Property talk:P574

Active discussions

Documentation

year of taxon publication
year when this taxon was formally described (for animals); year when this taxon name was formally established (for plants)
Descriptionpublication date of this scientific name
Data typePoint in time
Domain
According to this template: taxon
According to statements in the property:
taxon (Q16521)
When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values ≤ 𝓧 ≤ unknown
Examplelion (Q140)
Robot and gadget jobsDeltaBot does the following jobs:
Tracking: usageCategory:Pages using Wikidata property P574 (Q26698286)
Lists
  • Items with novalue claims
  • Items with unknown value claims
  • Usage history
  • Future dates
  • Dates in Gregorian calendar before 1582
  • Dates before year 1 (Help:Dates#Years BC)
  • Database reports/Constraint violations/P574
  • Proposal discussionProposal discussion
    Current uses
    Total889,588
    Main statement4<0.1% of uses
    Qualifier889,544>99.9% of uses
    Reference40<0.1% of uses
    [create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]
     
    Scope is as qualifier (Q54828449): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
    List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#scope, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
     
    Range from “+1753-00-00T00:00:00Z” to “now”: values should be in the range from “+1753-00-00T00:00:00Z” to “now”. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
    List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Range, SPARQL (new)
     
    Type “taxon (Q16521): element must contain property “instance of (P31)” with classes “taxon (Q16521)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
    List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#type Q16521, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
     
    Item “taxon name (P225): Items with this property should also have “taxon name (P225)”. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
    List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Item P225, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
     
    Item “parent taxon (P171): Items with this property should also have “parent taxon (P171)”. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
    List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Item P171, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)
     
    Item “taxon rank (P105): Items with this property should also have “taxon rank (P105)”. (Help)
    Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist.
    List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Constraint violations/P574#Item P105, SPARQL, SPARQL (new)


     
    This property is being used by:

    Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

    deEdit

    All languages contains "describing" in label and/or description except de. Are you sure that you will not do wrong statements with that? Infovarius (talk) 16:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

    The taxon name Cactus ficus-indica was first published in 1753. 1768 it got the new taxon name Opuntia ficus-indica. The english description „publication date of the first scientific description“ is clearly misleading. --Succu (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
    Date when taxon was discovered (de: veröffentlicht, isn't it?) isn't appropriate at all in these cases. Infovarius (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
    No. There could be a great gap between the discovery of a taxon and it's first (valid) published description. A new combination, a name at new rank, or replacement name for a taxon has its own publishing date and is not the first scientific description. --Succu (talk) 18:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
    So I'm confused about real meaning of this property. Can you put clear and equal meanings in de and en descriptions please? Infovarius (talk) 05:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
    And almost surely, it was first described well before 1753. It is all about the publication date. - Brya (talk) 10:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
    Sure, see Hortus Cliffortianus. --Succu (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
    Yes, and that is only the first description by Linnaeus! He there refers to three earlier descriptions ... - Brya (talk) 16:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

    oneof-constraintEdit

    the oneof-constraint is for items, not for dates. i removed it. --Akkakk 18:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

    Publication date and date of publicationEdit

    As there is P577 "date of publication" the name "publication date" is misleading. I changed to "date of taxon name publication" to match the other properties that have "data of ...". Andrea Shan (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

    Return to "P574" page.