Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2019/11/15
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
drilling gun (Q3501301): break-action hunting firearm with three barrels: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Covers the same thing as Q221740, but only links to Finnish and Polish wikipedias --Non-Lurker (talk) 20:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by User:Wolverène, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Q75005217: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Nonsense Praxidicae (talk) 14:26, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Q74960541: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q75031793: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Test item 94rain (talk) 07:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Solenostoma paroicum (Q60617107): species of plant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Allready exists; see Q15348443 --Llywelyn2000 (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Llywelyn2000: For me it isn't clear that Solenostoma paroicum (Q60617107) and Jungermannia paroica (Q15348443) are identical. Can you elaborate? --Pasleim (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- As I understand, Solenostoma paroicum/shining flapwort is synonymic to Jungermannia paroica. --Wolverène (talk) 08:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Llywelyn2000: For me it isn't clear that Solenostoma paroicum (Q60617107) and Jungermannia paroica (Q15348443) are identical. Can you elaborate? --Pasleim (talk) 09:12, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Added the statement "Said to be the same as": [1], [2]. What do you think? --Wolverène (talk) 08:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.: can you provide some expertise, please …? Thanks, MisterSynergy (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- These are two different names, that is, two different formal entities. If there was more information a "taxon synonym" / "is a synonym of ..." statement could be added, but this information is not present. We really do need a "this name is homotypic with" property. - Brya (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- I am not an expert in Bryophytes, but the two taxa do have the same basionym: Nardia paroica Schiffn. Lotos 58: 320. 1910. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk) 22:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC), 22:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC).
- These are two different names, that is, two different formal entities. If there was more information a "taxon synonym" / "is a synonym of ..." statement could be added, but this information is not present. We really do need a "this name is homotypic with" property. - Brya (talk) 18:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, that is what I said: they are homotypic. - Brya (talk) 12:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. Also – for what it's worth – ITIS lists Solenostoma paroicum (Schiffn.) Schust. as a synonym of Jungermannia fossombronioides Aust. (Q17290457), but doesn't list Jungermannia paroica at all. Then again I guess ITIS is fairly often not very well updated these days. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 12:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC).
- Yes. And Tropicos says that Jungermannia fossombronioides is treated as a synonym of Solenostoma fossombronioides by Stotler, R. E. & B. J. Crandall-Stotler. 2017. A synopsis of the liverwort flora of North America north of Mexico. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 102(4): 574–709. A synopsis of the liverwort flora of North America north of Mexico. Information on bryophytes is fairly scarce. - Brya (talk) 17:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes. Also – for what it's worth – ITIS lists Solenostoma paroicum (Schiffn.) Schust. as a synonym of Jungermannia fossombronioides Aust. (Q17290457), but doesn't list Jungermannia paroica at all. Then again I guess ITIS is fairly often not very well updated these days. –Tommy Kronkvist (talk), 12:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC).
Not deleted -- Lymantria (talk) 07:52, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Cleopatra (disambiguation)
Q60374066: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
It should be merged into Q20799297 but automatic merge fails. Maybe the same with: Q60371864(French) Q60372192(Greek) Q60372373(Cyrillic) Q60372801(Persian) Q60372959(Hebrew) Q60373103(Belarusian) Q60373294(Armenian) Q60373492(Japanese) Q60373639(Georgian) Q60373849(Chinese) --Puzzlet Chung (talk) 03:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- They can't be merged now because they're interlinked with Property:P460. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 07:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- In January @Moebeus: add Property:P460 to all the item and didn't merge them. maybe he can help us to understand why not merge them. - yona b (talk) 07:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- @יונה בנדלאק: Hi there! It is the practise of Wikidata:WikiProject_Names that each spelling variant gets its own item, even if all that separates them is just an accent. Since each name should be linked to a corresponding disambiguation page, it's cleaner if those follow the same "rule". Rather than merging, the different spellings are instead linked through Property:P460. This has the added bonus of allowing more than one disambiguation page per language, of which there are quite a few. Anyways, that was the rationale, if you guys feel strongly about it I won't protest, but it would be helpful if a differing practise is anchored in some sort of written guidelines and cleared with Wikidata:WikiProject_Names. Moebeus (talk)
- In January @Moebeus: add Property:P460 to all the item and didn't merge them. maybe he can help us to understand why not merge them. - yona b (talk) 07:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
Not deleted --Lymantria (talk) 07:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
question (Q3800557): linguistic expression used to make a request for information, or the request made using such an expression: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Blank entry --Pequod76 (talk) 01:12, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- This should be merged with the item you moved the it.wikipedia link. Quakewoody (talk)
- Done Redirect created by User:Lymantria, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Q75038413: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Test item. Shinnin (talk) 09:10, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by ChristianKl (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 11:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
torque converter (Q1990325): fluid coupling that transfers rotating power from a prime mover to a rotating driven load: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Blank entry --Yuriz (talk) 10:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Yuriz: Please don't delete data of existing items. If two items are the same, merge them. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 10:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:ChristianKl, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Mercury Passing Before the Sun (Q3855080): painting by Giacomo Balla, National Museum of Modern Art, Paris: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Merge to Q26831186 Kirk39 (talk) 12:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kirk39: One is about a series of paintings, the other about an individual painting. You might want to have a look at Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings --- Jura 11:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Jura1: It's a composition of the same day, later I will edit the article in it.wikipedia.--Kirk39 (talk) 11:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Not done it's the way Wikidata handles series of paintings. --- Jura 11:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Adamo Telecom (Q73411376): telecommunications and internet service provider in Spain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Already and entry Q30903988 --91.126.133.59 11:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- I merged them. But I would like to see someone with knowledge of the industry go and clean up the entry. Quakewoody (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Quakewoody, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:50, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
Q74065265: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Delete this item --Tentrekodak (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Pls never act like this, particularly do not remove interwikis as it may provoke the creation of duplicates. What's for the situation, make us sure that Sundanese- and Malay-language articles will be deleted first and then wait and see. --Wolverène (talk) 06:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)