Wikidata:Bot requests/Archive/2022/05

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Request to change Property:P106 = Q34074720 to Property:P106 = Q28692502 (2022-04-25)

Request date: 26 April 2022, by: Emu

Task description

At the moment, there are 1981 intances of occupation (P106)feminist (Q34074720). Because feminist (Q34074720) hasn’t the correct instance of (P31), all those throw value-type constraint violations. To avoid this, a bot should replace them with occupation (P106)women's rights activist (Q28692502). Thanks!

Discussion: Hi Emu! I've gotten this done. :) See edits at: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/PangolinBot PangolinMexico (talk) 11:49, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Request process

Accepted by (PangolinMexico (talk) 28 April 2022 13ː27 UTC) and under process
Task completed (00:32, 7 May 2022 UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. PangolinMexico (talk) 11:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Request to correct desription "ulice v Hrusice" (2022-05-20)

Request date: 20 May 2022, by: ŠJů

Task description

Please find items with cs description "ulice v Hrusice" and replace it with "ulice v Hrusicích". A simple grammar error (see here for the correct declination, locative case is "mluvnický pád 6."). 78 item pages affected. @Frettiebot: --ŠJů (talk) 22:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

Discussion: Done --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Request process: Accepted by (Matěj Suchánek (talk)) and under process; Task completed (14:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC))

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 14:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

Request to correct description "ulice v Pňovi-Předhradí" (2022-05-27)

Request date: 27 May 2022, by: ŠJů

Task description

Please find items with cs description "ulice v Pňovi-Předhradí" and replace it with "ulice v Pňově-Předhradí". 24 item pages affected.

Discussion

A simple grammar error. Locative case ("mluvnický pád 6.") past "v" or "ve" preposition for all Czech toponymes ending by "-ov" is "-ově", no alternative is possible. See here. --ŠJů (talk) 00:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC) @Frettiebot, Frettie, Matěj Suchánek:

Jestli to nevadí, udělám to ručně, za úpravu 24 výskytů pomalu ani nezapnu IDE ... --Frettie (talk) 06:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Done. ;) --Ben Skála (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Request to correct description "ulice v Mšené-lázních" (2022-05-30)

Request date: 30 May 2022, by: ŠJů

Task description

Please find items with cs description "ulice v Mšené-lázních" and replace it with "ulice v Mšeném-lázních". 30 item pages affected.

Discussion

A simple grammar error. The locative case ("mluvnický pád 6.") of adjective neutrum of the paradigm "mladé" is "mladém". See here. --ŠJů (talk) 08:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC) @Frettiebot, Frettie, Matěj Suchánek:

Done --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Request process: Accepted by (Matěj Suchánek (talk)) and under process; Task completed (12:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC))

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

reference URL (P854) → Holocaust.cz person ID (P9109) (2021-02-05)

Request date: 5 February 2021, by: Daniel Baránek

Task description

After intoducing Holocaust.cz person ID (P9109), reference URL (P854) in references can be replaced by this new identificator. The result of edits should be like this. It is 285,282 references. You can see all references, their reference URL (P854) value and value for Holocaust.cz person ID (P9109) here:

SELECT ?ref ?url ?id WHERE {
  ?ref prov:wasDerivedFrom [ pr:P248 wd:Q104074149 ; pr:P854 ?url ].
  BIND (REPLACE(STR(?url),"^.*/([0-9]+)[-/].*$","$1") as ?id)
  }

Try it!

Discussion

I believe I can use the following SPARQL to get a list of items to update:

SELECT DISTINCT ?item ?id WHERE {
  ?item ?prop ?claim.
  ?claim prov:wasDerivedFrom [ pr:P248 wd:Q104074149 ; pr:P854 ?url ].
  BIND (REPLACE(STR(?url),"^.*/([0-9]+)[-/].*$","$1") as ?id)
  }

Try it!

William Avery (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Request process

Accepted by (William Avery (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2022 (UTC)) and under process
BRFA filed at WD:BRFA § William Avery Bot 5 William Avery (talk) 17:10, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

After running the update there are a couple of hundred references to individual documents.

