Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2022/11/07
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Survey (Q16127293): Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
There is another similar one (here). --البراء صالح (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by User:Wd-Ryan, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q114067614: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? Trade (talk) 22:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- Item’s creator is notified. If no serious sources will be given, then after seven days the item will be deleted. Along with
- Estopedist1 (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q114178837: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? Trade (talk) 18:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete some sources have been given, but hardly the serious ones. However some Turkish user may find something better Estopedist1 (talk) 07:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)- Deleted by Estopedist1 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q97477813: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable Wikimedia category -Animalparty (talk) 00:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Keep The Commons category has over 150 items. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 01:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- are commons categories notable? BrokenSegue (talk) 04:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm, not by theirself, according to Wikidata:Notability. I'm not sure what we do about large categories, it seems useful to have on here. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 15:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- If I upload 3 dozen images of my big toe, and make a category for it, does my big toe get to have its own item? If we gaze hard enough into our own navels, do our navels become notable? -Animalparty (talk) 23:52, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Yes, but they shouldn’t be. --Emu (talk) 22:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm, not by theirself, according to Wikidata:Notability. I'm not sure what we do about large categories, it seems useful to have on here. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 15:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- are commons categories notable? BrokenSegue (talk) 04:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Gymnicus (talk) 22:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Estopedist1 (talk) 08:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete --Emu (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q115042339: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. — Haseeb (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Q107473875: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. — Haseeb (talk) 17:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Q106520451: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. — Haseeb (talk) 04:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Q114568357: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Q114575108: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 15:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Listenburg (Q115103554): fictional country and Internet meme: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Vandalism. Delete when the hawiki sitelink will be deleted. I don't think it should be merged with Q114985162. Fralambert (talk) 19:47, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:HakanIST, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q114600741: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable promotional item. Kacamata (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Q115110619: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty, my bad Syrio posso aiutare? 21:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Q98871890: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --TheSwamphen (talk) 23:04, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Q115056744: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? Trade (talk) 23:46, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Q110859565: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. — Haseeb (talk) 04:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q97228414: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Original article deleted. Balajijagadesh (talk) 06:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q115099225: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517): statue in Breda, Netherlands: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This is not a statue of King William III of the Netherlands (19th century), but of King William III of England (17th century) who was also stadholder of Holland and several other provinces of the Netherlands. Q2183129 is the correct Wikidata item for this statue. --JopkeB (talk) 03:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- @JopkeB Rijksmonument ID (P359) 519013 suggests otherwise. Probably notable even if wrong. --Emu (talk) 11:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Emu, The text of Rijksmonumentnummer 519013 says: "RUITERSTANDBEELD van koning-stadhouder Willem III (1650-1702) op sokkel uit 1921." In English: "Equestrian STATUE of King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) on a pedestal from 1921." King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) is the same as King William III of England, who is not the same as King William III of the Netherlands. So in my opinion this statue is for King William III of England, not for King William III of the Netherlands. What do you think it suggests? --JopkeB (talk) 15:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- @JopkeB I suggest that there is a monument for “Koning Willem III”. Where on Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) does it say which William III is depicted on this statue and why would it matter anyway?
- But I guess this isn’t productive, so another question: Do you suggest that Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) and Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) refer to the same object? It seems so to me, but I’m not an expert on statues in the Netherlands, I just looked at the pictures and the coordinate location. If so, the two items should be merged, not one of them deleted. --Emu (talk) 16:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Emu There are only several busts of “Koning Willem III” of the Netherlands (none of them has a Commons category, nor a Wikipedia article), I cannot find any statue or other grand monument for him. He was not a popular person and I guess that is the reason he did not get one.
- Yes, both items refer to the same object, the photos are from the same statue and the adresses are the same, but their descriptions differ. The description of Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is wrong. Equestrian statue of William III (Q2183129) is the correct one and has the correct links to Wikipedia and Commons, I would like to keep this one. In my opinion Equestrian statue of William III (Q17595517) is redundant and can be deleted. But I am not familiar with the proper action in such cases on Wikidata, so I leave it up to you to merge or delete. --JopkeB (talk) 03:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- @JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! --Emu (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks @Emu, the item is in order now! JopkeB (talk) 04:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- @JopkeB Okay, I see. We generally don’t delete duplicates so I merged the two items. Please check if the item is in order now! --Emu (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Emu, The text of Rijksmonumentnummer 519013 says: "RUITERSTANDBEELD van koning-stadhouder Willem III (1650-1702) op sokkel uit 1921." In English: "Equestrian STATUE of King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) on a pedestal from 1921." King-Stadtholder Willem III (1650-1702) is the same as King William III of England, who is not the same as King William III of the Netherlands. So in my opinion this statue is for King William III of England, not for King William III of the Netherlands. What do you think it suggests? --JopkeB (talk) 15:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Emu, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q115106123: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicado con Mikel Garciandía Hard (talk) 16:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
If this is a duplicate, you can merge them yourself, see Help:Merge. Mvolz (talk) 16:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q106520428: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. — Haseeb (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q112815378: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
WD:N Skazi 18:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q112578632: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
WD:N Skazi 19:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted by Ymblanter (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Q40377699: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This item does not achieve noticeability. A person is only trying to promote himself, and his articles on Wikipedia have already been deleted because they are in violation Osps7 (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2022 (UTC)