Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2017/09/21

Promotional content; there are items about all his family members which I implicitly nominate for deletion as well MisterSynergy (talk) 05:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleted by Sjoerddebruin (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:10, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q22696288

pentene (Q22696288): group of chemical compounds: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Sitelinks have been merged to Q151353. Can't merge automatically because one was set up as a disambig item but the other was set up as a broad-concept article item, so Special:MergeItems throws out a conflict error. If somebody would clear all descriptions from Q22696288 and redirect it to Q151353 that will be great. --Deryck Chan (talk) 17:12, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

because Q22696288 is a disambig and Q151353 is item. why you think it need to be merge? (i delete the change you did on both items). - yona b (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Not deleted Valid item. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q19235205

Q19235205: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redirect Hsarrazin (talk) 14:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q19235212

Q19235212: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redirect Hsarrazin (talk) 14:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q40534866

Q40534866: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No sitelinks --HaeB (talk) 09:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleted by YMS (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Template:Country-related property

Handled by Module:Property documentation. Probably need a bot to remove transclusions.--GZWDer (talk) 21:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please give the item ID. --105.112.36.250 21:05, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

The page nominated for deletion is a template, not an item. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:59, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

GZWDer This template in on a lot of talking page. Do it realy for delete? it is not in use anymore? - yona b (talk) 07:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

So probably we need a bot to remove transclusions.--GZWDer (talk) 10:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

@GZWDer: can you ~~do this, or~~ ask at Wikidata:Bot requests for such a job? One would probably have to check whether the property already has the corresponding country item as value of a country (P17) claim before removal of the template from the property talk page. Once this is done, we can proceed here and decide whether it should be kept of deleted. —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy: I have removed all transclusion. These pages can also be deleted:

--GZWDer (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, looks good. @Matěj Suchánek: this functionality is now fully covered by {{Property documentation}} and Module:Property documentation in a way that it takes P17 values from the property and adds it to the doc box, right? If that is the case, I don’t see any reason to keep the template and the nominated categories any longer. The deletion comment for the template should contain instructions about the new way to relate properties to countries. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I did my best to implement it properly and also localize. I am not sure whether we want to keep it and mark as {{Outdated}} or so, still there are some translations that could be migrated. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 09:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Something like Template:Deprecated template (Q6480967) would fit better, but we don’t have a copy of it at Wikidata yet. To my opinion this would be a good idea for the nominated template to guide users what to do instead. We should still delete the maintenance categories, since they don’t serve any purpose any longer. —MisterSynergy (talk) 09:29, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

I now added a simple {{Mbox}} to the template page. If someone finds a suitable category for deprecated templates, it would be worth to add it to the deprecated template.

@SJK: you’ve created most or all of the categories nominated for deletion above. Is there any template other than {{Country-related property}} which fills them? —MisterSynergy (talk) 19:04, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

@MisterSynergy:. I don't think so. I just created them because they were red links, but I don't really know (I didn't come up with the idea, just saw a bunch of red links and made them blue.) If the template which generates them is being deleted, I don't see a problem with deleting them. SJK (talk) 16:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Okay thanks. I meanwhile figured out that those categories come from Module:ConstraintCheck, which seems to be no longer in use as well. If this assumption is correct and @Jura1 as the only author of this undocumented module doesn’t object, I would delete it as well in the next days. —MisterSynergy (talk) 21:55, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Not deleted Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q29848066

Q29848066: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Replace with Q4167836 and category combines topics (P971)
--- Jura 08:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Support. However, there are 3758 claims of the type instance of (P31) Q29848066 to be repaired before this could be done. Who’s volunteering? —MisterSynergy (talk) 08:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

I would do, but I think we should decide about deletion first.
--- Jura 09:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Support more standard --ValterVB (talk) 09:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Comment I started replacing the ones that already have P971 and adding Q4167836 to the others. Once more P971 added there, Q29848066 could be removed from these as well.
--- Jura 20:00, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Support several claims are more appropriate than one rare sentence in this case. Shouldn't use P31/P279 just for every claim. d1g (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Comment item is no longer in use and can be deleted. I think adding P31:Wikimedia category (Q4167836) might also have helped these items get P971 statements from various bots that are adding them these days.
--- Jura 09:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q3786545

Val Bondasca (Q3786545): river in Switzerland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty Eingangskontrolle (talk) 12:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by Lymantria, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q9235810

Q9235810: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item BohemianRhapsody (talk) 13:27, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleted by Lymantria (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q25994189

Template:Request for permission (Q25994189): Wikimedia template: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q13100981; contained just a single item now merged there —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Maybe it can be merged, but last time I tried that I messed things up so in case that's required, I'll let you do that. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by MisterSynergy, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Q38186789

Q38186789: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Most (if not all) sitelinks are up for deletion due to self-promotion issues. The lack of non-"imported from" sources and non-self-promoting authority control identifiers is also suspect. Mahir256 (talk) 01:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

On hold - As long as the articles aren't deleted, the item meets the notability criteria. Mbch331 (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

@Mbch331: Should cross-wiki spam on otherwise completely inactive wikis (hiwikiquote) deserve the continued existence of a Wikidata item? Mahir256 (talk) 06:47, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

@Mahir256: According to our current rules it does. But if it's an inactive wiki, it's probably a Global Sysop Wiki and you can ask a global sysop to delete the article. Mbch331 (talk) 07:15, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

I recommend to file a deletion request at meta:Steward requests/Miscellaneous. This page is linked from hi:q:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion, and hiwikiquote does indeed not have local admins [1] or an active local community [2]. Maybe also the meta:Small Wiki Monitoring Team with global sysops could help. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

@Mbch331, MisterSynergy: I have filed the appropriate steward request for hiwikiquote. Mahir256 (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Deleted by Stryn (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)