SELECT DISTINCT ?item ?url WHERE {
  ?item ?prop ?claim.
  ?claim prov:wasDerivedFrom [ pr:P248 wd:Q104074149 ; pr:P854 ?url ].
 FILTER IF (CONTAINS(STR(?url),"/obet/"), FALSE, TRUE)
  }

Try it!

A couple of dozen cases where there are two IDs on an item.

SELECT DISTINCT ?item ?url WHERE {
  ?item ?prop ?claim.
  ?claim prov:wasDerivedFrom [ pr:P248 wd:Q104074149 ; pr:P854 ?url ]
  FILTER CONTAINS(STR(?url),"/obet/") 
  }

Try it!

William Avery (talk) 15:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Individual documents are OK at the moment. Maybe a new property could be created for it. I will think about it. Daniel Baránek (talk) 20:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Task completed (15:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC))

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Request to remove references to Baltisches Biographisches Lexikon (2022-05-12)

Request date: 13 May 2022, by: MSGJ

Link to discussions justifying the request

Task description

Please remove all references to P2580 (P2580) in accordance with Wikidata:Properties for deletion/P2580.

This query returns all statements containing such references: [1] I would like these references to be removed. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Licence of data to import (if relevant)

Discussion

@MSGJ: Just to double check an example: on Peter Otto Goetze (Q54506847) the whole first reference should be removed from both date of birth (P569) and date of death (P570)?

@William Avery: No! I am only asking for P2580 (P2580) to be removed. Sorry if that was unclear — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:12, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

No problem. I have long experience in misinterpreting simple requirements. William Avery (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Request process

Accepted by (William Avery (talk) 19:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)) and under process
BRFA filed at WD:BRFA § William Avery Bot 4. William Avery (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Task completed (07:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC))

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Accademia delle Scienze di Torino multiple references (01-05-2022)

Request date: 1 May 2022, by: Epìdosis

Link to discussions justifying the request

Property talk:P8153#Multiple problems in recent import

Task description

Given the following query:

SELECT DISTINCT ?item
WHERE {
  ?item wdt:P8153 ?ast .
  ?item p:P570 ?statement.
  ?reference1 pr:P248 wd:Q107212659.
  ?reference2 pr:P248 wd:Q107212659.
  ?statement prov:wasDerivedFrom ?reference1.
  ?statement prov:wasDerivedFrom ?reference2.
  FILTER (?reference1 != ?reference2)
}

Try it!

In many items there are multiple references to date of death (P570) referring to www.accademiadellescienze.it (Q107212659)=Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153). Cases:

three references: maintain the first (stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)+subject named as (P1810)), delete the second (stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)), delete the third (stated in (P248)+retrieved (P813)) transferring the retrieved (P813) to the first
1. three references bis: if the first is stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)+subject named as (P1810)+retrieved (P813), the second and the third get simply deleted
2. three references ter: if there is a reference with reference URL (P854) containing a string "accademiadellescienze", it should be deleted; maintain the second (stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)), delete the third (stated in (P248)+retrieved (P813)) transferring the retrieved (P813) to the first
two references: maintain the second (stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)), delete the third (stated in (P248)+retrieved (P813)) transferring the retrieved (P813) to the first

Repeat the above query substituting date of birth (P569) to date of death (P570). Cases:

two references: maintain the first (stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)+subject named as (P1810)), delete the second (stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)+retrieved (P813)) transferring the retrieved (P813) to the first
1. two references bis: if the first is stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)+subject named as (P1810)+retrieved (P813), the second gets simply deleted
2. two references ter: if there is a reference with reference URL (P854) containing a string "accademiadellescienze", it should be deleted; maintain the second (stated in (P248)+Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153)+retrieved (P813))

Discussion

@Ladsgroup: as his bot is probably ready for doing this; the first request was archived despite not being solved, as well as the second. --Epìdosis 21:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

@Epìdosis I'm so sorry but complicated duplicate clean ups require dedicated time for coding which I really don't have among this and a million other volunteer responsibilities :( Amir (talk) 03:24, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

@Epìdosis: I took a look at this. Are the following updates acceptable?

