Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/05/16
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Ana Madalena Trigo de Sousa (Q67604751): Portuguese historian and researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
I want this entry that contains my name - Ana Madalena Trigo de Sousa - and it was written without my knowledge and consent to be deleted and removed.
On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Keep valid identifiers. --RAN (talk) 04:28, 12 May 2021 (UTC)- Keep passes Wikidata:Notability. --Palaangelino (talk) 21:08, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
Delete my bad. I was fast-scrolling. Request says it all. --Palaangelino (talk) 22:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)- Keep, the principal author of at least three scientific articles - Q67604678, Q67605032, Q67722654. The item doesn't even disclosures any private info. --Wolverène (talk) 10:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Comment yes, @Wolverène and @RAN you're all true. But person herself doesn't want her data publicly shown here. That's something clearly mentioned on our policies: without consent we can't store public data of people. We should ping an admin here. --Palaangelino (talk) 12:26, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- 1) If we delete the item, the related items will still mention her name (using the property 'author name string' instead of 'author'), unless we delete three those items for articles which is unlikely. 2) Wikidata just uses (normally) the information from other databases or publically available sources, so even after deletion we can't guarantee that item for the person won't be re-created by e.g. a bot. 3) There are no public data except the full name and country of citizenship, roughly speaking it used to be her choice to publish the articles openly and using the full real name. She also seems not to be a person with a special past, e.g. a person who ever convicted in crime or unwantedly an internet meme personality, I mean it's unclear which risks may appear if her name is stored here. The reason that's shown here is just like 'I just want it'. --Wolverène (talk) 13:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Palaangelino: "without consent we can't store public data of people" - Could you please cite the policy you're quoting here? Thanks, Bovlb (talk) 18:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Wolverène: yes, I totally agree and understand my friend. That's why I voted keep at first as well. And @Bovlb: I don't really remember where I saw that kinda statement but we can ask some people if it's true or not. This will also light me up. --Palaangelino (talk) 18:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
Not deleted This item is borderline, but does pass notability criterion #3 because of the three publications. It does not appear to contain any information that would might be considered personal or private such as weight or FaceBook. It is based on publicly-available information about an academic. We do not normally seek the knowledge or consent of a subject in order to create an item here. We are sensitive to privacy concerns, but there don't seem to be any here, and we have no verification that the OP is the individual identified (or even another person with the same name). Bovlb (talk) 02:53, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Ellie Zeiler (Q97460859): American dancer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Doesn't meet the notability criteria. No sitelinks, internal links or external IDs (besides social media accounts). I've removed one reference (since the website isn't in any way reliable) and two "imported from" statements that were added although there was never a sitelink and no page with this name as the title ever existed on the English Wikipedia. Kam Solusar (talk) 01:23, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- The Cosmopolitan writes about her ([1]). That should make her relevant via the second point of the relevance criteria. --Gymnicus (talk) 09:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep definitely should be improved with more identifiers though. --Palaangelino (talk) 21:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted Meets notability criterion #2. Bovlb (talk) 02:55, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
list of festivals in Nigeria (Q5445837): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This is not an item but a list of items ie. the different festivals in nigeria. consider writing an article on wikipedia or better still, create the individual festivals as item here on wikidata Udehb (talk) 13:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- At the moment, the data object is incorrectly structured in my view. I will change it. Due to the Wikipedia link, however, it is relevant anyway and cannot be deleted. --Gymnicus (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted Valid item per WD:N #1. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 08:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q58331113: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
صفحة تجربة --Dr. Mohammed (talk) 10:17, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by باسم (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 12:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
invalid ID (L490837): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not a lexeme Jon Harald Søby (talk) 11:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106849020: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Acidental duplication (Split handled in Q106849022) Lokal_Profil 07:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Downton Abbey (Q52084945): Wikimedia category: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Copie de Q8389130 avec presque aucune propriété (peu d'intérêt pour une fusion). --Eunostos (talk) 08:32, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Bovlb, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106857690: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Accidentally created MdsShakil (talk) 10:14, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106857689: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Accidentally created MdsShakil (talk) 10:15, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Olaf Carlson-Wee (Q106860067): American entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Accidentally created duplicate item The9Man (talk) 15:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Bovlb, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:50, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Sabrina Schloss (Q47012636): American actress and singer (born 2004): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Schloss depicted person is non-notable. I nominated all photos about her in Commons for deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails notability Doctor of Patriot Relations 🇺🇸 (talk) 09:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Wikimedia Commons link + took a part in the filming of Lady Bird (a credited role). So meets criteria #1 and #3. Irrelevance for a Wikipedia project doesn't necessary mean that a person isn't notable for Wikidata. --Wolverène (talk) 09:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- I think it is important to consider that the commons links he is referencing are nominated for deletion and likely will be deleted. Doctor of Patriot Relations 🇺🇸 (talk) 02:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep That the English language Wikipedia says that it is not relevant is of no concern to us here in Wikidata. We have other relevance criteria and this is what the lady fulfills, as already Wolverène said. It doesn't matter whether the images on Commons are deleted or not. But I assume they won't be deleted. --Gymnicus (talk) 13:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted as strutural need for her role. --Fralambert (talk) 17:42, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106765666: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Vandalism, not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 12:33, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:40, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106806420: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No clarity on Wikidata:notability — billinghurst sDrewth 13:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q102046591: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted page وسام (talk) 20:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106767435: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty. de-article was deleted. --Dandelo (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106764384: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam Trade (talk) 23:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Spam. I found nothing via Mix'n'match. As the article some are just retweet by the item. --Fralambert (talk) 17:36, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q61128766: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
EEmpty item; it had only one sitelink. It was to the srwiki. I moved the page in the Draft namespace. Kizule (talk) 00:41, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Martin Urbanec (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
2021 JSB1000 Suzuka 2&4 Free Practice 2 B Gr. (Q106819400): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Confusion during QuickStatement edit, better/faster to start anew Serpicozaure (talk) 03:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Serpicozaure Not done this item is already used from a lot of places. Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:53, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Serpicozaure
Q29467462: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This object was in the database because it was marked on a surveying map from 1765 according to these notes from 1986. The 1986 document says the mound had been ploughed over and only reached a height of 0.5 meters back then.
I visited the site yesterday and can add that the mound is completely non-existent today, both from the ground and from above. This is only one example of many in this area (others include Q29467354, Q29467452 and Q29467500). --Autom (talk) 11:03, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted The mound is in the database, so this is notable via criterion #2. Also the fact that the mound disapeared don't mean that it's not notable. Fralambert (talk) 18:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Chapel of Virgin Mary (Q38234425): Czech chapel in Nové Hrady: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not existing, probably duplicate JAn Dudík (talk) 06:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Have desapeared from the datebases. --Fralambert (talk) 02:31, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Probably a duplicate of Chapel of Virgin Mary (Q38234420) - the Wikipedia list page (Q8554978) linked to http://iispp.npu.cz/mis_public/searchDocument.htm?search=metainfo:44646/3-323 which has a photograph of the same building, and the coordinates are almost the same. Peter James (talk) 22:14, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- @JAn Dudík Should we merge them? --Fralambert (talk) 17:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:JAn Dudík, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Q106854490: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? --Zoyahssn (talk) 18:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- I also deleted Q106854388 from the same user. Fralambert (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)