a majority of the catalogued items are. Libris is not the central catalogue of the national library, but a compilation of many library catalogues, mostly university libraries, but also a number of others, including small, subsidiary libraries. Additionally, publishers are legally obliged to submit all of their books etc to a number of libraries, all of which are connected to Libris. This will lead to them being registrered in Libris, possibly along with their authors. An entry in Libris does not mean that the person is automatically notable. Förbätterlig (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Förbätterlig: Hmm, tricky. I agree that presence in a database does not automatically imply notability in the general case. Especially in the case of libraries' (or related) databases, they're often intentionally broad and thus include many subjects that may not really be notable. I'm not surprised to hear this is the case for this one as well.
- A web search on her didn't bring up an overwhelming amount. There are publications of a couple essays between 2010 and 2012 in CORE though: [8]. She is also mentioned in the announcements of a few cultural events in Sweden: [9][10][11]. That might be sufficient to meet the notability criteria here on WD (even if she's probably not eligible for a wiki article).
- –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 10:17, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @JustAnotherArchivist: Those are student essays and non-notable sources. (I.e. events that anyone may participate in, and so not a basis for notability. They both took place not very far from where I live.) I understand that the criteria are more inclusive on Wikidata for a number of reasons, but I assumed that a completely isolated item, whose notability is debatable at best, should be deleted. It seems like clutter to me. Förbätterlig (talk) 10:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Estopedist1: The catalogue itself is not marginal, but a majority of the catalogued items are. Libris is not the central catalogue of the national library, but a compilation of many library catalogues, mostly university libraries, but also a number of others, including small, subsidiary libraries. Additionally, publishers are legally obliged to submit all of their books etc to a number of libraries, all of which are connected to Libris. This will lead to them being registrered in Libris, possibly along with their authors. An entry in Libris does not mean that the person is automatically notable. Förbätterlig (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Förbätterlig if a person has entry in a national library database, I guess it is automatically notable. Or is this Swedish National Library database somewhat marginal? Maybe user:JustAnotherArchivist want to comment? Estopedist1 (talk) 09:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Jemal Thompson (Q6177072): Player of American and Canadian football: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)
Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jemal_Thompson, this is likely a hoax Mackensen (talk) 23:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Sitelinks need to be deleted first --Ameisenigel (talk) 09:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Not deleted has sitelinks Estopedist1 (talk) 07:48, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113587882: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- no notability discernible. The two links to this data object are from its parents, which are also not notable and should be deleted. Delete --Gymnicus (talk) 20:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Duplicate nomination, by the way. The other one is a bit up the page. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 23:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113569359: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113571405: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam (attempted self-promo) JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113576314: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam, apparent mistake while trying to add a sitelink to another item from the user's contributions JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113577164: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Promo spam, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113578275: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unable to find any notable person that matches this item JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113579011: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Promo spam, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113579097: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Promo spam, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113579862: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, cannot find anything on a poet with this name JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Mohammad Halim Yarqin (Q113579896): Afghan poet: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, cannot find anything on a poet with this name JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 00:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q109479986: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non notable, self promo --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q108582002: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Cross-wiki spam/promotion using multiple accounts. Marbletan (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q112110669: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Cross-wiki spam/promotion using multiple accounts. Marbletan (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113629246: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Can't find anything significant, Delete –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 03:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Can't find reliable sources, and given creator's username this is probably either self-promotion or impersonation. Jamie7687 (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q108273178: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self-promotion/advertising, does not meet the notability policy. Nothing link here. HarryNº2 (talk) 23:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q110609959: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Trivialist (talk) 23:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113629254: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Personal item by non-notable user Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q104501457: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. An apparent attempt at d:Q180711 ⚊⚊ DCflyer (talk) 21:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q61718104: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. ⚊⚊ DCflyer (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113650720: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non notable person - endless attempt to use various wikimedia sites for self promtion (many blocked accounts) see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mghghoffic/Archive KylieTastic (talk) 21:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q108884814: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Appears non-notable and promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Linking item is Q112962251; Spotify and Google links in the item aren't working for me, and I don't see evidence of many people actually listening to said podcast Jamie7687 (talk) 14:26, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113674822: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. — Afeef (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113676755: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self-promotion / vandalism Madamebiblio (talk) 01:51, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113458506: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Doesn't seem to be notable (very few data but a search on the label gives no meaningful results) VIGNERON (talk) 12:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113635012: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Cross-wiki promo spam, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113635104: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113682256: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Appears non-notable and promotional; re-creation of deleted item Q113655959 Jamie7687 (talk) 02:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113636001: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113636500: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113637293: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unidentifiable spam by anonymous user JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113638027: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Repeated cross-wiki spam, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:42, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113638800: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 04:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113678355: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No person in Wikidata with this name. No references. Nothing link here. HarryNº2 (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113671090: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self-promo, not notable JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 05:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113640633: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 05:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113641236: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam (why do people keep mistaking the item submission form for a search engine?) JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 05:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113640620: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 05:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113642719: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam. There is no airport in or near Nukunonu, nor anything named 'Aeropuerto Nukunonu'. It has also been spammed on a page in this wiki about 'Fictional Airlines'... JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 06:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113687584: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails notability Rockpeterson (talk) 18:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113687355: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not satisfy structural need Rockpeterson (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113686074: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self promotion Rockpeterson (talk) 18:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113683983: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails WD:N Rockpeterson (talk) 18:05, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113682737: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q113682831: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Växjö domkyrkoförsamling (Q33880631): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate of another item, but a merger would be pointless, since the data in this item is inaccurate and should not be transferred there. Förbätterlig (talk) 19:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Not deleted Merged. I don't see any inaccuracies, but please correct any I missed. We're not going to delete a valid five-year-old item when it ought to be merged. Bovlb (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113688105: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable person Guerillero | Talk 20:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Discussion is still open for Q113688100: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) Bovlb (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113688174: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Nonsense page from apparent troll Tagishsimon (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113688178: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Nonsense page from apparent troll Tagishsimon (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Q113688170: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Nonsense page from apparent troll Tagishsimon (talk) 21:57, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)