I have not got as far as cases where reference URL (P854) and Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153) are present. William Avery (talk) 18:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

@William Avery: Absolutely perfect; and it is plausible that the cases where reference URL (P854) and Accademia delle Scienze di Torino ID (P8153) are present are very few to none. Thanks very much! --Epìdosis 08:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Great, I will take it forward. I clearly have more time on my hands than some people, and only English summer weather. :-( William Avery (talk) 09:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Request process

Accepted by (William Avery (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)) and under process
BRFA filed at WD:BRFA § William Avery Bot 7 William Avery (talk) 12:10, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Task completed: with a few manual deletions and adjustments (16:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC))

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. William Avery (talk) 16:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata link bot request (2022-02-19)

Request date: 19 February 2022, by: ToprakM

There is a category in trwiki that is named "Taxonbars that need a Wikidata item": tr:Kategori:Vikiveri nesnesine ihtiyaç duyan taksonçubukları. I think all articles listed already created some Wikipedias, such as svwiki. Can anyone link them with a bot?

Discussion

Many pages in that category have corresponding automatic taxonomy templates, which should also be linked to wikidata items. See tr:Kategori:Taksonomi şablonları. William Avery (talk) 12:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@ToprakM: I did some research on your category. Of 5276 articles, I am able to detect about 4215 matches to existing Wikidata items. I have to skip about 130 of these - non-unique taxon names in Wikidata. Of the rest, 71 already seem to have an article in trwiki (for example, Accipiter and Atmaca - what do you want to do with these?). The rest is 4017 items where I am able to add a sitelink to trwiki. Do you want me to proceed with those?Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you @Vojtěch Dostál, 71 seems low. I can handle them manually. I'd do prefer you to proceed except for these 71. --ToprakM ^✉ 18:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

@ToprakM Good, I started the job. The 71 articles which seem like duplicites are below:

New article	Existing article-identical taxon name
Accipiter	Atmaca
Trachurus	%C4%B0stavrit
Lampyridae	Ate%C5%9F_b%C3%B6ce%C4%9Fi
Buteo	%C5%9Eahin
Menura	Lir_ku%C5%9Fu
Chamaeleonidae	Bukalemun
Physalis_peruviana	Alt%C4%B1n_%C3%A7ilek
Pterois	Aslan_bal%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1
Pythonidae	Piton
Vigna_unguiculata	B%C3%B6r%C3%BClce
Testudinidae	Kara_kaplumba%C4%9Fas%C4%B1
Balaenopteridae	Oluklu_balinagiller
Pernis	Ar%C4%B1_%C5%9Fahini
Aix	Aix_(hayvan)
Arthrobacter_nicotinovorans	Paenarthrobacter_nicotinovorans
Arthrobacter_viscosus	Rhizobium_viscosum
Engraulidae	Hamsigiller
Bolitaenidae	Bolitaeninae
Solanum_betaceum	Tamarillo
Pectinidae	Tarak
Arthrobacter_nasiphocae	Falsarthrobacter_nasiphocae
Arthrobacter_sanguinis	Haematomicrobium_sanguinis
Thraupidae	Tanager
Chortinaspis	Choucoris
Birgus_latro	Hindistan_cevizi_yengeci
Melanotaeniidae	G%C3%B6kku%C5%9Fa%C4%9F%C4%B1_bal%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1
Merlucciidae	Berlam_bal%C4%B1klar%C4%B1
Lindsaeaceae	Lindus
Batis_(bitki)	Batis
Vigna_radiata	Ma%C5%9F_fasulyesi
Vigna_angularis	Azuki_fasulyesi
Gryllotalpidae	Gryllotalpa
Cicadidae	A%C4%9Fustos_b%C3%B6ce%C4%9Fi
Chrysopidae	Ye%C5%9Fil_zarkanat
Nephropidae	Istakoz
Argasidae	K%C4%B1%C5%9F_kenesigiller
Spermophilus_suslicus	Benekli_gelengi
Arthrobacter_histidinolovorans	Paenarthrobacter_histidinolovorans
Arthrobacter_cumminsii	Pseudoglutamicibacter_cumminsii
Arthrobacter_cryotolerans	Paeniglutamicibacter_cryotolerans
Arthrobacter_chlorophenolicus	Pseudarthrobacter_chlorophenolicus
Arthrobacter_nitroguajacolicus	Paenarthrobacter_nitroguajacolicus
Arthrobacter_aurescens	Paenarthrobacter_aurescens
Phyllostomidae	Yaprak_burunlu_yarasa
Galbulidae	Jakamar
Rajidae	Vatoz_bal%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1giller
Regalecidae	K%C3%BCrek_bal%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1
Synodontidae	Kertenkele_bal%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1
Tetraodontidae	Kirpi_bal%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1
Anarhichadidae	Kurt_Y%C4%B1lan_Bal%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1
Belonidae	Sargan
Myxinidae	Myxini
Crambe_(hayvan)	Crambe
Desmanthus_(hayvan)	Desmanthus
Chondrilla_(hayvan)	Chondrilla
Mertensia_(hayvan)	Mertensia
Calamus_(hayvan)	Calamus
Liparis_(hayvan)	Liparis
Synanceia	Ta%C5%9F_bal%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1
Clupea	Ringa
Sphaerophysa_(hayvan)	Sphaerophysa
Pica_(hayvan)	Saksa%C4%9Fan
Melampitta	Melampittidae
Oenanthe_(hayvan)	Oenanthe
Echinops_(hayvan)	Echinops
Otus	C%C3%BCce_bayku%C5%9F
Psittacella	Kaplan_papa%C4%9Fan
Neodiplotrema_(hayvan)	Neodiplotrema
Kermia_(hayvan)	Kermia
Ditropis_(hayvan)	Ditropis
Simsia_(hayvan)	Simsia

Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Also tagging @Vikiolog: who seems to have created some of the articles and may be interested in cleaning up those :)Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:08, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Vojtěch Dostál, I'm on it too, they are on my list. Some marked for merge, some needs change on taxons. As ToprakM said, manually manageable. Thanks for linking items :) Vikiolog (talk) 19:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

@Vikiolog Yeah, some may be rare instances where 2 taxons have the same name. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Request process

Accepted by (Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 19:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC))

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 21:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Request to run a script to remove a template call on items talk pages .. (2022-05-19)

Request date: 19 May 2022, by: TomT0m

Link to discussions justifying the request

It’s not to be run just yet, but as part of the deployment of {{Item documentation}} to Talkpageheader, see this discussion

Task description

it’s of course required to remove the ~4000 template call to {{Item documentation}} on item talk pages as they would be redundant. Delete them altogether should be fine.

Licence of data to import (if relevant)

Discussion

it’s somewhat trivial to implement, just amount to a call of something like mw:Manual:Pywikibot/template.py on the Main Talk namespace. Would do it myself if my bot still had a botflag but it’s easier to ask to someone who just has to call the command line.

Comment Is all we have to do is remove {{Item documentation}} from the top of all item talk pages, like this? --Kanashimi (talk) 21:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

@Kanashimi Yep, as far as the bot task is concerned. It could be done as soon as the talkpageheader is edited to include it. author TomT0m / talk page 08:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

... which has now been done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Request process

Doing… --Cewbot (talk) 00:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Kanashimi:   Done Please check the results and let me know if there is something wrong, thank you. - log --Cewbot (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
There are still >200 transclusions [2] — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:49, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
@MSGJ@TomT0m It seems there are many {{Item documentation}} not in the lead section. Do we need to remove all {{Item documentation}} in the talk pages? Kanashimi (talk) 23:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
@Kanashimi I guess yes, at least the one with no parameters. Some calls might for some reason call the documentation on another item ?

There might be some glitches in the aftermath such as if someone created a section to put the doc it will be an empty section but I think we can live with this. author  TomT0m / talk page 06:52, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
@TomT0m@MSGJ   Done Kanashimi (talk) 08:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Follow-up question: is there a reason not to delete now empty talk pages? There are currently roughly 7k of these after (most of) the template transclusions have been removed. —MisterSynergy (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
My robot doesn't have permission to delete pages, but yes, this job can be solved with a robot. Kanashimi (talk) 00:54, 28 May 2022 (UTC)